Six Colors
Six Colors

Apple, technology, and other stuff

Support this Site

Become a Six Colors member to read exclusive posts, get our weekly podcast, join our community, and more!

December 24, 2020

The year in review—and can you believe we’re talking about Apple and cars again?


After the failure of the Macintosh Portable, Apple took a different approach to designing a laptop. The result helped tip the balance of power between humans and computers.


Politicians on Twitter, tech-related Advent calendars, Apple’s car ambitions, and how we’ve routed around 2020 for the holiday season.


Apple is definitely producing a car. Unless it’s not in which case it isn’t.


By Jason Snell

iPhone 12 mini & iPhone 12 Pro Max: Enjoyable extremes

Note: This story has not been updated since 2020.

It finally happened. I picked up a regular iPhone 12 the other day and recoiled at how large it was. My month-long inculcation into the cult of the iPhone 12 mini had done its job. I had learned to love little brother.

Apple’s one-size-fits-all approach to the iPhone worked for a very long time. But eventually the company realized that the iPhone needed to be more than a product—it needed to be a product line. And over the past few years, it’s been building out that product line—leading to late 2020 and its release of four distinctly different models in three distinct size classes.

The iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro share a size, if not features. But bracketing them are the two outliers, each sharing a set of features with one of the 6.1-inch phones back at home base.

Back in 1989 “Late Night with David Letterman” did a comedy bit that imagined a clichéd sitcom about a mismatched couple, “Big Tex and Little Rhody.”1 Big Tex was a Texas cowboy played by seven-foot-six NBA center Manute Bol, while Little Rhody was from Rhode Island and played by diminutive actress Charlene Tilton.

I don’t know why that bit has stuck with me for more than 30 years, but I’ve been thinking about it this fall for some reason. The iPhone 12 Pro Max is Big Tex. The iPhone 12 Mini is Little Rhody. Can these two star-crossed kids make it work in this kooky world?

Let’s get small

The iPhone started out small. And while it grew a little bit longer with the iPhone 5, Apple was extremely conservative when it came to iPhone design. The company’s famous commitment to keeping its laptops as thin and light as possible might have made it unwilling to envision a product category where users might want a bigger, heavier object.

Samsung had no such qualms, and it (along with other Android phone makers) discovered that a lot of people considered phones with bigger screens preferable to the ones with small, iPhone-sized ones. Apple finally got the message and released the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, and was met with a record-breaking surge in sales. Message received: the primary iPhone model has kept getting larger, while Apple has introduced several alternative models that were even larger.

But that moment of triumph for Apple, the release of the larger iPhone 6, was a little tragedy for a lot of iPhone users—the ones who didn’t feel that when it came to phones, bigger was better. Apple’s response was to keep the iPhone 5S around for a while, then upgrade its internals as the iPhone SE. Eventually, Apple moved along—and left people who didn’t really want a phone bigger than the iPhone 5S behind.

The iPhone 12 Mini (left) is only slightly larger than the first-generation iPhone SE (right).

At last, the iPhone 12 mini is here to address this corner of the market. Though making a smaller phone is clearly a low priority for Apple, one advantage of turning the iPhone from a product into a product line is that there’s room to serve the edge cases. The 12 mini isn’t quite as small as the iPhone 5—it’s 23 grams heavier, 5.6 millimeters wider, and 7.7 millimeters taller. But it’s as close as Apple’s ever going to get, and it brings with it all the modern conveniences, including Face ID and a nearly bezel-less 5.4-inch diagonal OLED display that puts the old model’s 4-inch display to shame.

Thanks to the new 2020 iPhone design language, itself a throwback to the iPhone 4/5 era, holding an iPhone 12 mini in my hand sure brings back all those iPhone 5 feelings. When I started using it full-time, though, I wasn’t convinced that I’d want to use a smaller phone. Unlike the iPhone SE die-hards, I had upgraded to the iPhone 6 size class, then the iPhone X, and just accepted the trade of a larger display in exchange for a phone that felt less comfortable to hold. After years of putting up with an awkward phone grip and basking in the glow of a big screen, would a smaller phone feel like coming home? Or would I have been so changed by the last six years that the phone I had desired would end up being a disappointment?

I’ll say this: I never felt disappointed by the iPhone 12 mini. Using it never made me feel like I had compromised in order to go smaller. After a month using the iPhone 12, moving to the 12 mini was easy—it’s the same phone, just in a smaller package. The question was, as I used the phone over weeks, would I end up in a situation where I suddenly regretted having the smaller model?

I kept waiting for this to happen, fully expecting to crash into the proverbial wall and expose some way that I had adapted to using a larger phone. I knew there would be an instructive moment when I’d miss having the bigger model, giving me perspective about the dividing line between choosing an iPhone 12 mini or its larger counterpart.

With the possible exception of the moment that I realized the iPhone 12 mini had rotated in my jeans pocket so that it fit sideways, it never happened. There were never any regrets.

My only real complaint about the iPhone 12 mini is shared with the larger iPhone 12: I think Apple made a mistake in making the second rear camera on these phones an ultrawide rather than a telephoto. The vast majority of the photos I take on my phone are using the standard “wide” lens, but I find myself very rarely using the ultrawide, which can take some strange distorted photos—and I miss having the telephoto lens that’s now standard only on the iPhone Pro models.

Do I miss it enough to opt for a phone that’s larger than the 12 mini, more expensive, and with a different design aesthetic that I don’t find pleasing? No. But if these non-Pro phones can only use two lenses, I still feel like Apple omitted the wrong one.

The rugged slab of photography

The iPhone 12 Pro Max offers an upgrade even above the cameras of the iPhone 12 Pro.

But what about Big Tex? The iPhone 12 Pro Max is the biggest iPhone ever made, by pretty much any measurement. And after I’ve spent a thousand words rhapsodizing about Apple’s tiny phone, you’d probably imagine that all I can do regarding the iPhone 12 Max is shrug and roll my eyes.

But no. I admire the iPhone 12 Pro Max for a lot of the same reasons I admire the iPhone 12 mini. The place of the iPhone 12 and 12 Pro at dead center in the iPhone product line gives the outliers the freedom to move confidently to the edges. The 12 mini is great because it doesn’t need to please everyone, just people who want a small phone.

And the iPhone 12 Pro Max is great because it is a phone designed without any real fear that it will be considered too big, too heavy, too bulky, or even too expensive. It’s an enormous slab of a device, dense and substantial—which is exactly what it should be. When I carry it, I feel like I’m holding a camera rather than a phone. If there ever was a phone that deserved to be called Pro, it’s this one.

The iPhone 12 Pro Max is an outlier in another way: It’s got a better camera than even the iPhone 12 Pro. The standard “wide” camera has an additional optical image stabilization system, and the telephoto camera has a bigger optical zoom. You buy more, you get more.

I think Apple should continue down this path with the Pro Max. Yes, it’s frustrating to have to decide between models, but why should Apple’s most expensive and largest iPhone be held back by the limitations of the other models? If there are improvements Apple can make in terms of camera hardware or just about anything else, and if they just don’t fit (literally) in smaller phones, it should make them to this dense slab and allow it to be the best it can be.

In practice, it seems like the improvements the 12 Pro Max has over the 12 Pro are extremely subtle, however. I recommend Austin Mann’s iPhone 12 Pro Max camera review, which shows off some improvements in low-light performance to go along with that extended zoom.

I am not much of a photographer, and in my experience the cameras on all the iPhone 12 models are excellent. HDR video is something to behold—and to play back on the phone displays. And ProRAW, available on both iPhone 12 Pro models, has huge potential to improve the workflows of pro photographers who use iPhone.

Perhaps the biggest improvement for photographers offered by the iPhone 12 Pro Max is its screen. It’s a 6.7-inch diagonal OLED display with 2778 by 1284 pixels. It’s huge, and that means you can see more of what you’ve got, or what you’re about to shoot, right there when you’re in the field.

Truth be told, the thing I miss most in using the iPhone 12 mini is the ability to get a big look at the pictures or video that I’ve shot. It might be obvious to say that the best thing about a big phone is that it’s got a big screen, but… there it is.

Separate ways, worlds apart

The whole family, as seen at an Apple Store.

So can Big Tex and Little Rhody make it work, despite their huge differences? The truth is, the iPhone 12 mini and iPhone 12 Pro Max are at remote ends of an ever-expanding iPhone product line. What makes them both great individually is that they’re free to be themselves, to appeal to people who demand the most—or the least—from their iPhone.

Most people will opt for the iPhone 12 or the iPhone 12 Pro. But anyone who has found themselves craving a smaller phone will be thrilled by the iPhone 12 mini. That’s definitely me—but I have to tip my cap to the iPhone 12 Pro Max, too. If it were just a big and ungainly duplicate of the iPhone 12 mini, it wouldn’t impress me much. But it embraces its size and density and offers the most of everything the iPhone has to offer.


  1. Big Tex and Little Rhody

     


It’s the Upgrade Holiday Special! But first, Myke reviews the AirPods Pro Max and Jason reviews Apple Fitness+. Then we get into the spirit of the season with a holiday-themed #askupgrade, and Myke watches “A Charlie Brown Christmas” for the very first time!


By Dan Moren for Macworld

Apple’s most significant moves of 2020

Goodbye, 2020, we won’t miss you.

Looking back over the last 12 months, it’s clearly been eventful for Apple—and that’s even without taking a global pandemic into account. The company has been busy, especially in the fall product season, but as the year draws to a close, it’s time to cast a gimlet eye over all the decisions the Cupertino-based company has made and—as is our annual tradition—pick out the ones that will ultimately have the largest impact on its future.

There were almost too many to choose from this year, but looking at a larger theme, I think it would be about Apple deciding to stretch itself, make some choices that we wouldn’t necessarily consider very Apple-like. Even if, in the end, those decisions were perhaps the most Apple-like of all.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Jason Snell

20 Macs for 2020: #2 — The original PowerBooks

Note: This story has not been updated since 2020.

PowerBook

In the early days, using a computer was something you did in a space dedicated for that task. You went to the computer lab. You sat at a computer desk. You had to get back to the office to write up that memo or story at the computer. Long after the earliest computers filled large rooms, personal computers were large boxes, usually with large displays set atop them, anchored to a desk or a table.

It should have been obvious from the very beginning that the final form of the personal computer would need to be portable. Why go to a designated computer location when you could do those things wherever it was convenient?

The drive toward portable computers started relatively early in the life of the PC, and by the early 1990s 13 percent of PC sales were laptops. PCs were at the beginning of a long, slow transition that would transform them from devices anchored at desks to ones that could travel wherever the user would take them. In the fall of 1991, that transition was spurred on by a new line of portables from Apple: the PowerBooks.

Apple was late to the mobile computing scene in 1989, offering a “luggable”—the Macintosh Portable—just as the makers of PCs were shifting to thinner, lighter models. The Mac Portable was a flop, but from its ashes rose one of Apple’s greatest triumphs ever.

Continue reading “20 Macs for 2020: #2 — The original PowerBooks”…


December 18, 2020

Facebook wants to save small businesses from Apple and rotten cherries are back in pies.


The first Mac followed in the Lisa’s footsteps and had a lot of limitations—but it changed the course of the computer industry forever.


The fast internet sham

Great story from Sean Hollister at The Verge about the shortcomings of broadband in the U.S. And why? You guessed it: lack of regulation!

In 2009, the US spent $350 million on a “National Broadband Map” that turned out to be nothing more than a chance for the wolves to guard the hens: it relied on ISPs like Comcast and AT&T to submit their own data, which the FCC does not audit.

As reliable as my Comcast service has been, it’s also gotten increasingly opaque. Trying to figure out what download speeds are associated with what plans is easy enough, but Comcast doesn’t publish upload speeds for those plans anywhere that I can find.

Moreover, as I’ve mentioned before I’m lucky to live in a city with choice between two cable providers; many surrounding towns and cities have only one. And the FCC has seemed to be asleep at the switch where regulation in this market is concerned, at a time when the Internet has become more critical than ever to millions of Americans trying to work and learn from home.



Web services that connect web services, HBO Max’s attempt to boost subscriptions, Apple Fitness+, and Facebook’s shot across Apple’s bow.


Behold, the majesty of HBO Max in full-screen mode on an M1 Mac

Keying off of the release of macOS Big Sur 11.1 Monday, Joe Rossignol at MacRumors wrote:

Another notable change mentioned in the update’s release notes is the ability for iPhone and iPad apps with non-resizable windows to enter full-screen mode on Macs with the M1 chip, which is particularly useful for video apps like HBO Max. macOS 11.1 also allows iPhone and iPad app windows to be switched between landscape and portrait orientations.

True story. macOS 11.1 does finally allow apps like HBO Max to go to full-screen, eliminating a major limitation.

Except…

Gross 4:3 iPad app window causing pillarbox of letterbox

The result is a “full screen” app that’s locked to the iPad’s 4:3 display orientation, meaning that while you can make the video playback bigger, it’s still going to be pillarboxed inside an old-school non-widescreen aspect ratio.

I know, I know, one step at a time. And at least HBO Max offers an app on the Mac, unlike most video streaming services out there.


‘Understanding ProRAW’

Ben Sandofsky of Halide has written a deep dive into understanding how the RAW image format works with a focus on Apple’s ProRAW additions and how Halide has adapted to work with it:

ProRAW stores results of computational photography right inside the RAW… Apple worked with Adobe to introduce a new type of tag into the DNG standard, called a “Profile Gain Table Map.” This data gives your editor everything it needs to know to tone map your photo image and end up with results identical to the first party camera. Because it’s separate data, you can turn down its strength, or turn it off completely.

This is a great overview about why something like the RAW format was needed, why photographers use it, and how Apple has cleverly tried to bridge the gap between the principles of RAW and its own in-camera smart processing of images. Even if you never use Halide (which is a really great app, by the way!), this story is worth your attention.


By Jason Snell

One day with Fitness+

Apple’s latest service, Fitness+, arrived on Monday, and over the last 24 hours I’ve pedaled to 80s hits, jumped around my living room in an introductory high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workout, and added a set of new exercises to work my core.

I am literally sweating the details for you, dear reader.

More seriously, I’m probably in the best cardiovascular shape I’ve been in since I was a student. This isn’t saying much, but after a couple of failed attempts at it, I’ve been running regularly for most of this year. I am the proverbial Couch to 5K person, having run two (virtual, alas) 5K races in 2020.

It’s the Apple Watch and AirPods that have really done the job for me. As I detailed during one of my first attempts to run regularly, I’ve managed to find a happy place running with just my cellular watch and AirPods, listening to podcasts via the Overcast watch app. I used the Couch to 5K schedule in Intervals Pro to guide my workouts until they transformed into “just run for X minutes,” at which point I switched over to Apple’s own workout app. These days I generally just try to go out into my neighborhood for two-mile runs two or three times a week.

The last couple of months, it’s been two times a week a lot more often than three, so I’ve begun wondering if I might want to officially replace that third run with some other kind of exercise routine. I have an old stationary bike, but pedaling idly while streaming “Deep Space Nine” wasn’t as great as I had hoped.

Fortunately, I have the AppleOne bundle, which is already saving me money on my existing Apple stuff—and Fitness+ comes with the bundle, free! (This is an interesting potential future path for Apple’s services strategy—loading more ancillary services that are tightly integrated with Apple’s other products into its services bundle, and perhaps being a little less concerned about how they fare as a standalone offering.)

This is all to say that I spent half an hour this morning pedaling my ancient recumbent exercise bike to the hits of the ’80s while being motivated by an extremely chipper trainer who was once a contestant on “The Amazing Race,” and I kind of loved it. This will not be news to anyone who has taken a spinning class or has become One With The Peleton, but it actually helps to spend your time exercising with someone who can guide you, motivate you, and make your endless pedaling feel like something more than a monotonous grind!

The Apple Watch feedback helps a lot, too. The service requires you to have an Apple Watch, and is integrated deeply with it. Seeing my heart rate appear live in the Fitness app was not only motivational but helpful in regulating my pace and my bike’s resistance level, keeping myself in the appropriate zone for whatever portion of the workout we were doing.

That was a full 30-minute workout, after which I needed to shower and change. But on Monday night I did a couple quick introductory courses on Core and HIIT, just on my living room floor, and I came away with the same impressions: Apple Watch integration is great, and having a good trainer to motivate you makes all the difference.

I’m really impressed with the production values of Fitness+ video courses, too. Not only are the presenters polished and friendly—I think they’ve been getting the same training as Apple’s tech executives—but the whole thing exudes the aesthetic we’ve come to expect from Apple. The videos look great, with brilliant lighting and a gorgeous set of backgrounds inside the Fitness+ studio in Santa Monica. So much wood! So many smiling, sweaty people! (Okay, maybe the WWDC presenters don’t glisten so much.)

The service comes with a free one-month trial, so if you’re an Apple Watch owner, it’s worth giving it a look and seeing if it might work for you. It’s definitely not for everyone—and there are also plenty of competitors out there—but it feels like Apple has made a credible entry that has the potential to help a lot of people become more fit.

I’ve already been doing my part while jogging around my neighborhood listening to podcasts—but maybe pedaling to The Fixx and The Go Go’s could be a nice addition to my routine.


Microsoft Office embraces M1, Big Sur

On Tuesday Microsoft announced that it’s releasing new versions of Microsoft Office that run native on Apple Silicon:

The new Office apps are Universal, so they will continue to run great on Macs with Intel processors. The apps are not only speedy, but they also look fantastic as they have been redesigned to match the new look of macOS Big Sur.

If you have automatic updates turned on, you will start to receive these updates today. Otherwise, you can go to the Mac App Store and click the Updates tab, or with Microsoft AutoUpdate, you can go to your Office app’s Help menu and choose Check for Updates. Plus, find more commonly asked questions on our support page.

In other Office news, Outlook now supports iCloud accounts. Unfortunately, Teams isn’t yet native on Apple silicon, though Microsoft says it’s working on it.


There’s a lot of streaming-media news this week, as Warner Media faces intense criticism of its decision to move all its 2021 film releases to HBO Max, Apple faces criticism for killing a show based on Gawker, and Disney fires off its Death Star, unveiling a slate of originals that are likely to take Disney+ to the next level. Oh, and Apple announced a $550 pair of headphones!


By Jason Snell

20 Macs for 2020: #3 – Macintosh 128K

Note: This story has not been updated since 2020.


My friend John Siracusa is disappointed in me because I didn’t put the Macintosh 128K—the original Macintosh—at number one in this list of the 20 most notable Macs of all time.

I certainly considered it. The original Macintosh changed the computer world forever. Without its presence, this series couldn’t exist. It is a seminal product in the history of technology.

Putting it at number one felt a bit obvious, though. And there’s this: While it came first, it had a lot of drawbacks—so many, in fact, that it was revised within a year. It was a remarkable first attempt, but for my money the Mac didn’t really settle down as a platform until the Mac SE arrived in 1987.

But still, it was first. And that counts for a lot.

Continue reading “20 Macs for 2020: #3 – Macintosh 128K”…


By Dan Moren for Macworld

How Apple sweats the security details—and sometimes gets it wrong

When it comes to Apple differentiating itself from its Big Tech rivals, there’s one area in which the company has spent a lot of time touting its record: security and privacy. From the App Store to HomeKit, Apple talks a lot about making sure that your data stays yours.

This might seem like a no-brainer. After all, we trust our devices with the most intimate details of our lives and we live those lives increasingly online. But while we might think about very obvious places that security is important (like making strong passwords or using two-factor authentication), there are plenty of other ways that our private data can leak out.

Sometimes that means making smaller changes, ones that may not be as understandable or as easily explainable to the average user, but can have just as many significant benefits in the long run. Even just in the past year, Apple has made a few of these moves to help improve security in ways that you may not be thinking about—as well as one or two that haven’t quite managed to help in the way intended.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦



Search Six Colors