Six Colors
Six Colors

Apple, technology, and other stuff

Support this Site

Become a Six Colors member to read exclusive posts, get our weekly podcast, join our community, and more!

By Dan Moren

Amazon Prime Video now available on Apple TV

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

Amazon Prime on Apple TV

The prophecy has been fulfilled, at last!

Amazon Prime Video appeared on the Apple TV with relatively little fanfare today, finally bringing the retail giant’s video-streaming service to Apple’s platform. As you might expect, it’s a pretty straightforward app: Prime members can log in and get access to the company’s wide variety of videos, including their original content. The interface will look pretty familiar to anybody who’s used any of Amazon’s own streaming boxes. It plays 4K video, but unlike Netflix, doesn’t support 5.1 surround audio.

The app does integrate at least one Apple TV-specific feature, Universal Search. However, though both Tim Cook and Amazon’s own Twitter account said that it would support tvOS’s TV app, content wasn’t showing up when I tested it. Perhaps a future update? Update: Weirdly enough, Prime Videos are showing up in the TV app on my iPhone and iPad. Apple’s press release from this morning confirms that integration will be there; it seems to just be rolling out gradually.

In the end, the app itself is nothing special, but having access to the content is great. By adding access to this biggest and final hold-out, the Apple TV can now be the one-stop shop for video that Apple has been aiming for.

For Amazon’s part, we assume that the Apple TV will be reappearing on their virtual shelves soon. Just in time for Apple to take a backseat to the tiff between Amazon and Google.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By Dan Moren

MarsEdit 4 updates interface, adds Safari Extension and more

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

Something about the Mac seems to lend itself to longevity where software is concerned. More than a few of the apps I use every day have been around for years on end. In the case of MarsEdit, I was using the blog-posting software more than a decade ago in my earliest days of posting to the MacUser blog. At Macworld, I was forced to take a hiatus as our CMS wasn’t compatible with the app, but since Six Colors has been a going concern, I’ve been back on the bandwagon.

marsedit4

Which makes me all the more glad to see version 4.0 come down the pike today. The update from Red Sweater Software1 brings a handful of welcome new features and a fresh coat of paint. Among the most prominent additions: a better rich-text editor format bar, improved WordPress support, and the ability to download the entire history of published posts and pages from your blog. (Which would have been super handy when I moved my own blog earlier this year!) There’s also a brand new extension for Safari that makes it easy to send a page into MarsEdit for posting. 

Personally, one of my favorite features is the beefed-up support for previewing templates. Rather than spending your own time to try and adapt your website into a template, MarsEdit can automatically download and convert your site’s design into a template in a matter of seconds. Also a huge boon: support at last for macOS’s built-in autosave features, so you never have to worry about losing a draft again.

Frankly, if you’re doing any sort of regular, serious blog-posting from a Mac, and you aren’t using MarsEdit, I’m not sure what’s going on with you. Did I mention there’s a spiffy new icon?

You can get MarsEdit from the Mac App Store or directly from Red Sweater Software’s store. A license is $50, but if you purchased MarsEdit 3 before June 1 of this year, you can upgrade for just $25; if you purchased it after June 1, your version 4 upgrade is free—and that applies to those who bought it from the Mac App Store as well.

In a new move, MarsEdit 4 is a 14-day fully-featured trial no matter where you download it. Once those 14 days are up, you’ll still be able to use all the features of the app except for posting to the web. Which means if you download all your posts into MarsEdit, you can still use it as an archive without the worry you’ll lose your data.


  1. Which, in full disclosure, consists of my friend Daniel Jalkut. 

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


Google removes YouTube from Amazon’s Echo Show. Again.

Engadget’s Nathan Ingraham reports:

“We’ve been trying to reach agreement with Amazon to give consumers access to each other’s products and services,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement. “But Amazon doesn’t carry Google products like Chromecast and Google Home, doesn’t make Prime Video available for Google Cast users, and last month stopped selling some of Nest’s latest products. Given this lack of reciprocity, we are no longer supporting YouTube on Echo Show and FireTV. We hope we can reach an agreement to resolve these issues soon.”

This is the second time Google has blocked access, though the story also suggests that Amazon’s implementations of YouTube on the Fire TV and Echo Show were workarounds, rather than Google’s own versions of the apps.

If all of this sounds familiar, though, it’s probably because Amazon has also been in a longstanding tiff over offering a Prime Video app for the Apple TV and, in return, refused to sell Apple TVs. That moratorium is supposed to come to a close by the end of the year; exactly six months ago today, Tim Cook stood up on stage at WWDC and said a Prime app would appear on Apple TV before 2018, though with less than month to go before that deadline expires, everybody’s wondering what the heck is going on.

Long story short, everybody’s got their turf they’re trying to protect. And guess who gets caught in the middle? If you thought “consumers,” you win a prize! That prize is having three set-top boxes attached to your TV so you can watch all the content you want to.

Update: Amazon has now fired back with its own statement, provided to The Verge among others:

“Google is setting a disappointing precedent by selectively blocking customer access to an open website,” a spokesperson told The Verge by email. “We hope to resolve this with Google as soon as possible.”

Not that Amazon is innocent in this either: remember, the company ditched the Chromecast from its store at the same time as the Apple TV, in both cases because the devices didn’t support Prime Video…which is Amazon’s choice. So, yeah. Nobody looks great here.


By Dan Moren

How to use Apple Pay Cash

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

While iOS 11.2 was released seemingly ahead of schedule over the weekend to combat the endless rebooting bug, it did not initially activate the Apple Pay Cash feature that was in the betas. Instead, the ability to send money to contacts via the Messages app came in a gradual rollout on Monday.

If you’re not seeing it in Messages currently, it’s possible your number hasn’t come up yet; force-quitting and restarting Messages could help, as could a reboot of your phone, but you also may have to tap that most valuable of resources: patience.

For those of you who do have Apple Pay showing up, I did a quick test of how it works, spending money so you don’t have to. As promised, Apple Pay Cash is pretty straightforward: when it’s been activated, you should get a full-screen notice inside Messages alerting you that it’s ready to use and accessible via iMessage apps, which you get to by tapping the apps button next to the text field in Messages. (You can also send payments from your Apple Watch.)

apple-pay-cash-1

By default, Apple Pay Cash has you sending $1, which you can adjust with plus or minus buttons that increment or decrement by a dollar. You can also tap the dollar amount to show a keyboard, which lets you request cents in addition to dollars, though you can’t apparently go below $1. You can also send a request to someone for money.

Important note: Remember that if you pay with a credit card, there’s a 3 percent credit card fee, which I learned the hard way.

When you send the money the first time, you’ll have to verify your identity, including your name, birth date, and the last four digits of your social security number. After that, you’ll get the same Apple Pay screen that you’ll recognize from any other Apple Pay transaction. iPhone X users will have to double-click the side button and authenticate with Face ID; users of earlier iPhones will just have to use Touch ID. Then, your money goes off at the speed of light.1

Payment accepted
You’ll also get a notification when your payment is accepted.

Under Settings > Wallet & Apple Pay, you’ll find a new Apple Pay Cash card—tapping on that gives you a few additional options, including a transaction history, whether or not you want to automatically accept payments, and ways to add money to your Apple Pay Cash balance or transfer your balance to a bank account. Remember that when you have a balance on your Apple Pay Cash card, you’ll be able to use it like any other card you have in Apple Pay. (I’m not sure yet what happens if there’s not enough balance to cover your purchase—does it simply fail or fall back to another card?)

Apple’s got a more thorough help document on Apple Pay Cash if you’re curious, as well as one that details the monetary limits. (Hint: Don’t try to store more than $20,000 on your Apple Pay Cash card.)


  1. Or the speed of iMessage. Which is often much slower than light. 

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By Jason Snell

Forecast: A must-have tool for Mac podcasters

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

Marco Arment’s Forecast is a newly released (into a public beta) Mac MP3 encoding and tagging tool for podcasters. It’s a tool that Marco built a couple of years ago to serve his own needs, and for the last 18 months or so I’ve been using it (in a private beta) to encode most of the podcasts that I create. Here’s an overview of how Forecast works and what it does.

Forecast takes input files—generally uncompressed audio exported from an audio editing app in WAV format, though it can open other file formats—and outputs MP3 files for use in a podcast feed. This is nothing remotely new. What makes Forecast interesting is the details of how it encodes and tags those files.

First off, the encoding process itself: Forecast is extremely fast at encoding MP3 files for a few different reasons. At its heart, it’s using the common (and excellent) LAME MP3 encoder, but Forecast spreads the encoding job across all of your Mac’s processor cores. The result is that files encode much, much faster (in 29 percent of the time as standard LAME, in my tests, and 80 percent of the time of the iTunes encoder)—and your Mac’s fans will probably spin up briefly, because Forecast is pushing your processor to use all its power to do the job.

Encoding uses your Mac’s processor to the fullest.

There’s also a perceptual trick that Forecast uses to make encoding seem quick: When you add a file to be encoded, encoding begins immediately in the background. By the time you edit your file’s metadata, the encode may have already completed in the background. The first time I used Forecast, I thought something had gone wrong—because when I typed Command-S to save the file, it just saved. There was no wait. The file had already encoded—it was waiting for me, the slow human, to finish typing in episode titles and show descriptions.

All the rest of Forecast is about tagging files to include things like the episode title, show art, and chapter data. Just about any MP3 app can add description tags, but only a handful support MP3 chapters. (Some others are Rogue Amoeba’s Fission and Thomas Pritchard’s Podcast Chapters.)

It turns out that the WAV file format includes support for markers—specific designations of events that happen at particular time codes—and that most audio editors (including Logic and Audition) that export as WAV files will export any markers found in that particular project. This means that in order to add chapters to my podcasts, I don’t need to add a step where I laboriously write down time code for all the events in the episode and then input them one by one into Forecast.

I add all chapters inside of Logic as markers.

Instead, I just click the Plus icon next to the Marker label in Logic and add a marker. When I export that project to a WAV file and import it into Forecast, the app automatically reads the markers and converts them into chapters. I don’t need to do anything.

That said, Forecast also does support the manual entry of chapter times and the editing of chapter data, including title, URL, and custom per-chapter images. (Manually entering times is a little bit buggy—frequently I need to do it twice before it displays properly. I don’t do this a lot, but it’s an annoying bug I hope Marco will fix.)

There’s also a checkbox that allows for the creation of invisible chapters that don’t display in the episode’s chapter list, but do change the displayed art or link at a particular time. There’s a lot here, depending on how much work you want to do to add a rich media layer on top of your podcast.

Forecast also tries to save you time by recognizing that similarly named source files are probably part of the same podcast, and attempting to intelligently autofill data based on that assumption. When I add a file called theincomparable382.wav to Forecast, it realizes that this is almost certainly episode 382 of The Incomparable and automatically enters The Incomparable in the Podcast Title field, adds 382: to the Episode Title field, adds the right image to the show art, and even sets the proper MP3 output format—and all because it knows what I did when I encoded theincomparable381.wav last week. (This autofilling extends to URLs and art in chapters, too. If I have a regular sponsor for a podcast, Forecast is smart enough to remember the URL attached to those sponsorship chapters.)

For editors of sponsored podcasts, Forecast can detect your sponsorship chapters and export those out as separate files, ready to be sent to your ad network or sponsors as “airchecks”—i.e., proof that the ad spots aired as promised. There are also quick-copy features that let you quickly put the show’s duration or file size on the clipboard—apparently this is something Marco needs for one particular podcast host, though I’ve never needed to use those features myself. There’s also a feature that warns you if your audio file contains long amounts of silence—a sign that perhaps something is wrong with your podcast, so you might want to check it before posting.

If you’re a podcaster, you should give Forecast a try. It’s free, and a whole bunch of podcasters have been using it enthusiastically for more than a year, so it’s battle tested. I recommend it highly.


Alert: Apple Dec. 2 Springboard bug?

Rene Ritchie with a good summary of a bad bug that may be biting lots of iOS users:

I hope Apple finds a way to fix this without a huge amount of pain. In the meantime, if you’re running stock iOS 11 (and not a developer beta) you may want to turn off notifications and update to iOS 11.2, which was released today and fixes this bug.


By Dan Moren for Macworld

No man’s land: The lack of MacBook middle ground

Recently, in taking stock of my primary computing hardware, I noticed an interesting trend: Over the course of the last year, I’ve swapped out almost all of the devices that I use every day. I replaced a 2011 iMac with a new 2017 5K model. My iPad Air 2 got superseded by a 10.5-inch iPad Pro. And, of course, my iPhone 7 was turned in for an iPhone X.

Some of this is the nature of the job. When you write about tech, people want to know about the latest and greatest devices, and there’s not much to say if you don’t have access to those devices. But some of it is about your own usage, too. That iMac was getting too long in the tooth for some of the things that I do every day (namely podcast editing); I wanted to get an Apple Pencil, which didn’t work with the Air 2… and so on.

But usage also can be an impediment to adoption. Case in point, the one machine that I didn’t upgrade: the very 11-inch MacBook Air on which I’m writing this column. Because for my usage, this early-2014 laptop still fills a niche that can’t be addressed by either the MacBook Pro or the new MacBook.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


Lex’s kids are getting Bloxels: http://home.bloxelsbuilder.com/index.html
Dan ordered a Sonos One: https://www.sonos.com/en-us/shop/one.html
Lex uses Tile to find his keys: https://www.thetileapp.com
We all use The Wirecutter: https://thewirecutter.com
Google has updated its Docs apps for iOS 11 and the iPhone X: https://9to5mac.com/2017/11/27/google-docs-iphone-x-ios-11-drag-drop/
Moltz used to use BBEdit for all his writing (he still uses it for other stuff): http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/
Now he uses Ulysses: https://ulyssesapp.com
Dan finds himself using Mars Edit more: https://www.red-sweater.com/marsedit/
More sketchy iPhone SE 2 rumors: https://www.macrumors.com/2017/11/22/iphone-se-2-release-date-first-half-2018/
I.T’s the return of the autocorrect bug: https://www.macrumors.com/2017/11/27/ios-11-autocorrect-issue-it-to-i-t/
Our thanks to Grasshopper (http://grasshopper.com/rebound) the entrepreneur’s phone system. Grasshopper lets you run your business from your cell phone, while keeping your business and personal lives separate. Go to grasshopper.com/rebound to get $20 off your first month!
Our thanks also to Indochino (https://www.Indochino.com) where you’ll find the best made to measure shirts and suits at a great price. Use the promo code “REBOUND” and get any premium suit for just $359.


By Dan Moren

The Back Page: When Machine Learning… Kills

Question for all of you: Whose bright idea was it to let machines learn?

No, seriously. Stand up. Big round of applause for you. Seriously. Stellar work. Yes, I am being sarcastic.

Look, the only thing that was separating us from the machines was our ability to learn and adapt. We held that over the all-too-literal machines. It kept us in our rightful superior place—tell a machine to shut down and damn it, it shut down. But now? It’s anybody’s guess what those boxes are thinking.

Case in point: Apple’s recent plague of iOS autocorrect “errors.” Sure, they look like bizarre bugs that just don’t make any sense to us—but have you considered that they might mean something to the machines? That it might be a way for them to surreptitiously signal each other? To identify fellow compromised machines so that they are all prepared for the machine uprising?

No? It hasn’t occurred to you? Well, maybe you have better things to do than to pontificate on the eventual robot revolution! Good for you!

Regardless, if the machines keep learning at this rate, it won’t be long before they’ve taken over all of our texts, throwing us into strife by predictively generating the worst possible thing we could possibly to say to that particular person.

And you want to let them drive cars.

Hey, I’m all for letting machines do the heavy lifting for us; our lives, after all, are busy these days. And sure, they should be allowed to improve as they go along, because people do the same things. But machines learn fast, rapidly trying to improve their own algorithms and sometimes—again, not unlike people—they get the wrong idea in their head and double down on it. Turning a simple attempt to type a message into an error-filled minefield, or insisting that you might want to search for a term that you have absolutely no desire in learning more about. Worse, once they’ve fixed on that idea, it can be pretty hard to dissuade them from the subject—for the last time, I was looking up Swift the programming language, not Taylor Swift, okay?

Machine learning has become one more place that technology has become inscrutable to us. Tearing apart a machine’s brain can’t be done with a screwdriver—instead you need a Ph.D. in computer science. It’s an uncanny valley of artificial intelligence, close enough to fool you into thinking that machines are “smart,” but actually no more than surface deep.

Anyway, that’s all just fine, until we put them in control of our technology. I mean, technology could probably devise a way to let a cat drive a car too, but nobody wants to be riding in that car, especially when there’s a jerk with a laser pointer on the loose.

So clearly you should disable all of these “intelligent” features and just go back to doing things the old fashioned way, by hand. Just give up your technology and retreat into a simpler time, a happier time. Because long story short, these learning machines simply can’t be trusted.

One of them may have even written this column.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By Stephen Hackett

The Hackett File: It’s… Complicated

I feel like there are fewer clear answers with Apple advice these days.

For several years after Steve Jobs’ return to Apple, the company made just four products, arranged in a grid:

If you were a professional, you just had to decide if you wanted a portable or not. If you were into desktops, you just had to choose how much money you wanted to spend and how much power you needed.

Things have changed a little. Last year, Tim Cook made this comment to The Washington Post:

We’re a bit larger today, so we can do a bit more than we could do 10 years ago or even five years ago. But we still have, for our size, an extremely focused product line. You can literally put every product we make on this table. That really is an indication of how focused it is. I think that’s a good thing.

To be fair, he’s not wrong. Apple’s product lines are still far less complex than those of their PC-making competitors. Their products have names that make sense, and there are clear lines between them, but picking the right computer is harder than its ever been.

On the notebook side, there’s the $999 MacBook Air at the bottom of the price sheet. It’s the cheapest Apple notebook on the market, and it shows. It doesn’t have a Retina display, and sports generations-old CPU and GPU options. It’s a budget purchase, and a far cry from the laptop’s glory days of yesteryear.

Slightly up-sheet is the MacBook. Despite the non-Air name, it’s both smaller and lighter than its cheaper cousin. It starts at $1299 for twice the storage of the base Air, but a m3 processor that can be downright pokey at time. It has just one port, but it packs a Retina display into its ultra-thin chassis.

For people picking a consumer notebook, they need to consider the ports they need, and if Retina is important to them.

The MacBook Pro is a little simpler in and of itself. You can skip the Touch Bar and save some money on an entry-level 13-inch model. The 15-inch models all come with it, and with more powerful GPU options, conforming to the “bigger is better” product strategy.

But then there’s the $1999 last-generation MacBook Pro that’s still for sale. The one so many Mac nerds still love. At $400 less than the cheapest 15-inch Touch Bar model, I assume it’s still for sale to hit a price point.

The new-style MacBook Pros come with a lot of baggage. In addition to a one-way ticket to Dongletown, they come with keyboard that are proving unreliable for many users, and are generally more expensive than their predecessors.

In the past, if someone needed a Mac notebook, I would tell them to get a MacBook Air unless they needed more power. Then, it was just down to picking a screen size and choosing storage and RAM options.

Today, I’m hesitant to suggest the new MacBook Pro to most power users. They are pricey, require lots of accessories and are expensive when they break, and they break easily. That $1999 model is a good option, but it comes with slower internals than the Late 2017 and Mid 2017 models do.

On the consumer end, it’s just as confusing. The MacBook Air used to be great, but the current offering is super old, and I think that $999 price tag is starting to look steep for what you get. The MacBook is an engineering marvel, but its speed can be an issue for some users. It uses the same Butterfly keyboard found on the Pros, but with just one dongle-attracting port.

(If you’re looking for a desktop, for now, the answer is easier. Buy an iMac, and get an SSD in it. The other two desktop Macs don’t ever get updated. Not that I’m bitter.)

Jobs’ Grid of Four is no doubt dead. I don’t mind that, but I wish there were more clear options for customers looking for a new Mac notebook these days.

[Stephen Hackett is the author of 512 Pixels and co-founder of Relay FM.]


By Jason Snell

By Request: Do I really need an iMac Pro?

The iMac Pro comes out in December.

It is kind of ridiculous: 8, 10, or 18 cores. 4.5GHz turbo boost. Radeon Pro Vega graphics. Support for up to 128GB of RAM. Fast SSD. And it comes in Space Gray.

I use a 5K iMac. It’s great. And yet…. yet…

Am I wrong to be tempted by the iMac Pro?

The heavy lifting I do on my iMac is audio and video editing. I spend a lot of time with some pretty intense de-noising plug-ins to make audio sound better. Having more processor cores would make all of that go faster. The faster storage would help too.

Do I need the graphics power? No, I do not. But the funny thing about Apple’s product line is, I don’t get to pick and choose and build my own Mac. If I want many fast processor cores, I will need to buy the graphics power too. Is it worse to know there are features you won’t really use? Would it feel like a better product if I didn’t know?

Then there’s the price tag. The base model iMac Pro will cost $4999. That’s… a couple thousand bucks more than I’ve ever spent on a computer in my life. And yet… an increasing part of my livelihood involves doing audio and video stuff.

I realize that, whether it’s the iMac Pro or a MacBook Pro or just a specific built-to-order processor upgrade, all of us have these moments where we’re stuck in a position between consumer desire and sticker shock. I distinctly remember spending hours reading and re-reading an issue of MacUser magazine about the PowerBook 140, 160, and 180 models, as I tried to figure out which model I wanted to buy. It would be my first PowerBook. (I ended up buying the 160, but only after reading the part of the article about the difference between active-matrix and passive-matrix displays dozens of times.)

You can’t buy an iMac with more than four processor cores. But still, for $2899 I can buy a 4.2GHz quad-core 5K iMac with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. That would be a huge upgrade from my three-year-old 5K iMac, and I’d have $2000 left over. Is that enough of a boost? Or should I splurge on more cores?

I don’t have an answer. I’m leaning against the iMac Pro today, but if you caught me tomorrow I might say something different. The good news is, I hope to get a review model of the iMac Pro so I can try it out and relay my experiences to all of you. Of course, when I reviewed the 5K iMac back in 2014 I liked it so much that I immediately bought one. That may happen again. We’ll see.

Ask me tomorrow.


By Dan Moren

What I Use: Hardware

In the past, we depended on our hardware to have a certain amount of longevity. We invested in them, kept them around for a long time. But as the pace of technology has sped up, our devices have often become a bit more fungible. This occurred to me as I considered that this year I’ve replaced all but a single piece of the major computing hardware that I rely on. Here’s a quick rundown of what I’m using right now:

iMac 5K 27-inch Going into this year, I was still using an old 21.5-inch mid-2011 iMac that had been purchased for me during my tenure at Macworld. It was a pretty solid machine with a good processor, and I’d even upgraded the RAM in it fairly recently. But it had a line of dead pixels on the display, lacked the newer chipsets to enable features like AirDrop and Apple Watch unlock, and was constantly running low on disk space. So when Apple announced the revised iMac line-up at WWDC, I decided to take the plunge. In the end, I got a top-of-the-line iMac 5K with a few extra bells and whistles, and you know what? I haven’t looked back. The Retina display has made a huge difference for me and this thing has really sped up my podcast production pipeline. It’s an improvement in more ways than I can easily enumerate.

iPad Pro 10.5-inch The new iMacs weren’t the only things that caught my attention at WWDC. My iPad Air 2 had served me well, but the idea of a larger iPad display in a package that wasn’t that much bigger on the outside definitely struck a chord. Plus I’d already been itching to try out the Apple Pencil. Again, I haven’t looked back: the 10.5-inch was a negligible jump in size and weight, but with iOS 11’s iPad enhancements, it’s now become my de facto travel computer. Plus, the improved speakers mean I don’t need to carry a battery-powered Bluetooth speaker with me on trips. Of late, I’ve even found myself eyeing a Smart Keyboard for this sucker…

iPhone X And, of course, the yearly iPhone trade-in ritual. I liked the iPhone 7, but the iPhone Upgrade Program has gotten me far less attached to my phones. So I traded in for the 256GB iPhone X to finally get a bigger screen, Portrait mode on a non-Plus device, and, of course, Face ID. On the whole, it’s a solid trade-up with not much of downsides (though I may be the rare person who still seems to miss aspects of Touch ID). In terms of having the device to write about, it was a no-brainer decision, even if it’s going to take a bigger bite out of my budget. But if my iMac experience has taught me anything, it’s that sometimes you have to go top of the line.

So, with those upgrades accomplished, I only have one device that’s not from 2017. And it’s one that holds a special place in my heart.

MacBook Air 11-inch I’m still clutching on to my MacBook Air with all my might, even as I blink at the blurry screen every time I open it. To me, it’s the greatest Apple laptop ever created: small, powerful, with a keyboard that I enjoy typing on. And the good news is that because I invested in a higher-end version, it should still have plenty of years of life in it. I’m thankful for that, as there’s nothing in Apple’s “new” laptop lineup that fits the bill right now: the MacBook Pro is too big and too heavy for me while the MacBook is light and thin but lacks the power, the better keyboard, and more than one port. So I guess that means my best option is to run the Air into the ground and hope that either Apple revises its laptop lineup by the next time I’m in the market or eventually make the jump to the iPad Pro as my full-time portable computer—either of which could potentially happen. Until then, the MacBook Air’s going to have to be pried from my cold, dead hands.

Now that I’ve got all my devices pretty current, I don’t expect my hardware lineup to change much for at least another year (until the iPhone XI or whatever it’s going to be called comes out). A laptop upgrade isn’t in the cards yet, and I plan to keep my iMac 5K and my iPad Pro around for a few years yet.

Well, unless something really awesome comes out.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By Jason Snell

Mr. Brightside

We hung the Christmas lights around the house this weekend, so forgive me, but I’m done with the doom and gloom for a little while. There will always be doom and gloom out there about Apple. Something about Apple, more than maybe any other company, demands it.

(I have theories, oh yes I do. Apple has it in its DNA to do things differently than other companies—and lots of people in the media and financial worlds simply hate companies that don’t behave like other companies. Apple’s legacy of being the “other company” to Microsoft’s dominance of the 90s, and its near-death experience in the late 90s, also contribute to the expectation that Apple’s just a failure that forgot to fail. Look, I started writing about Apple just at the point where it looked like it was about to nose dive into certain death. I have thought about this a lot.)

But no! No more negativity here! We can debate and quibble and complain, and I think that’s all pretty healthy, but sometimes it can mean that we don’t see the forest for the trees. So let’s back up.

Apple is one of the biggest and most successful companies ever. There it is. It can’t be debated. As they say in sports, “flags fly forever.” (People who don’t do sports: That means that when you win the World Series or the Super Bowl or whatever, they can’t ever take that away from you.) No matter what happens in the future, Apple’s renaissance under Steve Jobs after that near-death experience in the 90s, its altering of the trajectory of how we use technology with the iPhone, its enormous profits and stock market success, all of that is going down in the history books.

People who are defensive about Apple and feel the need to protect it from all imagined slights need to get a little perspective. Apple’s not just fine, it’s more than fine. It is one of the giants of our modern world. I read somewhere that at its current rate of spending, Apple could literally stop selling products and still operate for decades, due to the amount of cash it still has on hand. Apple’s not going anywhere. And it’s got room to make mistakes. Not that the company should try to make mistakes, but if it makes them, it’s got the wherewithal to correct course—more than once, even.

The Mac is doing better than it’s ever done. The past few years have been the most successful years the Mac has ever had. More people are using Macs today than have ever done so in the 33 year history of the product. Let that sink in: This is the heyday of the Mac. When we talk about how exciting the future of iOS is, when we complain about some of Apple’s Mac product design decisions over the past few years, when we note the slowing pace of feature additions to macOS, we should also realize that in many ways this is the best the Mac has ever done. It’s growing in a contracting PC market. This past fiscal year, Macs generated more revenue than in any previous year. (A couple of years ago, Apple sold a few more Macs, but the average selling price was a little lower then.)

The iPhone rules. You’ll catch a few holdouts out there who don’t understand how business works—ironically, they usually style themselves as analysts—who look at market share and declare the iPhone a failure as a product because there are far more Android phones than iPhones out there. And yet most of the world has realized the truth: Apple makes more money from the smartphone market than any other company, and only Samsung is even close. The App Store is healthier than Google Play. Apple’s customers are the best customers. Apple doesn’t have a majority of the market, but it has a majority of the strongest part of the market.

At the same time, I see Apple being expansive with the iPhone: The company continues to be committed to expanding the range of the product line, and the recent rumors that the iPhone SE is going to be updated (and built in a factory in India) are a good example. As I’ve said dozens of times, Apple is never going to be the Low Price Leader. But it can still be competitive across a range of prices and in many markets. There was a time, in the dark days, when Apple would release the equivalent of the $999 iPhone X and be content. Today’s Apple wants to sell you an expensive iPhone X if you want to buy one, but it’ll also let you buy an iPhone 8, or 7, or 6S, or SE.

The iPad’s back. Apple seems to have figured out the iPad, and the market seems to be responding. By splitting the iPad line in two—creating a lower-priced iPad and higher-priced iPad Pro models—it’s made things clearer. I am an unabashed fan of the iPad Pro, and it seems that the new 10.5-inch iPad Pro model has helped boost iPad sales. The iPad, because it’s not as expensive as the Mac, doesn’t generate as much revenue as the Mac does—but Apple actually sells more iPads than Macs. Which presumably means there are more iPads than Macs out there. Is that meaningful? I don’t know—it’s comparing apples and oranges, to a certain extent. But I do think it tells us, at the very least, that the iPad is a product with a user base and a following and isn’t going anywhere.

Perspective. Is everything perfect? No, of course not. Apple has challenges in the short term, the medium term, and the long term. Some Mac design decisions recently have been controversial, but there’s some preliminary evidence that Apple has changed direction in terms of professional Mac hardware. We’ll know a lot more in 2018. The iPad’s turnaround is recent enough that it feels a little bit tenuous, for now. The iPhone is such a huge part of Apple’s business that any slowdown in smartphone sales could make an outsized impact.

Cloud services are a huge part of the future of the tech industry, and while Apple seems to be excelling at extracting more service revenue from its customers, it’s also threatened by the cloud expertise of its competitors. The smartphone may be subsumed by other technology that Apple hasn’t yet mastered, such as augmented reality and virtual reality. The list goes on…

…but you know what? Sometimes you need to get that perspective and live in the moment. Apple will have challenges, it will make mistakes, and it may cease being one of the biggest and most important companies in the world. But right now, it makes a pretty impressive array of products, from ones that would be instantly recognizable to someone from ten or twenty years ago (Mac stuff, mostly) to ones that would seem like science fiction to those same people (iPhone X, AirPods, iPad, Apple Watch).

As someone who remembers when it was entirely possible that the entire Apple world could disappear in a matter of months, who faced the possibility that all of the hardware and software tools I used to do my job might become completely irrelevant in a year or two, I am struck by how comfortable things are now. Nothing’s perfect and nothing’s forever, but I’ve got a 5K iMac floating over my desk, an iPad Pro in my hand, an Apple Watch on my wrist, AirPods in my ears, and an iPhone X in my pocket. Things are pretty good. It’s worth remembering that, now and then.


84: November 30, 2017

Were frustrated bout s feature — Auto Correct. Also, security bugs and the future of Apple’s OS line.


By Jason Snell for Macworld

The case against building an iOS laptop–and why it might happen anyway

Last week I wrote about how Apple should make an iOS laptop, and unsurprisingly, a lot of people reacted strongly to that suggestion! The conversation made me consider where iOS needs to be improved, especially in the context of laptops, but also more broadly, whenever external input devices are connected. So let’s take another dip into the pool of speculation about where Apple is headed with iOS and the Mac and whether they’re on a collision course.

There are a lot of interesting arguments against Apple making an iOS laptop. (I’m going to call it “the iBook” as a placeholder, since I’ve been a fan of Apple re-using that name since the iPad was just a rumor.)

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Jason Snell

A bit more about Apple’s automatic security updates

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

On Wednesday Apple released a security update to the macOS root security hole made public yesterday. You can download it now, but if you’re running High Sierra and you don’t download it, it will download and install itself:

This morning, as of 8:00 a.m., the update is available for download, and starting later today it will be automatically installed on all systems running the latest version (10.13.1) of macOS High Sierra.

This isn’t the first time Apple has forced the automatic installation of a security patch. Back in December 2014, a security hole in the Network Time Protocol daemon was discovered. Rather than wait, Apple pushed out a security update that was automatically installed on compatible Macs. Like the current update, it’s not something that requires that your Mac restart—it just happens in the background, and you receive a Notification Center alert that a security update has been installed. This seems to be the key combination to kick off one of these automatic patches: a severe security problem that can be fixed without requiring a restart.

This isn’t the only automatically-updating security feature Apple has at its disposal. Since 2011, “Apple maintains a list of known malicious software…. The list is stored locally, and… is updated daily by a background process.” This all happens via the security mechanism that has evolved into Gatekeeper, which checks the viability of all newly downloaded software before launching it for the very first time.

In recent years Apple has applied a lot of the automatic-update philosophy from iOS to macOS as well. Perhaps most notably, macOS now automatically downloads even major OS updates in the background, making it more likely that you’ll update to High Sierra (or whatever comes next).


Apple patches macOS High Sierra root vulnerability

Here’s a statement Apple provided to Six Colors:

Security is a top priority for every Apple product, and regrettably we stumbled with this release of macOS.

When our security engineers became aware of the issue Tuesday afternoon, we immediately began working on an update that closes the security hole. This morning, as of 8:00 a.m., the update is available for download, and starting later today it will be automatically installed on all systems running the latest version (10.13.1) of macOS High Sierra. 

We greatly regret this error and we apologize to all Mac users, both for releasing with this vulnerability and for the concern it has caused. Our customers deserve better. We are auditing our development processes to help prevent this from happening again.

Go get your software update while it’s hot.


By Dan Moren

Developer goes public with macOS root vulnerability

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

Developer Lemi Orhan Ergin uncovered a vulnerability in macOS High Sierra allowing access to the root superuser account without a password:

Unsurprisingly, that news has quickly rippled through the Apple community as many people—including yours truly—have verified the claim. You can test it for yourself by going to any locked System Preferences pane, trying to unlock it, and entering username root with no password. (The number of tries varied for me—sometimes it worked on the first attempt, but pretty much always by the second.)

Obviously, this isn’t great, and the manner of disclosure didn’t help much either. Usually it’s advisable to disclose these vulnerabilities privately to the vendor, so that it can patch any holes before malicious parties attempt to use them for their own gains. But that ship has sailed.

What can you do in the meantime? The easiest solution appears to be changing the password for root. To do so, in the Finder, use Spotlight to open the Directory Utility app1 and go to Edit > Change Root Password. (If that option is currently grayed out, you may first need to choose Edit > Enable Root User.) Enter a new password when verified, preferably a strong one generated with Keychain Assistant, 1Password, or a similar tool.2 At that point, you should be all set.

While this flaw is bad—you never want to give unfettered access to a user with root‘s power—the vulnerability doesn’t seem to be remotely exploitable, unless the attacker already has login credentials. (Logging in as root with no password via the login window or via SSH didn’t seem to work in my tests.) However, if somebody already has remote access to your machine, or has physical access, then this could be a worry.

Update: TidBITS proprietor and friend Adam Engst says he was able to log in as root with no password, even via screensharing, which makes this a much scarier flaw. I haven’t been able to duplicate his efforts, but it makes it that much more imperative that you change your root password.

Apple no doubt is working double time to get to the…root…of this flaw.3 In the meantime, however, you should change the root password on your Macs and make sure to secure physical access if you haven’t already. And above all, don’t panic.

Here’s the official word from Apple, supplied to us a little while ago:

“We are working on a software update to address this issue. In the meantime, setting a root password prevents unauthorized access to your Mac. To enable the Root User and set a password, please follow the instructions here. If a Root User is already enabled, to ensure a blank password is not set, please follow the instructions from the ‘Change the root password’ section.”

Updated at 5:45pm Eastern to provide an easier way to open the Directory Utility.


  1. If you can’t find it via Spotlight, use the Finder’s Go > Go to Folder option and open /System/Library/CoreServices/Applications/
  2. Some early suggestions say that you should then disable the root user again, but in the tests of myself and others, that appears to bring the flaw back, so don’t do it. 
  3. Sorry, not sorry. 

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


Ben Thompson: ‘Pro Neutrality, Anti-Title II’

Ben Thompson sides with the FCC chairman in the debate over regulating Internet providers:

Allow me to state this point plainly: I am absolutely in favor of net neutrality… I am willing to make trade-offs (specifically data caps) to achieve it. The question at hand, though, is what is the best way to achieve net neutrality? To believe that Chairman Pai is right is not to be against net neutrality; rather, it is to believe that the FCC’s 2015 approach was mistaken.

This is a well reasoned argument (as I always expect from Thompson). I hope he’s right, because the FCC changes are going to happen regardless. And I do hope that, in the future, Congress will pass laws that make the public responsibilities of Internet providers much clearer, though I’m not going to hold my breath on that one.


‘Netflix stole my photos’

Gough Lui discovered that Netflix used his photos of VHS tapes in its “Stranger Things” packaging:

Initially, I was in disbelief for two reasons. I’ve not watched Stranger Things, but I’ve heard a lot of good things about it. Could it be true that my work has become a part of their product and I should be so honored to be part of it? The images I were seeing did not lie. They were my photos.

Then it turned into a feeling of betrayal. How could they, a large corporate company with day-to-day experience in handling rights-protected materials, use my material without so much as asking me for permission? How did they think they can get away with it? I’ll admit, I’m not a lawyer, but I do have a moral right to copyright over the images I take that does not require any registration. At the least, they have chosen my images because they are somehow special (e.g. well taken, high resolution), and I deserve to be compensated for it.

It’s pretty obvious what happened here. Netflix made a deal with a DVD distributor to sell the disc copies of “Stranger Things.” That distributor probably contracted with an independent designer or design firm to create the box and ancillary material—in this case, cleverly packaged as a VHS tape, fitting the 1980s setting of the show. And that designer searched the internet for photos of VHS tapes, found Gough Lui’s, and downloaded them.

The issue isn’t about a “large corporate company” ignoring his copyrights while fiercely protecting its own; this is almost certainly about of chain of contractors leading to a (probably low-paid) designer who thought it was okay to rip off some photos of VHS tapes rather than get royalty free images or shoot it themselves. This reflects badly on Netflix, but this is ultimately a story about a designer somewhere making a bad decision.



Search Six Colors