Six Colors
Six Colors

Apple, technology, and other stuff

Support this Site

Become a Six Colors member to read exclusive posts, get our weekly podcast, join our community, and more!

By John Moltz

This Week in Apple: Big business bucks

John Moltz and his conspiracy board. Art by Shafer Brown.

This week Piper Sandler takes on the most harrowing task of all while Google makes it rain on Cupertino. And if you’re waiting to buy the latest Apple kit this year, your wait will soon be over.

The scariest time of year

Say, how are the kids these days? Has anyone checked on them? Are the kids… all right?

“iPhone Continues to Be Most Popular Smartphone Among Teens, Apple Watch Ownership Growing”

Well, I kind of meant more emotionally. But I guess that works, too. It’s certainly more pertinent to this column.

This is, of course, Piper Sandler’s annual survey of teens across America, and hats off to them for doing this every year because teens are frightening. You ever see a group of them at the mall?

[shudder]

And, as the report notes, they’ve been doing this a long time.

Since the project began in 2001, Piper Sandler has surveyed more than 248,283 teens and collected over 60.7 million data points on teen spending.

That’s a lot of teens. But it still might only be a certain subset. Ten years ago, Apple Insider noted that Piper was only surveying teens in upper and middle income brackets. It’s not clear if it’s continued that practice or not, so while these results might be indicative of the purchasing patterns of better-heeled teens they may not speak for all teens.

Do teens like iPhones and Apple Watches? Sure. Do 87 percent of all teens in the U.S. own an iPhone as the survey claims? That’s less certain.

Pay to play

It has previously been suggested that Google paid Apple somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 billion to be the default search engine on iOS. Well, apparently inflation has gotten a lot worse than we thought.

“Google Pays Apple $18B to $20B a Year to Be Default iOS Search Engine”

I was gonna say it’s good work if you can get it, but I’m not sure how much work is really involved. Certainly there are a lot of lawyers involved. I’m just not sure how much coding.

Bernstein says Google pays out 22 percent of total ad revenue under its traffic acquisition costs (TAC) and estimates Apple likely receives around 40 percent of this.

Hey, look, iOS developers! It could be worse!

Eddy Cue has defended continuing to make Google the default search engine by saying there’s no “valid alternative”. As a DuckDuckGo user, I’d take exception to that assertion. In Cue’s defense, though, he might just be saying there’s no valid alternative to getting $18-20 billion a year. I get that.

Very sane Apple rumors

We are about halfway through October and time is running out for any additional Apple hardware this year. Current rumors indicate those M3-based MacBooks we were hoping to get won’t ship until next year. Please adjust your scorecards accordingly.

Now at the tenth hour a new rumor suggests…

Wait, is it a rumor when it’s based on extended ship dates for Macs? Is reading portents rightly categorized in “rumors” or should it be considered “speculation” or “conjecture”?

Are there any etymologists in the audience?

I said “etymologists”, Karl. No one wants to hear about your fish degree right now.

At any rate, as MacOtakara noticed, ship dates for iMacs have been delayed, indicating that a refresh could be coming, possibly the long-awaited bump to an M2 processor. Usually the darling of Apple’s lineup, the iMac has now fallen behind the once-lowly Mac mini in the refresh cycle (the last mini refresh took 26 months while the current iMac has been out for a whopping 30 months).

There’s still a fair chance that Apple will rev the iPad Air this month, but all other rumors, portents, signs and bones cast indicate we’re done for the year for everything else.

Unless you have $21 billion. In which case Apple might also be willing to sell you a previously unavailable spot as a search engine.

[John Moltz is a Six Colors contributor. You can find him on Mastodon at Mastodon.social/@moltz and he sells items with references you might get on Cotton Bureau.]


Security, utilities, and cloud services

Apple’s Mac security is willing but its user experience is weak, Bartender as a Mac minimalist utility, and Glenn is on a rampage.



Glenn Fleishman on troubleshooting iCloud Drive

iCloud problems are all the rage now! Friend, colleague, and occasional Six Colors contributor Glenn Fleishman has an extensive article about trying to figure out problems with iCloud Drive syncing:

Thus was the beginning of my pain. While I had suffered from iCloud Drive synchronization problems in the past, I’d never had such a sustained and resistant issue as over the last five months. That’s right—five months. Worst of all? The problem is now solved, but I don’t know what caused it nor how to avoid it in the future. Apple’s engineering elves fixed it without sending information back through the super senior Apple technical support person I dealt with across many emails, calls, and hours of troubleshooting.

Yes, the old iCloud black box strikes again. Since posting my story, I’ve gotten a ton of emails and social media messages about people with iCloud problems, and while I’d expect any service with as many users as Apple’s offering to have a fair number of edge cases, it does at times feel like the whole thing is made out of edge.

Technology issues aside, Apple does need to do a much better job about communicating with its users, especially in regards to services. These are customers contributing to one of the company’s most important (and profitable) segments, and it’s a fundamentally different proposition than Apple’s usual transactional business of having somebody buy a product and walk away. If the company wants to retain these customers for the long run—not to mention bring in additional customers—then support needs to be job one.


By Jason Snell

Boox Palma review: A phone-shaped e-reader

Note: This story has not been updated since 2023.

Boox Palma (center) surrounded by more traditional Kindle and Kobo e-readers.

As a big fan of e-readers, I’ve been experimenting with Android-based alternatives to the dedicated Kindle and Kobo hardware for a few years now. The advantage of an Android E-Ink reader is that it can run any app—Kindle and Kobo, but also Libby and third-party ebook readers and newspaper apps and RSS readers. An Android-based E-Ink reader offers the promise of a single device for E-Ink reading from disparate sources.

E-readers from Boox have offered appealing hardware, but keep letting me down with inferior software. But now, at last, I’ve gotten perilously close to finding an alternative to dedicated E-Readers.

And it’s shaped like a phone?

One handed E-Ink

The $280 Boox Palma is slightly smaller than an iPhone 15 Pro Max, with a 6.13-inch E-Ink screen. It doesn’t have cellular connectivity, but otherwise it feels like a generic Android (version 11) phone, with four different side buttons, a USB-C charging port, and a camera on the back that Boox says is for “document scanning,” though it feels more like it was part of a reference phone design that had to come along for the ride.

I’ll admit that I didn’t expect to like a phone-shaped e-reader. I’ve really come to love the design style shared by the Kindle Oasis and Kobo Libra 2, both of which feature seven-inch displays with physical page turn buttons you can rest your fingers on. And to be fair, I was less comfortable while reading on the Palma, since I needed to grip the device more tightly with my whole hand and stretch my grip to reach the volume buttons (repurposed as page-turn buttons) on the device’s side. But on the other hand, this was a supremely portable reader, like a beat-up paperback you can take just about anywhere.

It’s on the software side that I feel like Boox has taken a big leap forward. Part of that is that Boox’s own software game appears to have elevated. In the past, using Boox products was like wading through mud. On early models, I had to use workarounds to even enable the Play Store, and the Boox add-ons to manage the unique needs of E-Ink devices felt clunky.

Boox lets you optimize Android apps for E-Ink reading.

All that’s pretty much gone. While I don’t love a lot of the Boox-written software that’s preinstalled on the device, I was able to log into the Play Store with ease and download other apps. And Boox’s system utilities worked wonderfully to let me map the device’s volume buttons to support page turns and its side button to force a refresh of the E-Ink screen when things would occasionally get dingy. Boox offers per-app overrides to modify Android apps to be more E-Ink friendly, and they almost always did the job. (Boox also seems to have made some strides in regulating battery life. Some of its early devices felt like they’d die after a few hours, on or off, but with Wi-Fi off the Palma can last for weeks while asleep and offer dozens of hours of illuminated reading.)

I do think that in the case of the Palma, the strengths of Android itself are also coming to the fore. Previous Boox devices I’ve used have tablet-sized screens, and many Android apps still don’t run well at those sizes. But they’re all optimized for phones! As a result, the third-party app experience felt a lot better on the Palma.

Disappointingly, the biggest app failures on Android are the apps for the big e-reader companies. I found reading in the Kobo apps, as well as the Libby app for library e-books, to pale in comparison to using a more generic e-reading app such as Moon+ Reader. The Kindle app for Android was fine, once I configured it properly.

One of the challenges of E-Ink screens is that they don’t refresh as fast as the LCD or OLED screens that most devices use. This means that scrolling on the Palma is manageable, but imprecise—and leaves the display looking a bit smeared. Ideally, Boox could override every app to support page turns on the press of a button and to reduce contrast so that text will pop on the E-Ink screen. Some apps were better at this than others.

Crossing a threshold

Palma on top of larger e-readers.

But after testing numerous Boox readers before ultimately putting them back in their boxes and concluding they just didn’t do it for me, I find myself feeling different about the Boox Palma. Maybe some of that is its solid support for Moon+, which is a very good ebook reader. I was able to plug the Palma into my Mac and sync it with Calibre, loading it up with books and short fiction, and then read all of it in Moon+. (I also sideloaded Georgia, my preferred e-reading font, which Moon+ was happy to display.)

No, not all of the Android apps I used were perfect fits for the E-Ink screen, but all of them were at least functional enough to use. I’m most disappointed in Kobo and Libby, since those ecosystems are my top sources of books. Perhaps unsurprisingly, decent Android apps supporting open standards like ePub and RSS adapted better to the Palma.

Though I didn’t write a review of it, I also have spent some time with Boox’s Tab Mini C, which is a 7.8-inch color E-Ink reader. Color E-Ink is extremely strange, but the refresh rate was good in color and spectacular in black and white. Unfortunately, the Tab Mini C is a lot heavier than a Kindle or Kobo reader, and lacks page-turn buttons. But its software is solid, just as it is on the Boox Palma.

In the end, I think Boox is nudging closer to making a good Android replacement for a Kindle or Kobo, one that would let me add RSS and newspapers to my dedicated reader. The Palma’s size may be perfect for some users, but I’d prefer a larger screen. The Tab Mini C is more like it, but it lacks those physical buttons. If Boox were to create a new version of its Leaf reader (which is the right size and has page-turn buttons) with the software that runs the Palma, it might be right in my sweet spot.

But that shouldn’t take anything away from the Boox Palma, which is a simply wild idea for a product… that pretty much delivers on its promise. E-reader fans who can be comfortable with Android and wish they could read on a compact device that doesn’t have a phone screen, it may be time to slip the Boox Palma into your palm.


Using Passkeys, how Apple could replace Google default search revenue, macOS Screen Sharing, and whether we take photos and capture video at concerts.


Video

Hands on with Bartender 5

Here’s a new video about Bartender 5, which is a great utility with some fun new features.


Dan’s iCloud problems continue, Lex makes a startling lifestyle change and Moltz wishes he didn’t get email.


By Jason Snell for Macworld

Apple is destroying the Mac by trying to make it safer

Due to an extremely weird series of troubleshooting maneuvers, I recently found myself having to set my Mac up from scratch without migrating any of my preferences for the first time in longer than I’d like to admit. Think decades, not years.

This meant that I had to experience every single Apple software default, enter license numbers into software not bought in the Mac App Store, and generally need to re-make every decision that I had taken over the last few years in order to get back where I wanted to be.

More than anything else, though, the experience reminded me that Apple has a lot of work to do when it comes to making the experience of upgrading or migrating to a new Mac more pleasant—and that its Security and Privacy team clearly has too much say in the overall macOS experience.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Dan Moren

ScreenSharingMenulet gives you quick access to Screen Sharing

Note: This story has not been updated since 2023.

Ever since I discovered screen sharing many many years ago, I’ve been an avid user of the technology. I’ve remotely accessed my machines while away from home, sometimes across the country or even from a different part of the world. And while the widespread availability of cloud services makes it somewhat less critical than it once was, I still rely on the feature.

For years, I’ve used Edovia’s excellent Screens on both macOS and iOS, but with Sonoma’s recent update to the built-in Screen Sharing app—including its new high-performance mode—I’ve decided to give Apple’s own solution a whirl.

However, one thing that I’ve gotten used to with Screens is the ability to quickly access my remote Macs via a handy little menu bar icon. Surely, I figured, there had to be an equivalent for macOS’s Screen Sharing feature.

ScreenSharingMenulet

After casting about for recommendations, a few people mentioned just what I was looking for: Stefan Klieme’s ScreenSharingMenulet. It’s a little no-frills menu bar app that just provides you with quick screen sharing access to other machines via macOS’s built-in Screen Sharing app. By default it detects Bonjour connections on your local network, but it also supports adding manual remote connections if you have other machines you want to log into.

(I will, of course, continue to use Screens on my iPhone and iPad, since Apple doesn’t by default offer screen sharing to or from iOS / iPadOS, an oversight I hope it corrects in the future. )

ScreenSharingMenulet is incredibly simple, which is fine by me because it just does what I want. I appreciate that you can even streamline the interface down to its bare essentials by hiding the About / Preferences menu. If I’ve got one nit to pick it’s that I don’t love the icon: it includes a little version of the cursor and every once in a while when I’m looking for the cursor1 I seize upon that one instead.

But other than that, for $1.99, ScreenSharingMenulet perfectly fulfills its purpose, and that’s a rare thing for software these days.


  1. I’ve recently encountered a bug that makes the cursor disappear, which makes this extra annoying. 

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


Worth a Thousand Lies

I really enjoyed this post by Nick Heer about the complex topic of whether photographs represent reality or not, whether Google is pushing things further than it should, or if this is all just the latest chapter in a story that started long before Photoshop:

The criticisms I have been seeing about the features of the Pixel 8… feel like we are only repeating the kinds of fears of nearly two hundred years. We have not been able to wholly trust photographs pretty much since they were invented. The only things which have changed in that time are the ease with which the manipulations can happen, and their availability. That has risen in tandem with a planet full of people carrying a camera everywhere. If you believe the estimates, we take more photos every two minutes than existed for the first hundred-and-fifty years after photography’s invention. In one sense, we are now fully immersed in an environment where we cannot be certain of the authenticity of anything.

Then again, Bigfoot and Loch Ness monster sightings are on a real decline.

I am uneasy in how easy Google is making synthesized photography. But those who suggest that photography has been, up to this point, a trustworthy depiction of reality also need to think a bit deeper.



Glenn Fleishman dives into Check In

At TidBITS, Glenn Fleishman takes a deep dive into one of iOS 17’s best (and most carefully implemented) features, Check In. It’s a feature that could lead to enormous improvements in security for lots of people, so long as they know it exists and how to use it:

Life can be dangerous but, for most people, most of the time, only in sporadic, unanticipated situations. No one expects to be in a car crash, mugged while walking home, or caught in a wildfire. Nevertheless, there are occasions when harm is more likely, such as when you’re in a neighborhood in which criminals expect they can waylay people late at night or are driving a long distance alone. Check In is designed to help in exactly these situations, alerting your safety partner if you don’t respond to your timer or arrive as planned. It could be especially beneficial for children traveling without adults present.

Send Glenn’s story to people you know and love so that they can use Check In to stay safe.


The WGA strike is over, so what does it mean? Also, your letters! [Downstream+ subscribers also get: Don’t blame the writers for the end of Peak TV, Max gets interesting, Amazon adds ads, and Disney ♥️ Charter.]


By John Moltz

This Week in Apple: Nothing can stay gold

John Moltz and his conspiracy board. Art by Shafer Brown.

We’ve got the hot news about search engines (I hear great things about that AltaVista), the woes of watch ownership, and we’ll catch up on all the -gates this side of Bill.

Browser’s Castle

Last week brought us the news that back in 2020 (is something that happened three years ago “news”?), Microsoft held exploratory meetings with Apple to discuss selling Bing. The deal did not happen largely because Google shoots a firehose of money at Apple in order to keep its search engine as the default on Apple’s platforms.

Also, something about “quality and capabilities”, yadda-yadda-yadda.

Apple, of course, didn’t let such trivialities concern it when it walked away from Google Maps back in 2012, but Google was demanding more user information. Which is why two years prior to discussing Bing with Microsoft, Apple was interested in making DuckDuckGo the default search engine for private mode in Safari, conducting around 20 meetings and phone calls with the company. Ironically, one of the reasons the company didn’t do the deal was that DuckDuckGo relies on Bing for search results.

All this information is brought to you by the U.S. government’s antitrust trial against Google. So, hug a federal agent the next time you see one. (Disclaimer: do NOT under any circumstances attempt to hug a federal agent. Even if they’re a family member.)

So, Apple didn’t use DuckDuckGo because of Bing. Then it didn’t buy Bing because of Google. Perfectly clear.

A Tale of Two Watches

Quick, what’s $17,000 divided by 8?

“Original Apple Watch, including $17,000 gold model, no longer eligible for repairs”

It’s tempting to laugh at people who bought an incredibly expensive watch that everyone knew was going to be deprecated at some point, but it’s likely that, for the people who actually bought a gold Apple Watch, its cost was a smaller portion of their net worth than a $399 aluminum Watch is of its average buyer’s net worth.

So, technically, the joke’s on us, not them.

Sssorry.

Is Apple end-of-lifing a $17,000 Watch that came out eight years ago better or worse than the fact that Google won’t repair a $280 one you bought yesterday?

“Google won’t repair cracked Pixel Watch screens”

What’s $280 divided by zero?

#DIV/0

Opening the FloodGates

A fun thing to do when you’re killing time is to see how fast you can name all the purported iPhone 15 scandals.

You got your Casegate, of course. That’s easy. Then there was Lipgate for a minute. Hotgate was hot for a while. That’s three. But have you heard about Bendgate 2, The Rebendening?

Bendgate 11 revolved around our plucky hero the iPhone 6 which, if you applied pressure to the center in one direction and the ends in the opposite direction would (I know this is a long sentence, are you still with me?)… bend.

Weird, but true.

Not to give too much away about the sequel but… (if you’re spoiler-averse you may want to skip ahead) I hear…

…this time it’s personal.

No, really. I heard that.

Fortunately, like kind of all of these (except Casegate), this appears to be much ado about nothing.

“Does the iPhone 15 Pro Max bend and crack easily? Consumer Reports says no”

Huh, looks like they build headlines out of all of Betteridge’s Law these days.

There’s even a video of Consumer Reports cracking an iPhone 15 Pro Max, if you can stand to watch it. I couldn’t. Horrible. Just horrible. How about a content warning next time, Consumer Reports?


  1. It’s actually Bendgate 4 in the planned Bendgate franchise but in order to understand the creators’ entire vision you have to watch a 45-minute YouTube video and who has time for that? 

[John Moltz is a Six Colors contributor. You can find him on Mastodon at Mastodon.social/@moltz and he sells items with references you might get on Cotton Bureau.]


Video

October Video Q&A

Time for the first of our monthly video Q&As, available only to subscribers at the More Colors or Backstage level.

Please send in your questions at sixcolors.com/morecolorqs or by typing /ask on Discord.


Tech support challenge!

Jason and Dan fell into the tech support hole this week. They both got answers—but not the ones they wanted.




Search Six Colors