Six Colors
Six Colors

Apple, technology, and other stuff

This Week's Sponsor

Clic for Sonos: The fastest native Sonos client for iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, Apple TV, and visionOS.

The next version of Coda won’t be Coda

Panic, maker of fine software like Transmit and Coda, is preparing a major update to its soup-to-nuts web development app, Coda. But there’s a catch:

Yes, the next Coda is so different it won’t even be called Coda.

Frankly, we were worried that developers may have tried Coda in the past, decided it wasn’t for them, and written the app off forever. This new version is so new, it deserves a fresh start.

And then, incredibly, a new Coda arrived on the scene – a reimagined document at coda.io – and we reached an agreement to let them have the name. They’re Coda now. And we’re free to look to the future.

So the next Coda won’t be “Coda”. So what will it be?

The end of an era, but also the beginning of an era! Panic’s software is always excellent, and I expect that this new Coda, by any other name, will smell as sweet.1


  1. Don’t smell your software. 

By Jason Snell for Macworld

The web at 30: Apple’s place in history

This week marks the 30th anniversary of the web, or at least the date that Tim Berners-Lee made a proposal at the Swiss particle physics lab CERN involving the creation of a hypertextual system that would end up becoming the web as we know it today.

The history of web browsers on Apple devices takes a lot of twists and turns. Fortunately, I’ve been around for most of them—in fact, my first magazine cover story ever was in July 1996 about the first big browser war. You might be surprised just how much impact Apple has had on the development of the web itself.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


by Jason Snell

Ben Thompson on Elizabeth Warren’s tech breakup proposal

Today Ben Thompson takes apart presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to break up big tech companies, and then starts to put it back together. It’s a great, in-depth piece and I recommend that you read the whole thing, but I want to call out a little bit about Apple:

…do consumers not matter at all here? Is Senator Warren seriously proposing that smartphone be sold with no apps at all? Was Apple breaking the law when they shipped the first iPhone with only first-party apps? At what point did delivering an acceptable consumer experience out-of-the-box cross the line into abusing a dominant position? This argument may make sense in theory but it makes zero sense in reality.

What is even more striking, though, is that the App Store does have a massive antitrust problem: it is not Apple unfairly competing with app developers, it is Apple unfairly imposing massive complexity and extracting 30% of revenue with its contractual requirement, enforced by App Review, that developers use Apple’s payment mechanism…

The important takeaway for this article, though, is the degree to which Senator Warren missed the point: there is significant consumer benefit both to having preinstalled apps and also to Apple controlling the installation of apps. There is a big benefit to suppliers (app developers) as well: the app market on PCs died in large part due to security concerns, which Apple obviated with the App Store to the tremendous benefit of every participant in the ecosystem. Senator Warren’s proposal would make the App Store worse for everyone.

When I saw Nilay Patel’s brief interview with Warren I had the same reaction—she seems to be suggesting “solutions” to things that aren’t problems, all in the name of sticking it to the big guys. As Thompson writes, “Tech is a means, not an end, but Senator Warren’s approach presumes the latter. That is why she proposes the same set of rules for the sale of toasters and the sale of apps, and everything in between.”

Read through Thompson’s piece and you’ll see him identify numerous areas where giant tech companies could be restrained, including their voracious acquisitions of any company that might possibly threaten them in the future. This is the trick with stuff like this—a lot of people can agree that the tech industry is out of control, but when it comes to legislation, it’s all about the details. Thompson makes a forceful argument that Warren has many of the details wrong.


Apple Event confirmed for March 25

Get ready… in two weeks’ time Apple will be having an event in Cupertino at the Steve Jobs Theater that will presumably feature new subscription services, including an introduction of its new video service.

Set your calendars: March 25, 10 am PDT.



March 8, 2019

(This message has no content.)


By Dan Moren for Macworld

Three improvements Apple should make to its Mail app on iOS and macOS

When people roll out wish lists of things they wish Apple would do to its products, they’re often focused on brand new features. We all like new features, sure, but part of me worries that while the focus is on the shiny, the basics–the software that we’re all using everyday–gets ignored. In particular, I’m really ready for Apple to tackle that old standby: Mail.

I know: email’s dead, supplanted by a myriad of other means of digital communication. Except, for many of us, email is still something that we’re unavoidably attached to when it comes to corresponding with people, signing up for accounts, and archiving or doing a to-do list.

Apple expended a lot of effort developing tools in iOS 12 that let us spend less time on our devices by preventing us from using them at certain times. But what about all that time where we are using our smartphones, tablets, and computers? Maybe there are features that can help us be more efficient, and treat our time with the respect it deserves.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Jason Snell

Encyclopedia Netflixia: Translating Warner Media’s Robert Greenblatt

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

So the other day Robert Greenblatt, the new chairman of Entertainment at Warner Media, where he’s in charge of HBO, TNT, TBS, truTV, and the forthcoming Warner Media streaming service, said something to NBC’s Dylan Byers about Netflix that got people tittering: “Netflix doesn’t have a brand,” he said. “It’s just a place you go to get anything — it’s like Encyclopedia Britannica. That’s a great business model when you’re trying to reach as many people on the planet as you can.”

In the aftermath I’ve seen lots of folks stepping up to defend Encyclopedia Britannica(!) and Netflix. Maybe Greenblatt’s statement isn’t the most artfully worded. If you want to point and laugh, Nelson style, you can. Netflix is wildly successful… it’s not just a brand, it’s a powerful cultural force, the kind that can fill thrift stores after the launch of a show about de-cluttering, when it’s not winning multiple Academy Awards.

But I think I understand what Greenblatt is getting at. In fact, I wrote something similar earlier this week at Macworld:

Apple’s not Netflix and it isn’t going to be. There’s nothing wrong with Apple’s executives having a clear vision about what the vibe of their content should be. For Apple’s video service to be successful, it should be a set of programs that fit a particular worldview. The best networks have an identity and their programmers know exactly what it is.

Netflix tries to be everything to everybody, and spends tens of billions of dollars to do that. So far, as I can tell, Apple’s not going that direction. It needs to choose. Apple’s video service will benefit from a clear brand identity, and if that brand identity is bright, optimistic, and broadly appealing, with standards more like broadcast TV than premium cable, that won’t preclude it from finding an audience.

In other words, unless you spend tens of billions of dollars on original content over the course of a decade—and other than Netflix, the only other player even close to that level right now is Amazon—you can’t be Netflix. Netflix’s target audience is everyone. It casts the widest possible net. It is launching every kind of show and movie, by the dozen, every single week of the year.

Smaller players just entering the streaming market are not going to be capable of out-Netflixing Netflix for years, if ever. Instead, they all need to pick their spots carefully, and spend their money wisely. New streaming services must define who they are, what kind of content they’re going to offer, and market themselves to a specific potential audience.

Greenblatt doesn’t seem to be insulting Netflix to me. He’s praising, or at least acknowledging, that Netflix is playing a different game—and he’s planting seeds now to fend off any comparisons between his streaming service and Netflix later. Nobody’s going to be matching Netflix—not Warner Media, not Apple, not even Disney—for years to come. They will all lose a comparison to Netflix. The only winning move is not to play.


By Jason Snell

Prioritizing the MacBook Hierarchy of Needs

Note: This story has not been updated for several years.

MacBook 2015 keyboard
The keyboard that started it all.

This week on the Accidental Tech Podcast, John Siracusa floated the concept of a MacBook Hierarchy of Needs, a priority list of features for the next time Apple redesigns the MacBook line, as is rumored to happen later this year.

It’s a fun thought experiment, because it requires you to rank your wish list of laptop features. That’s important, because if I’ve learned anything in this wacky world of ours, it’s that you can never get everything you ask for, so you’ve got to prioritize.

The ATP hosts all made a “good keyboard” their top priority, an idea that would’ve been surprising a few years ago but now is almost a given. Yes, of course, Apple laptops need to be fast and reliable and have great displays and good battery life, but the past few years’ worth of MacBooks have made a lot of people realize the truth: a bad/unreliable laptop keyboard isn’t something you can really work around if you’re a laptop user.

This is why a lot of nice-to-have-features, like SD card slots, have to fall way down the hierarchy of needs. Any feature that can be rectified with an add-on adapter falls immediately to the bottom of the list. You’re stuck with a laptop keyboard forever, and if you’re committed to the Mac and every single Mac laptop that’s sold uses the exact same keyboard, there’s nowhere to run.

As I wrote back in 2017:

Apple’s mistake isn’t that it designed a clever new keyboard that decreases travel while increasing tactile feedback in order to make the MacBook ultra thin—it’s that it made a keyboard without broad appeal and then forced it into all of its new laptop designs. I love Apple’s tendency to make bold design decisions, but as the single hardware vendor on the Mac platform, Apple’s designers have a responsibility to create features that don’t leave users with nowhere to turn. Better to make a keyboard that nobody loves (but everyone can use) than something loved by a quarter of users, met with indifference by half, and despised by the remaining quarter.

If Apple designed a weird keyboard, or mouse, or trackpad for an iMac, it would be annoying, but you could just buy a replacement from a third party. You can add a DVD drive or a SD card reader or any other reader for a media type Apple has deemed uncool via USB. But a laptop’s keyboard is fundamental to its identity. It’s not the place for bold new directions, it’s a place for boring and reliable. Apple and its users are still living down a decision made several years ago now.

It’s a little unfair for me to even attempt to create my own MacBook Hierarchy of Needs, in large part because I no longer travel with a Mac laptop, instead opting for an iPad. But I think that decision says something about my priorities. My iPad isn’t limited to an Apple-supplied keyboard. I can use Apple’s Smart Keyboard Folio, or a Brydge laptop-style keyboard (when they arrive this spring), or literally any other Bluetooth or USB keyboard I want. It’s a relief.

Still, if I were to rank a hierarchy of MacBook needs, it would start with all the things that users can’t change later, and that are important to laptop users. The keyboard, yes, and also the display. As the ATP hosts pointed out, there’s a possibility that this rumored 16-inch MacBook Pro might actually have a display capable of displaying true native Retina resolution, rather than the scaled default found on all Retina MacBooks.

I might love an SD card slot and a return of MagSafe and for Apple to keep the headphone jack around, but in the end, there are adapters that will bridge those gaps if need be. No adapter will solve the problem of an unreliable or unpleasant keyboard or replace a display. That’s where Apple must supply something that works for everyone—and if the needs of its users are varied, it should offer a variety of products that can fulfill those needs. A one-size-fits-all approach can work, but only if you’re really successful with the choices you make. With the 2015 MacBook keyboard design, Apple missed the mark—and still forced the result into every single new laptop it designed.

Here’s hoping that Apple has spent the last few years coming up with its own hierarchy of MacBook needs, and that it recognizes that it must tread lightly when it comes to the features that its users have no choice but to accept.


Dan’s new book is out: https://www.amazon.com/Bayern-Agenda-Book-Galactic-Cold/dp/0857668196/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1551813978&sr=8-1-fkmrnull
Corning is working on foldable glass just to show Dan: https://www.macrumors.com/2019/03/05/apple-supplier-corning-foldable-glass-display/
iFixit says Apple has quietly fixed the footlighting issue on some MacBook Pros: https://ifixit.org/blog/13979/apples-2018-macbook-pros-attempt-to-solve-flexgate-without-admitting-it-exists/
Dan would like to thank Dave Nanian for his help. He makes SuperDuper! https://shirt-pocket.com
Apple acquires Lighthouse AI’s patents: https://www.macrumors.com/2019/03/04/apple-lighthouse-ai-patent-purchase/
Apple has also acquired PullString: https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/15/apple-buys-pullstring-toytalk/
The researcher who found the Keychain bug gave it to Apple despite the company not giving bounties for macOS bugs: https://www.macrumors.com/2019/03/04/researcher-gives-apple-details-of-macos-keychain-security-flaw-despite-no-mac-bug-bounty-program/
Google also shared a high severity macOS kernel bug: https://www.macrumors.com/2019/03/04/google-details-macos-kernel-flaw/
A former member of Apple’s legal team was charged with insider trading: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/02/13/sec-charges-former-apple-exec-with-insider-trading/?utm_term=.bc7f7b1e9fca
Steve Troughton-Smith’s Marzipan tool: https://github.com/steventroughtonsmith/marzipanify
Our thanks to Oregon State University E-campus. Want to take the fast track to your career in technology? Earn your computer science degree online from Oregon State University E-campus and tap into unlimited career possibilities in any field. Learn more at ecampus.oregonstate.edu/rebound.
And our thanks to Indochino (https://www.Indochino.com) where you’ll find the best made to measure shirts and suits at a great price. Use the promo code “REBOUND” and get any premium suit for just $359.
Our thanks also to Legacybox (http://legacybox.com/rebound) the world’s largest, most trusted, digitizer of home movies and photos. There’s never been a better time to digitally preserve your old home movies, film reels, and photos. Go to Legacybox.com/REBOUND to get 40% off your first order!


By Jason Snell for Macworld

Apple’s management of its video service isn’t a plot twist, it’s business as usual

This week the New York Post published a report that fits into every narrative about Apple’s forthcoming video-streaming service: that Apple, a skittish tech company that’s not used to having its fate determined by content produced by outsiders, has been heavy-handed in providing feedback to the people creating TV series for Apple’s new service.

I believe there’s got to be some truth in there, but this is a more complicated story than perhaps the Post is interested in telling. (Shocker.)

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Jason Snell for Tom's Guide

How the iPhone relates to the big releases at MWC 2019

Just as the spirit of Antoni Gaudí pervades Barcelona, Apple is everywhere at Mobile World Congress—and nowhere at all. Apple doesn’t go to industry trade shows, but it’s always present, as a bar for other companies to compare themselves to and differentiate themselves from. Apple won’t say that it does the same (even though I suspect Apple sends employees to Mobile World Congress every year just to look around), but that’s okay—we can do that job for them. So here’s a collection of observations about how Apple relates to the announcements we’ve seen in the last week, both from Barcelona and from Samsung’s Unpacked event in San Francisco.

Continue reading on Tom's Guide ↦


By Jason Snell

Bad AppleScript: Use Hazel to auto-compress Logic projects

My office file server still has a lot of free space, but one of these days I’m going to fill it to the brim with old podcast project files. So I’ve been considering what to do to reduce the amount of archival data I’m storing. A while back, Marco Arment told me about his method of dealing with old project files—a shell script that uses the flac command-line utility to losslessly compress the giant uncompressed audio files that take up the bulk of space in any podcast project. The result is almost a 50 percent space savings!

In practical terms, after a few weeks (or in the case of a couple of podcasts I do, a year) I am not likely to need to go back to my original source files again. (And if I do, I’ve got a shell script to decompress all the archived files.) What I wanted to do was create an automated system in which projects would automatically get compressed after a waiting period. Since I store all my files on a Mac mini, I decided to use Noodlesoft’s Hazel to watch my folders and perform the automation using AppleScript.

This ended up being a multi-stage process. First, I needed to set up a Hazel rule that would look at a folder’s age and judge if it’s ready to be archived. This required me to extend Hazel’s functionality via a small script that would check to see if a folder actually contained any Logic projects—and would leave it alone if it didn’t.


This rule set only finds folders modified in the past three months that are not from this year—a weird restriction, but at the end of the calendar year I do an end-of-the-year clip show on The Incomparable, and so I don’t want to bother compressing old projects that are eligible for inclusion in that show. (This way, my Mac mini will have something to do on January 1 every year—namely compressing nine months worth of projects.)

The last item, though, is the tricky addition I needed to make—it runs an embedded AppleScript that looks inside the folder to ensure there’s at least one Logic project inside. That script looks like this:

Continue reading “Bad AppleScript: Use Hazel to auto-compress Logic projects”…


March 1, 2019

Breaking and fixing things, featuring a holographic Leonardo da Vinci!


Star Wars as an infographic

A really clever and gorgeous retelling of the original Star Wars as a scrollable infographic. You’re going to be scrolling for a while. Apparently an Empire Strikes Back one is in the works as well.

(hat tip: Troy Boulware via Twitter)


By Dan Moren for Macworld

How repairing an old Mac mini made me anticipate a new Mac Pro

I spent the better part of this week with my 2012 Mac mini in pieces in my living room, as I attempted to fix an issue with a dead drive. The problem that sparked it is still plaguing me, but the experience has given me both some appreciation for the way Apple used to do things, as well as the way it might once again.

This isn’t the first time I’ve taken apart a Mac–it’s not even the first time I’ve taken apart this particular Mac mini. Diving into hardware has always been a task that I enjoy. It’s fun not only to see how everything fits together (especially with Apple’s famously small tolerances) but also to realize that this amazing box, which can do all these cool things, is a clever combination of so many parts working in concert.

This particular Mac mini has the benefit of being a model that’s both reasonably easy to disassemble (assuming you have the right tools) and actually fairly upgradeable. Not all Macs, past or present, have quite that level of flexibility and lately the company’s products have seemed to trend towards the other end of the spectrum.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Dan Moren

The Back Page: I Fold (Phones)

So you saw the presentation on the Samsung Galaxy Fold and then you watched Huawei unveil the Mate X, and suddenly you all want to know when we here at Apple are going to make folding phones.

Folding. Phones.

Really? That’s what you want? I have to ask: What the hell is wrong with you people? We released a foldable phone five years ago, it was called the iPhone 6, and everybody screamed bloody murder.

Look, I’m sick and tired of people complaining that Apple is “falling behind” on every new “innovation” that other tech companies are trying to make happen. We didn’t miss smartwatches, we didn’t miss intelligent speakers, and we sure as hell didn’t miss smartphones. Okay, we may have missed intelligent speakers a little bit.

But not every single little thing that other companies trot out is worth spending our time and money on. We’re here to make the hard choices for you, because god knows you’re too distracted by shiny newness to do so. Did we really miss out on head-mounted displays? You wanted one of those creepy Google Glasses to wear everywhere? Because we could have done it, but we didn’t, because nobody wants to have to stare at people wearing cameras on their faces and staring at screens because they’re more interested than the latest YouTube video then your conversation about your kids. You’re welcome.

At Apple, we don’t just blindly follow the latest whims or so-called “trends.” If we had a nickel for every time some analyst said that we were doomed to failure because we had “missed out” on some product category, we would have amassed approximately $235 million, which we would then have donated entirely to charity because we already have so much more money than that it’s ridiculous.

What’re you going to say we missed next? I have to ask. Should we be building electric scooters? Boxing up meal delivery kits? Making our own video-streaming service? … Okay, that last one’s not half bad. Anyway, my point is, we don’t just do what everybody else is doing. If all your friends launched themselves into space, would you follow them? No, seriously, I’m asking, because there are a lot of billionaires building rockets.

So, no, the existence of foldable phones doesn’t mean we’re automatically going to start making them, no matter what patent filings you’ve uncovered. (Look, we let Fred patent a lot of stuff. It makes him feel useful. Keep it up, Fred.) Foldable phones goes way down on the list, below all the other stupid things people have demanded we make, like toaster-fridge laptops with touchscreens and smart fabrics with nano-materials and a FireWire-based audio breakout box. We’ve almost cracked that last one.

Basically we’re very busy, and you can either have a foldable phone or an electric miracle car. Or laptop keyboards that work. One of those. You pick.

Hey, building smartphones is hard and making them foldable isn’t even in the top ten things that we’re interested in. Because we’re not making tacos, we’re making phones, and as everybody made abundantly clear in 2014, phones aren’t supposed to bend. You want a folding phone, go find yourself a Motorola StarTAC. Enjoy surfing the web on that. We’ll be right here, not folding our phones.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By Dan Moren

Applications Folder: The Unarchiver

Unarchiver

File compression! It’s not sexy, it’s not new, but it’s still something we all deal with, even in this day and age of superfast Internet connections and terabytes of storage. But I still remember all too well the heady days of the ‘90s, when downloading anything off a bulletin board or the nascent Internet meant relying on that old chestnut, StuffIt Expander, and working with .SIT files, binhexing, and so on.

These days, of course, file compression is built right into macOS, with the ability to zip and unzip files directly accessible via the Finder. And for most people, that’s probably enough.

But every once in a while, I run across something for which macOS’s built-in compression capabilities aren’t quite sufficient. In those eventualities, I have for years turned to The Unarchiver. In addition to handling your standard ZIP files, The Unarchiver can accommodate a ton of other compression and archiving formats, like RAR, gzip, tar, and even those old StuffIt files you might have lying around.

I don’t find myself using The Unarchiver that much, but when I do, it’s critical. Recently I was downloading a compressed virtual machine for a project, and the instructions were adamant that the file could not be decompressed with macOS’s standard tools, since it would end up extracting the VM in the wrong format. (Sure enough, the first time I downloaded it, I missed this fact, and ended up with something my VM software couldn’t read. Which meant downloading the multi-gig file all over again.) The Unarchiver, though, dealt with it with aplomb.

In fact, I’ve never run into a file format that The Unarchiver can’t handle. It’s not a piece of software that has much in the way of user interface. Its preferences let you choose which archiving formats it’s the default system handler for, as well as how to treat the resulting files and the original archives. But frankly, that’s all The Unarchiver really needs to do. It’s the kind of tool that doesn’t get in your way, just does its job quietly and unremarkably. And, best of all, it’s free.

So really, there’s no reason not to install The Unarchiver. You might never need it, but if you do, you’ll be glad you have it.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By Jason Snell

We Like: Fixing things!

I hear so much these days about how we live in a disposable society, and to a certain extent that’s true. Many of our devices aren’t designed to be repaired by the owners, whether it’s a smartphone or a car. And yet some devices still are repairable… and in the last few years I’ve come to love the combination of repairable products and the Internet.

A year or so ago my washing machine stopped draining and flooded a portion of my garage, which is where I work! It was not good. Fortunately the flood didn’t get too far, and we sopped it up with towels and ran fans, but we were left with the problem of a washing machine that didn’t work. (We ended up spending a few weeks clothes to the local laundromat, washing them there, then carting them home sopping wet to dry them in our still-functional dryer.)

We called local appliance repair people, all of whom heard the brand name of our washing machine and refused to perform service. More distant repair people in our region, including one that had previously serviced this machine, also refused. One said they could fit us in if we would wait about six weeks.

We got so frustrated that we decided we were just going to give up and buy a new washing machine—one that we could get reliably serviced by a local repair person. And that moment took me off the hook. Now I knew that if I broke our existing machine by attempting to fix it myself, it was no big deal—we were replacing it anyway. So why not try?

Like our disposable society, there are lots of things that are bad about the Internet. But you know what’s not bad about the Internet? You can search for just about any repairable device in your home and find multiple YouTube videos that show you, in detail, how to repair them. When I diagnosed that my washing machine had a failed pump motor, I was able to search for a replacement part—the Internet’s also full of sites that will ship you parts—and using YouTube guidance, open up my washing machine and replace the pump. It took maybe an hour. It cost me my time and 20 or 30 bucks for the replacement pump. And just like that, our washing machine was functional again.

I’ve repeated this same approach with replacing a car stereo, fixing a broken rack in my dishwasher, replacing a broken drawer in our refrigerator, and replacing a snapped-off handle and an ancient cutting blade on my lawnmower. (We bought the lawnmower 20 years ago and it’s still chugging away.)

The other week my weather station, which I’ve written about here and has been in service in my backyard for 15 years, stopped reporting rainfall totals. I sighed and started pricing new weather stations, until I realized that I could buy a replacement rain sensor, take the thing apart, and put it back together. I did that two days ago, for about one-tenth the cost of replacing the entire weather station.

So what do I like? I like the Internet providing me with replacement parts and instructional repair videos, yes. But I also like the feeling I get in knowing that when something breaks, I don’t need to throw myself on the mercy of a local appliance repair shop and write them a large check. I can, in my instances, fix it myself. Before the Internet the entire idea would’ve been ludicrous, but now it’s routine.



Search Six Colors