Six Colors
Six Colors

Apple, technology, and other stuff

This Week's Sponsor

Magic Lasso Adblock: Block ads in iPhone, iPad, Mac and Apple TV apps

By gartenberg

Calls for Apple’s breakup are nonsensical

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

[Michael Gartenberg is a longtime industry analyst who previously worked at Apple. He’s the Contributing Analyst at Six Colors.]

Apple dominates the technology industry. Love it, hate it, admire it or stand in awe of it—in today’s world you can do anything but ignore them.

Recently there has been some chatter that perhaps Apple has become too successful. Perhaps now that Apple has become a trillion-dollar company it’s time for the government to step in and break Apple into pieces. Perhaps the folks in Cupertino are just too successful, thanks to the combined effect of Apple’s position in devices, music, apps and other services.

I am not a lawyer, much to my Mom’s chagrin, but I’ll venture in to this territory regardless.

As much as pundits like to believe that there are natural fracture lines between services, applications and hardware, the reality is that Apple is far more complex than that. Apple is, for all intents and purposes, an applied research company. It creates end-to-end solutions that make up a whole. Those solutions continue to surprise and delight users.

I also don’t believe that breaking up Apple into pieces would lower costs for users. In fact, the more likely scenario is higher costs. A sectioned-up Apple would likely split core parts of the ecosystem arbitrarily, potentially raising total cost and creating barriers to complex technologies working well together.

One of the big complaints users have about technology is that different products don’t work well—or at all—together. A break-up would make the user experience more hostile for everyone. All users will pay the added price of supporting the profit structures of multiple companies that don’t work seamlessly together.

If Apple split apart, who would benefit? Only Apple competitors who could react much faster without the constraints imposed on a split company. For Apple, future success won’t necessarily mean market dominance. The strength Apple achieved in the in the markets it plays in most won’t be repeated in the future. It wasn’t that long ago that the government wanted to break up Microsoft because of its industry dominance. While Microsoft remains a powerful and important company, it no longer constitutes the threat it once might have been. Breaking up Microsoft would have been disastrous to the company as it matured, turning from a dominant player to just one player among many.

Apple’s current successes are far from total dominance. Success without total dominance means there will always be strong players whose market positions will be large enough and stable enough to provide competition. A divided Apple would be unable to compete effectively in the rapidly changing technology industry. Today, many of its strengths are also its weaknesses, and many of the markets it would like to bring to market are new to it and other companies. Today’s rapid pace of technology, not the breakup of Apple, will serve to level the competitive playing field.

If Apple really is engaging in inappropriate behavior, it should be forced to change its conduct. Anything beyond that is a punishment that doesn’t fit the crime and doesn’t serve the public interest, Apple’s customers, or the industry at large.


By Dan Moren

Amazement at iOS cursor movement shortcut says a lot about discoverability

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

Over the past few days, I’ve seen a ton of people on Twitter (including plenty of folks I’d describe as pretty tech savvy) have their mind blown by a tweet explaining how to move the cursor on the iOS keyboard.

It is a handy tip, for sure, but not one that I, or probably most people who read this site, would consider particularly obscure. But there’s a confluence of reasons why this is making waves at this particular moment, and I thought it might be interesting to break down why as well as what it might mean for Apple and iOS.

It’s not a new feature…except it is

This cursor-movement feature first debuted with the iPhone 6s, where it was one of the most lauded capabilities of 3D Touch. Force pressing anywhere on the keyboard would essentially turn the whole thing into a trackpad, allowing you to drag your finger to move the cursor and even select text.

Previously, the only way to move the cursor so was to directly tap the place in the text you’d like it to be—which was hit or miss, given the size of most of our fingers—or, for more precise movement, tap and hold to use the magnifying loupe introduced way back in the iPhone’s earliest days.

Around the same time, Apple also added this trackpad feature to the iPad, but since the tablet has never had 3D Touch capabilities, it went with an alternate mechanic: tapping and holding on the keyboard with two fingers.

However, despite that, older iPhones without 3D Touch have never had this trackpad mode…until Apple added a similar feature in this year’s iOS 12. Now if you have a device that doesn’t support 3D Touch—and I believe this includes the new iPhone XR—you can tap and hold on the spacebar and slide your finger to move the cursor.

That interface isn’t exactly new, either. Google’s Gboard third-party keyboard for iOS has the same mechanic, and I believe many Android devices use that functionality as well.

The more you don’t know

This has raised a number of questions about feature discoverability. After all, there’s nothing particularly obvious about pressing and holding the spacebar to move the cursor—there’s no inherent semantic reason why the spacebar should be connected to cursor movement; it’s simply a convenient place to put the feature because it’s a large, centrally located key that’s present on most keyboards.1

3D Touch itself is not the most discoverable of features. While users may have encountered it in triggering the flashlight or camera shortcuts on some iPhones’ lock screens, or perhaps even stumbled across it by accidentally pressing too hard on their screens, it’s not well explained or laid out by Apple. Even having found it, some users may not quite get what they’ve found.

Moreover, the company’s most recently released phone, the XR, doesn’t support 3D Touch, instead using a similar feature called Haptic Touch—which doesn’t work everywhere 3D Touch does.

So, complicating the discoverability of this feature is that Apple has three separate mechanics for the same cursor movement feature on 3D Touch iPhones, non-3D Touch iPhones, and iPads. That is a little bit bananas, and has led to confusion and more than a few inane arguments on social media.

But at the root of this issue is that this feature is not necessarily well known, not because it hasn’t been written about or discussed, but because it’s not discoverable—which is to say, if you were not aware that such a feature existed, how would you ever know to go looking for it in the first place? Certainly, those folks who seek out every tech detail or hint might come across it online, or those people might tell their friends, but it’s not something one is likely to just come across. It’s up there with Shake to Undo, which is also pretty undiscoverable, and possibly the “tap the status bar to go to the top of a list” shortcut.

The evolution of iOS

This points to a larger, more fundamental issue cropping up with iOS as the platform becomes more mature: how do you add functionality and make it easily discoverable?

Some of the challenge here is simply because of iOS’s constraints: Where on the smaller screen can you add more features that would be easy to discover? But another challenge is how the OS is architected. The Mac nearly always treated the menu bar as a “safe” zone to which you could always retreat if you needed to find a command. There’s no real analogue to that on iOS, with the exception perhaps of the status bar, which isn’t, aside from the aforementioned “jump to the top” feature, an interactive element.

I think this is a big part of the challenge Apple is dealing with as it continues to evolve and push iOS forward. iOS has made easy so many things that used to be difficult or require a lot of technical know-how, but as we ask more from our devices and as developers deliver it, we lose some of that initial pared-down elegance that Apple sought.

And, I’d argue, this is one reason the feature isn’t particularly discoverable: it’s a bolt-on that Apple added later after trying to essentially do away with what it probably considered and old outmoded interaction model—after all, the cursor system has been around for longer than many of us have been alive.

It’s not too different from the way that Apple aimed to avoid having users interact with files on iOS; there too, it eventually had to relent and add file management features. With iOS, Apple has attempted to push the computing model forward, dropping some of the cruft it has acquired over the last several decades. In large part, it’s succeeded—but it turns out that some of the old ways of doing things were there for a reason, meaning Apple had to reclaim the baby from the bathwater.

I’m not sure exactly what the fix is for this situation. Maybe it’s as simple as Apple providing a better tutorial experience for letting people know that these otherwise hard-to-find features exist. Or perhaps it’s as complex as finding a different way to design this functionality. Either way, it’s clearly a feature that people need and want2, so it shouldn’t go anywhere.

On the Mac, Apple long eschewed the addition of hard-to-discover features, such as contextual menus or keyboard shortcuts not listed in the menus.3 But it eventually gave in on many of those fronts as we all became more conversant with the conventions of computing.

Maybe that’s the direction this spacebar cursor movement is going: eventually it’ll just be something that everybody knows about and has accepted as “that’s just how it works”. Then again, maybe it’s another opportunity to look at how iOS is ready for the future.


  1. This wasn’t always the case on iOS keyboards; you used to have some that didn’t have spacebars, such as entering URLs, but those seem to have largely fallen by the wayside. 
  2. I use it all the time, but I’d argue that it can be a bit too finicky and annoying to control. 
  3. There have been some exceptions. The ability to move through text using the Command and/or Option keys in conjunction with the cursors, as well as selecting text by throwing Shift into the mix is still not well documented. 

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By Dan Moren

Tim Cook interviewed by Axios

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

Interesting interview with the Apple CEO, in particular where they ask him about why he’s comfortable having Google be the default search engine on iOS, despite his overall concerns about data privacy.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


November 16, 2018

Jason can’t go outside, but we’re still writing things and selling merchandise.


By Dan Moren for Macworld

3 features from other Apple products that the Mac and iPhone need

Every year, it seems like Apple comes out with at least one significant new implementation of technology. The issue is that it isn’t always distributed evenly across the company’s product line-up. Even devices that seem like they could benefit from Apple’s latest and greatest additions often get left out in the cold.

That’s particularly frustrating, given that one of Apple’s strongest selling points in recent years has been how well all of its technology works together across hardware, software, and services. Bringing that kind of relationship to its devices really emphasizes the idea of the ecosystem being a whole, instead of independent platforms.

With that in mind, here are three places where I think Apple could bring one of its technologies to another one of its platforms.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


Lex bought an Echo Spot and Moltz says good luck with that: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B073SQYXTW?tag=mh0b-20&hvadid=78546412580719&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_9cv60cpes2_e
Some users have had to reset their Apple IDs: https://www.macrumors.com/2018/11/13/locked-out-apple-ids/
Apple and Amazon agree on deal to sell Apple products: https://www.macrumors.com/2018/11/09/apple-amazon-new-product-deal/
Lex uses RoboKiller: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/robokiller-spam-call-blocker/id1022831885?mt=8
Dan uses Hiya: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hiya-caller-id-and-block/id986999874?mt=8
Lex and Dan use Dark Sky: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/dark-sky-weather/id517329357?mt=8
Moltz and Dan use Carrot Weather: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/carrot-weather/id961390574?mt=8
Our thanks to Casper (https://casper.com/therebound) for sponsoring this episode. You spend about a third of your life sleeping, make sure it’s on a good mattress. Go to casper.com/therebound to start your 100-day money-back trial. You’ll get $50 off by using the code “REBOUND”.
And our thanks to the National Security Agency. The National Security Agency plays a big role in protecting us from foreign cyber operations, and you can help! If you work in computer science, networking, programming or electrical engineering, learn more about careers at the National Security Agency by visiting IntelligenceCareers.gov/NSA (http://intelligencecareers.gov/nsa).


By Jason Snell for Macworld

Why the MacBook Air might spell the end of configurable Macs

There’s been a lot written about the potential merging together of the software that runs (and runs on) the Mac and the iPad. 2019 is shaping up to be a huge year, as Apple’s devices get closer together than they’ve ever been before.

But while the focus on Apple’s smooshing together of its platforms has been primarily about the software (iOS apps running on the Mac) and hardware (the potential of future Macs running Apple-designed ARM processors), the new MacBook Air got me thinking about another way Apple’s approach to iPads and iPhones may dramatically change how we shop for Macs in the future.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Jason Snell

iPad Pro 2018 review: A computer, not a PC

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

You have to judge a product on what it is.

In starting the pricing of the 2018 iPad Pro models at $799 and $999, in comparing the power of the A12X chip inside to PC laptops, in replacing the Lightning port of previous iOS devices with the USB-C port found on Mac and PC devices, Apple is sending a clear message: The iPad Pro is not meant to be a toy or a curiosity or an alternate device. It is just as serious a device as a computer, Apple suggests, and if that’s true we should judge it accordingly.

But just because the iPad Pro needs to be taken as seriously as a computer doesn’t mean it should be judged as a PC. The iPad is not a computer, not as the term’s been defined for the past 40 years. It’s something new and different, and it excels in some ways that PCs don’t while also struggling to do some things that PCs do well.

No, the iPad Pro can’t do everything a PC can do—nor should we expect it to, because it’s not a PC. If you choose to use an iPad Pro rather than a MacBook or a Windows laptop, you are presumably doing so because some aspect of the iPad Pro makes it more appealing than those products. In other words, there’s something else it does better than those devices, making it worth the trade-off.

Better is to judge the iPad on what it is—and where its potential lies. While it’s misguided to consider the iPad’s path incomplete until it turns itself into a PC, it’s fair to ask if the spectacular hardware Apple’s developed here is being let down by its software.

The iPad Pro isn’t a PC, and shouldn’t be judged as such. It’s something new, and different. But being new and different doesn’t mean it gets a free pass. It’s still got to measure up.

You have to judge a product on what it is.

Continue reading “iPad Pro 2018 review: A computer, not a PC”…


By Jason Snell for Tom's Guide

4 iPad Features That Apple Should Bring to the iPhone

Most of the time, the iPhone stands at center stage in the iOS world. But every now and then, the iPad gets a moment. With this week’s release of new iPad Pro models, people are talking about Apple’s tablet and its laptop-equivalent power and price. The debate about whether the iPad can ever truly serve as a replacement for a conventional PC rages on.

But let’s take a break from all that talk about iPads and PCs and instead ponder a different question: What is Apple doing on the iPad that could, one day, benefit the iPhone?

The new iPad Pro inherits numerous features from the iPhone X family of devices, including Face ID, shrunken-down bezels for an edge-to-edge look, a Liquid Retina display reminiscent of the iPhone XR’s screen, a version of the A12 processor and the absence of a headphone jack. But it’s also not hard to imagine the iPad leading its smaller iOS cousin in a few new product directions.

Continue reading on Tom's Guide ↦


November 9, 2018

Live from an iPad Pro!


By Dan Moren for Macworld

Chips ahoy: The Mac’s transition to Apple processors is happening sooner than you think

The recent Apple event in New York City had a lot going on, and we’re still working through all the new products the company showed off. But as the dust clears, there’s one lasting impression about which I feel remarkably certain.

There’s a sea change coming.

John Gruber alluded to this in his piece at Daring Fireball about the new MacBook Air:

Look at the iPad’s A12X compared to the iPhone’s A12 and you can see how much attention Apple is paying to the iPad’s system architecture. There’s no reason they won’t pay as much or more attention to the Mac’s custom silicon when they switch from Intel to their own chip designs. It should be downright glorious.

That line in the middle, delivered in a matter-of-the-fact fashion, has stuck with me. Not “if they switch.” “When.”

Like many other Apple watchers, I’m considering this transition a foregone conclusion. I’ve already put a stake in the ground that Apple will ship a Mac with custom silicon by 2020 at the absolute latest, and I stand by that.

The question is: which Mac goes first? There are, to my mind, two major contenders in this space.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


Marco Arment’s review of the 2018 Mac mini: https://marco.org/2018/11/06/mac-mini-2018-review
John Gruber’s review of the 2018 MacBook Air: https://daringfireball.net/2018/11/the_2018_retina_macbook_air
Gruber’s commentary on Dan Frakes’s move to Apple: https://daringfireball.net/linked/2018/11/02/frakes-mac-app-store
Our thanks to Legacybox (http://legacybox.com/rebound) the world’s largest, most trusted, digitizer of home movies and photos. There’s never been a better time to digitally preserve your old home movies, film reels, and photos. Go to Legacybox.com/REBOUND to get 40% off your first order!
Our thanks as well to Indochino (https://www.Indochino.com) where you’ll find the best made to measure shirts and suits at a great price. Use the promo code “REBOUND” and get any premium suit for just $359.
And our thanks to the National Security Agency. The National Security Agency plays a big role in protecting us from foreign cyber operations, and you can help! If you work in computer science, networking, programming or electrical engineering, learn more about careers at the National Security Agency by visiting IntelligenceCareers.gov/NSA (http://intelligencecareers.gov/nsa).


By Dan Moren

Second Star Wars live action series will follow Cassian Andor

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

If it seems like just a couple weeks ago that we were getting news on Jon Favreau’s live action Star Wars series, The Mandalorian, that’s because it…was. But Disney has already announced it’s working on a second live action series set in the Star Wars universe, this one following Rogue One‘s Cassian Andor. Actor Diego Luna will return to the role for the show, which will center on espionage adventures prior to the events of Rogue One, for obvious reasons.

Honestly, I was just thinking about Cassian the other day and how I was bummed we wouldn’t get more about him. That said, I’m fascinated to see how they draw his character; when we meet him in Rogue One, he’s not exactly the nicest of guys. Will this be a darker series in tone?

Given Solo‘s apparently disappointing box office and the death of the Boba Fett movie, this seems to point to Disney repositioning Star Wars into a serialized TV format. (This makes three series, including the currently airing Resistance animated show, and not including the forthcoming conclusion to the Clone Wars series).

In some ways, that pivot’s no surprise, given the era of Peak TV we live in now, plus the ability to build ongoing original content for the company’s upcoming streaming service. The question is whether viewers will show up for this content in a way that they didn’t necessarily for the feature films. Right now Disney’s Episode IX is still scheduled for December 2019, and there is a trilogy in development from The Last Jedi‘s Rian Johnson as well as some number of films from Game of Thrones producers David Benioff and D.B. Weiss–but little is known about any of those movies.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


2018 Mac mini RAM replacements feasible, but not simple

Update: The guide linked below uses some pictures from the 2014 Mac mini model, and though they are apparently similar to the 2018 in many ways, those looking to do their own upgrades will be better served by waiting for an official guide from iFixit.

Glad as we all are to see Apple didn’t solder the RAM to the motherboard in its latest Mac mini update, the process still isn’t as simple as in days of yore. Rod Bland has posted a guide on iFixit detailing the process, which requires a few specialized tools.

I’ve upgraded Mac minis in the past, and while everything is friendlier than the first models, which famously required a putty knife to open, this is yet another reminder that the days of easily upgradable computers are waning. It’ll be interesting to see what the company’s forthcoming Mac Pro looks like in this department.


By Jason Snell for Macworld

The rules of magnetic attraction in Apple products

magnets-pencil

There was a time when magnets were the most terrifying things in computing. Magnets erased floppy disks and tape cassettes and even hard drives. But in the modern era, magnets are our friends. Apple has used them for various important tasks over the years, from the convenient breakaway charging cable of MagSafe to the sensor that knows you’ve closed your MacBook’s lid—and the attraction that helps keep it closed.

But in the last few years, Apple has brought the rules of magnetic attraction to the Apple Watch, the iPhone, and now the iPad. How do they work? You don’t need to know to appreciate what magnets do for modern Apple devices. And that goes double for the new iPad Pro, with its 102 magnets—as cited in Apple’s launch video about the product, no less—and all of the magnetic accessories that go along with it.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


Digging into Apple’s custom silicon

Ars Technica’s Samuel Axon scored an interview with Apple’s Phil Schiller and Anand Shimpi all about Apple’s custom silicon in the new iPad Pro. It’s an interesting read, and a rare dive into the nitty gritty technical details.

The iPad Pro outperforms every MacBook Pro we tested except for the most recent, most powerful 15-inch MacBook Pro with an 8th generation Intel Core i9 CPU. Generally, these laptops cost three times as much as the iPad Pro.

“You typically only see this kind of performance in bigger machines—bigger machines with fans,” Shimpi claimed. “You can deliver it in this 5.9 millimeter thin iPad Pro because we’ve built such a good, such a very efficient architecture.”

Ars also gets into the more interesting context to these chip discussions: namely, how does Apple’s venture into custom silicon affect the future of the Mac? That remains one of the most interesting and exciting potential stories of—likely—the next year or two, so it’s interesting to pick up the breadcrumbs here and there.


By Jason Snell

MacBook Air review: Center of the Mac world?

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

Think back to the fall of 2010. The iPad was just a few months old, and Apple introduced a new design for the MacBook Air. The previous model was an impressively thin and light laptop (that could famously fit in a mailing envelope), but it was expensive and had a single USB port concealed beneath a weird flip-down door. But the new models—and there were two, at 13 and 11 inches—were entirely different. They were still thin and light, but now they offered two USB ports and a new wedge-shaped design.

In that moment, the MacBook Air went from being a bit of an oddball to being the heart and soul of the Mac laptop line—and since two-thirds of Mac sales are laptops, it’s probably safe to say that the MacBook Air is the definitive Mac of this decade. For the past eight years, its exterior design has largely remained unchanged, as other products have come and gone.

Just when we thought it was dead, after several years of essentially no updates, the MacBook Air has returned with a new version that’s clearly inspired by the classic design. It’s been so long since the last major MacBook Air update, in fact, that most of the “new” features on this device are simply a recap of all the changes Apple has made to other Macs the past few years, finally rolled into this one: a new keyboard, Retina display, Force Touch trackpad, Apple-designed T2 processor, USB-C/Thunderbolt 3, “Hey Siri”, and Touch ID.

Surprise! The definitive Mac of the 2010s is going to survive this decade. And while this MacBook Air is dramatically different from previous models in many ways, it’s also got a bunch of familiar touches that make it undeniably a MacBook Air. Like its predecessors, it’s not the computer for everyone… but it will probably be the most popular laptop among the (count ’em) six models Apple currently offers.

Continue reading “MacBook Air review: Center of the Mac world?”…


The new space gray Mac mini (top) with its silver second-generation predecessor.

By Jason Snell

Mac mini 2018 review: The Swiss army knife of Macs returns

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

When the Mac mini was introduced at Macworld Expo in 2005, what caught the eye was the $499 base price, the lowest price ever for a Mac1. In an era where the iPod was in the process of entirely rehabbing the Apple brand in the eyes of the general public, the Mac mini was for switchers--people who decided that the iPod was so good, maybe a computer made by Apple would be better than whatever PC they were using right then.

It was a good idea, and I suspect that the Mac mini drove a lot of switchers--or at least got them into an Apple Store, where perhaps they ended up walking out with an iMac instead.

Apple and the Mac are in very different place today, though. Most of the Macs it sells are laptops. The concept of the low-end desktop switcher feels outmoded. (Which is not to say there aren't any, just that there maybe aren't as many as there might have been in 2005.)

In the intervening 13 years, the Mac mini has become something different. As the one Mac without a built-in monitor that isn't an expensive and large Mac Pro, it's become a bit of a Swiss army knife, fitting as a tiny Internet or file server (I've had a Mac mini running in my house more or less constantly for more than a decade), running lights and audio in theaters and at rock concerts, and thousands of other small niches that are vitally important for the people who live in them.

Just last week, hours after an Apple media event, I found myself in an edit bay at the offices of Stitcher in midtown Manhattan, recording a podcast. The multi-microphone, multi-display audio setup was powered by--you guessed it--a Mac mini.

Apple has witnessed how the Mac mini has gone from being the best Mac it could build for $499 to one that's a vital tool for professional and home users in a variety of contexts. And so, after a long time in the wilderness, the Mac mini has at last been updated--the right way. The last time the Mac mini got updated, Apple took away the highest-end configurations. This time, the Mac mini has been built with those many niche uses in mind.


  1. For the record, you had to pay an additional $50 for Bluetooth, $79 for Wi-Fi, and $100 for a SuperDrive, and you could max out the Mac mini at $1200 if you tried. 

Continue reading “Mac mini 2018 review: The Swiss army knife of Macs returns”…


November 2, 2018

We’re close to the finish line. But we’re not there yet.


By Dan Moren for Macworld

4 Apple products and technologies that are running out of time

What is dead may never die, as the Ironborn of Game of Thrones are fond of saying. This week, Apple resurrected both the MacBook Air and the Mac mini at its event, proving that death is sometimes only a temporary state of affairs–at least where tech products are concerned.

But just as this week’s Apple event giveth, there’s also the suggestion that it might taketh away; some Apple products and technologies find themselves in limbo after the announcements of the week, meaning that the writing may perhaps be on the wall for them.

Of course, not all of these products and technologies will die immediately–some may linger on for a while yet, and a few of them may not stay dead. (As the Air and mini showed us, sometimes they’re just hibernating.) But Apple has a habit of being brutal when it comes to cutting the dead weight from its lineup, even when it comes to killing those things that it once considered its darlings.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦



Search Six Colors