Six Colors
Six Colors

by Jason Snell & Dan Moren

This Week's Sponsor

End users aren't your enemy! Kolide gets users to fix their own device compliance problems–and unsecure devices can't log in. Click here to learn how.

By Jason Snell

By Request: Do I really need an iMac Pro?

The iMac Pro comes out in December.

It is kind of ridiculous: 8, 10, or 18 cores. 4.5GHz turbo boost. Radeon Pro Vega graphics. Support for up to 128GB of RAM. Fast SSD. And it comes in Space Gray.

I use a 5K iMac. It’s great. And yet…. yet…

Am I wrong to be tempted by the iMac Pro?

The heavy lifting I do on my iMac is audio and video editing. I spend a lot of time with some pretty intense de-noising plug-ins to make audio sound better. Having more processor cores would make all of that go faster. The faster storage would help too.

Do I need the graphics power? No, I do not. But the funny thing about Apple’s product line is, I don’t get to pick and choose and build my own Mac. If I want many fast processor cores, I will need to buy the graphics power too. Is it worse to know there are features you won’t really use? Would it feel like a better product if I didn’t know?

Then there’s the price tag. The base model iMac Pro will cost $4999. That’s… a couple thousand bucks more than I’ve ever spent on a computer in my life. And yet… an increasing part of my livelihood involves doing audio and video stuff.

I realize that, whether it’s the iMac Pro or a MacBook Pro or just a specific built-to-order processor upgrade, all of us have these moments where we’re stuck in a position between consumer desire and sticker shock. I distinctly remember spending hours reading and re-reading an issue of MacUser magazine about the PowerBook 140, 160, and 180 models, as I tried to figure out which model I wanted to buy. It would be my first PowerBook. (I ended up buying the 160, but only after reading the part of the article about the difference between active-matrix and passive-matrix displays dozens of times.)

You can’t buy an iMac with more than four processor cores. But still, for $2899 I can buy a 4.2GHz quad-core 5K iMac with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. That would be a huge upgrade from my three-year-old 5K iMac, and I’d have $2000 left over. Is that enough of a boost? Or should I splurge on more cores?

I don’t have an answer. I’m leaning against the iMac Pro today, but if you caught me tomorrow I might say something different. The good news is, I hope to get a review model of the iMac Pro so I can try it out and relay my experiences to all of you. Of course, when I reviewed the 5K iMac back in 2014 I liked it so much that I immediately bought one. That may happen again. We’ll see.

Ask me tomorrow.

Search Six Colors