Six Colors
Six Colors

This Week's Sponsor

ListenLater.net: Turn Articles Into Podcasts. Email us a link and our AI will deliver human-like narration directly to your podcast app.

By Jason Snell

Generation gap: Using Shortcuts with Folder Actions

Nothing like mixing a Mac feature from 2002 with one from 2021.

In my quest to improve my Apple analyst-call transcripts by using OpenAI’s Whisper technology, I’ve ended up in a position where I need to create an automation on my Mac that runs when an item is placed in a folder. In doing so, it turns out that I unearthed several layers of Apple automation sediment—and discovered a place where the company could get a quick win by declaring an ancient feature to be new and improved.

Chain of events

Here’s what led me here: I capture Apple’s quarterly analyst call with Audio Hijack and thought I could use its automation features to kick off the transcription of a segment of the call every few minutes.

It didn’t work. While Audio Hijack lets you run Shortcuts and shell commands from its scripting interface, those methods block the main thread of Audio Hijack, locking up the interface. Not acceptable, given how long it takes for Whisper to run.

As a result, I needed to find a way to automatically process a new recording without using Audio Hijack’s scripting interface to do it. It was clear what was required: I would tell Audio Hijack to move the finished recording to a different folder, and then run a script the moment the file was added to that folder.

I needed a utility that could watch a folder and then process any item that was added. And I had some choices.

Option one: Use Hazel

I use Noodlesoft’s $42 Hazel for various clean-up jobs on my Mac. Hazel watches folders on your Mac and then acts on the files inside.

I could’ve used Hazel to do this job, but I decided not to for a few reasons. I’ve found that connecting scripting into Hazel actions can be complicated and brittle. It can be done, but sometimes my actions break and I have to fix them, and I don’t really want to do that during my transcriptions if I can help it. Its Shortcuts support also seems suspect… I have tried to use it with little success.

But also, why use a third-party utility when there’s an equivalent feature built into the operating system itself? Because while many people will have forgotten, or perhaps never known, macOS has had this built-in functionality for ages.

Folder Actions via AppleScript

Folder Actions were a feature of Mac OS 9, and they were introduced back into Mac OS X with version 10.2 “Jaguar” in 2002. And more than twenty years later, they’re still there. Folder Actions used to be accessible by control-clicking on any folder in the Finder, but that easy access was ripped out years ago. In today’s macOS (and yes, it works on macOS Sonoma), you need to open the Folder Actions Setup utility, which is located in the /System/Library/CoreServices/Applications/ folder.

Folder Actions is pretty clever—you can run scripts when items are added or removed from a folder, when the folder is opened or closed, or when the window of that folder is moved in Finder.

Unfortunately, this is a feature that is wired directly into AppleScript. So in order to use a version of my existing shortcut with Folder Actions, I needed to write a three-line AppleScript script:

on adding folder items to this_folder after receiving added_items
    tell application "Shortcuts Events" to run the shortcut named "Apple Result Transcriptor" with input added_items
end adding folder items to

Pretty dumb — for those keeping score we’ve now gone from Audio Hijack to AppleScript to Shortcuts in order to get what we want. (I could’ve rewritten my Shortcut in AppleScript, but… I don’t want to do that!) And yet also pretty brilliant, because I’m using a 21-year-old OS feature to run a Shortcut, an automation system that didn’t appear on the Mac until 2021.

Don’t forget Automator

Automator also has Folder Actions.

I should mention that there is an additional built-in way to act on items added to a folder in macOS: Automator. Automator, introduced to Mac OS X three years after Folder Actions, uses a different pathway to the same result.

When you create a new Automator action, you’re asked to choose a type for your document. Among the types is Folder Action, which runs when files and folders are added to a specific folder. I could’ve used this method, but I would again have ended up using a shell command or an AppleScript to run my existing Shortcut.

A new feature that already exists

On iOS and iPadOS, you can set various triggers to run Shortcuts automatically. It’s clever and useful. I have a Shortcut that turns on Do Not Disturb when my iPhone connects to the Bluetooth speaker in my shower—and turns it off again when it disconnects. But Shortcuts contains no such automation functionality on the Mac.

That’s pretty dumb. It’s really useful to be able to run automations when certain events happen, such as—just for one example—when files are added to a folder. Given that Folder Actions are old enough to drink, perhaps the underlying tech might not be the most modern and efficient way to implement such a feature. Maybe there’s a modern, better way.

What I’m saying, though, is that the Shortcuts team should lift the entire concept of Folder Actions (from both AppleScript and Automator) and implement (or re-implement) it for Shortcuts. Along with all the other automation triggers that iPhone and iPad have that, for some reason, just aren’t available on the Mac.

Sure, I can solve these problems on the Mac via other means, but I shouldn’t have to. macOS should provide this functionality itself.


By John Moltz

This Week in Apple: An onmouseover Event

John Moltz and his conspiracy board. Art by Shafer Brown.

Apple scores a victory against Epic. Does it want to celebrate by going to Disneyland? And buying it? Also, keep this under your hat, but Apple is rumored to be shipping new phones next month. Huge, if true.

The App Store doth protest too much

It’s hard to believe that Apple’s conflict with Epic has now been going on for 35 years, but here we are.

I’m sorry, I’m being informed that it just feels like 35 years. I regret the error.

This week Apple won a battle, but not the war.

“Apple Doesn’t Have to Change App Store Rules Yet, Rules Supreme Court in Ongoing Epic Dispute”

This pertains to Apple’s anti-steering rules, which prevent app developers from mentioning that websites exist in the year 2023. While the App Store has many objectionable rules, habits, inconsistencies, vagaries, and mysterious, unwritten spells bound to the ancient powers of mercurial spirit demons, the anti-steering rules are among the worst—even if it’s sometimes hard to pick a least favorite.…

This is a post limited to Six Colors members.



Disney alters the deal—pray they don’t alter it further. But is Disney suffering from franchise fatigue, and is aggressively bunding Hulu with Disney+ the solution? Also: Jason’s sad about Apple’s failed college football deal.


By Shelly Brisbin

In iOS 17, Siri can make the web speak

On a Safari page where Reader is available (right), tell Siri to “read this.” Within Accessibility settings (left, center), you can enable Speak Screen or Speak Selection, choose from a expanded number of voices, and adjust their speed and pitch.

Down deep in the iOS 17 public beta, there’s a new Safari feature, available through a quick Siri command. Say “read this” to have the voice assistant speak a Web article aloud to you, including this one. You can listen whenever looking isn’t an option—in the car, while puttering around the house, or even when your eyes are just a little tired of reading a screen. Speaking content aloud isn’t really new to iOS, and there are more customizable ways to have it done, but it’s never been so quick or easy to have webpages read to you.

In the beta, open a web page in Safari. If the Reader option is available for the page, you can say “read this” after activating Siri. You don’t need to open Reader view, just note whether it’s available. (If it isn’t, Siri won’t read the page.)

Once activated, a set of controls appear briefly onscreen, and a tone plays. Your device then begins speaking, starting at a volume considerably lower than where you have it set. After a few seconds, the controller and Siri button disappear, and speech kicks up in volume. While the controller’s onscreen, you can see how long the reading will take, and change where you want the spoken output to go. Once the controller disappears, you can still adjust settings via Control Center.

iOS reads in whatever voice you’ve chosen for Siri. That means you might want to reconsider whether the one that tells you the weather, or apologizes for not being able to do something just now, is the one you want to hear reading articles. Fortunately, the Siri voices have gotten a lot better in the last few years, and all of the ones I’ve tried sound pretty good doing longform reading, even if you can’t change their speed, or other parameters.

When I checked out “read this,” I found that iOS reads the headline, then jumps straight into the content. You won’t hear subheads, leading image captions or, as on pages for the radio show where I work, info about embedded audio players. In this way, “read this” mirrors Safari Reader’s behavior. And so long as you don’t navigate to something else in Safari, speech continues. You can even move to another app or the Home screen while you read. Or, if your return to a page you’ve been reading, and say “read this” again, iOS picks up where it left off, rather than starting over, which is a nice touch.

Advanced speech

As anyone who has used TextEdit or Safari on the Mac knows, speaking text aloud isn’t the new part here. It’s been possible to do that for years. In iOS, you can even set a Shortcut to do it. Having Siri kick off the process automatically, without the need to select what you want to hear—that’s the new stuff. It’s pretty great, even though it isn’t even close to all that your phone can do, when it comes to speech.

Most of iOS’s fancy speech options are behind the Accessibility item in Settings, where they assist users who use speech on the daily. And they’re not news. Besides a much larger choice of voices, you can change their pitch and reading speed, and apply speech to an entire article, or to selected text, if you like. You can also stop and start reading more easily, and surf around the Web while a page you’re reading continues. Finally, you can have content in apps other than Safari spoken.

To do all of this, you’ll need to use the Speak Screen feature within Accessibility settings, or perhaps the more basic Speak Selection. Unlike the VoiceOver screen reader, these accessibility options don’t force you into an unfamiliar set of gestures.

[Shelly Brisbin is a radio producer, host of the Parallel podcast, and author of the book iOS Access for All. She's the host of Lions, Towers & Shields, a podcast about classic movies, on The Incomparable network.]


By Dan Moren for Macworld

The USB-C iPhone won’t clean up Apple’s Lightning mess

It’s time for everyone’s favorite development in the world of Apple tech: a port change. Yep, that’s right. After what will have been about 11 years, the iPhone is once again changing its charging port, this time from Lightning to the increasingly ubiquitous USB-C. (For comparison sake, the previous 30-pin dock connector, lasted just nine years, from the third-generation iPod to the iPhone 5.)

We all know the benefits that the USB-C transition will bring: interoperability, less cable waste, and improvements in speed. But it’ll also cause some pain for those who have scads of Lightning cables lying around that will be, if not useless, then at superfluous.

However, even with the big change that is the iPhone’s charging port, Lightning won’t be excised from across Apple’s line-up. There are several other products that will still need to make the transition before there can truly be one port to rule them all. Here’s a rundown of what’s still using Lightning and when they might embrace the USB-C future.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦



Apple’s new music discovery station, how we take notes when problem solving, our use of voice assistants, and whether Apple’s support is as good as it used to be.


by Jason Snell

We weren’t prepared for the Galactic Starcruiser

Speaking of Disney, Zombies, Run! developer Adrian Hon went to the immersive Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser hotel/roleplaying game in advance of it closing next month and wrote a detailed description of the experience.

Hon’s ultimate point, which he made on Mastodon, is that “The Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser hotel is the future of entertainment, but we weren’t prepared for it.” Or as his (very long!) post concludes:

It’s crystal clear to me the instant the Starcruiser closes, it’ll be lamented as a daring experiment that was tragically misunderstood. “Why doesn’t Disney do this any more?” people will wail. It doesn’t deserve its reputation – yet that reputation is partly of its own making. I hope this account explains what worked for me, what didn’t, and how Disney might do better next time.

And I’m sure there will be a next time.

A whole confluence of decisions and events doomed the Galactic Starcruiser, but I’m with Hon, who likens the entire thing to a video game or an escape room you’re in for two days: This sort of immersive experience is absolutely going to be a thing in the future, especially as generations raised on video games gain ever more disposable income. The Galactic Starcruiser, which is largely treated as the point-and-laugh folly of a hubristic Disney corporation, will probably end up being seen as a trailblazer.

—Linked by Jason Snell

by Jason Snell

Could Apple really buy Disney?

Kim Masters and Alex Weprin, writing in The Hollywood Reporter:

A few weeks before Bob Iger sat down for that CNBC interview in which he said Disney’s linear TV networks, like ABC and FX, “may not be core” to the company’s business, a veteran Hollywood executive mused to The Hollywood Reporter on the possibility of a deal that would rock the industry: Apple buying Disney. It’s an idea that keeps being discussed, even though many top executives have scoffed at it and many still do. Apple doesn’t want to buy a studio, they say, and there’s no way the feds would allow a huge deal like that to go through.

The “Apple buys Disney” concept has been floating around for years, but it has never seemed more likely than it does right now. This is not to say that it seems especially likely, but given Disney’s current business issues and the return of former Apple board member Bob Iger to the CEO job there… it doesn’t seem as outlandish an idea as it once did.

As the story by Masters and Weprin details, there are plenty of places where Disney does not fit with Apple. But if Iger is willing to sell off its TV networks and stations and streamline the company, it’s entirely possible that he’s actually prepping it for sale.

The business of a tech giant like Apple is so much larger than that of an entertainment company like Disney that Apple could easily view it as a complimentary piece that would augment the growth of its Services business. And Apple would acquire an enormous intellectual-property library.

As for regulatory concerns, I just don’t see them. Apple’s overlap with Disney is relatively minor. The Microsoft acquisition of Activision is a similar case of a tech giant buying a company whose strength is in content, and it’s going to happen.

Apple buying Disney would certainly be… unexpected. But after many years of shaking my head at the idea, I’m hesitant to do so now. While Apple has been slowly creeping toward being a company that’s as much about digital services as hardware and software, a move like this would be instantly transformational.

It may simply be the fact that the tech industry is about to eat the entertainment industry whole. If that’s the case, Apple may not find a better match than its old friends at Disney.

—Linked by Jason Snell

by Jason Snell

Callsheet provides a clean alternative to IMDB

What do a classic Charles Laughton film and ‘WKRP in Cincinnati’ have in common?

I would be remiss in my duties if I didn’t mention that my pal Casey Liss has launched his new app, Callsheet.

Callsheet fills the same niche as tools like IMDB, namely to solve the hey-it’s-that-guy problem when you see someone on TV or in a movie and wonder where you’ve seen them before. These days using the IMDB website and app can be an exercise in frustration, so Casey has built a streamlined, straightforward app based on The Movie Database, a competitor to IMDB.

And instead of junking his app up with ads, Casey has chosen to make Callsheet a subscription app. After a very reasonable number of free searches, you’ll be prompted to pay (an also very reasonable) $1 per month or $9 per year. I know Casey has really sweated over the business model for this app, and the result is carefully considered solution that really lets you use the app before deciding if it’s worth paying for.

More sample pages from Callsheet, inspired by The Flop House.

I especially appreciated Callsheet’s integration with other services. It links out to IMDB itself for trivia, and—my favorite—it uses JustWatch to provide instant information about where a movie or TV show is available to stream. He’s even got a “hide spoilers” feature to prevent you from finding out that Idris Elba isn’t actually in the last two seasons of that show of his.1

While The Movie Database isn’t quite as detailed as IMDB, it seems pretty close to me. And thanks to its generous API terms, Casey’s been able to build a superior viewing companion. It’s worth giving Callsheet a whirl to see if it’s right for you. I already know it’s right for me!


  1. If you know, you know. 
—Linked by Jason Snell

macOS utility NightOwl now contains shady botnet code

A few years back, I recommended an app called NightOwl, which allows you to toggle your Mac between dark and light mode on a schedule. While I used it for a while, it eventually got supplanted by built-in macOS features.

I’m guessing I wasn’t the only one who abandoned it. At some point the app was sold by its developers to another company, and according to some investigation by web developer Taylor Robinson, that firm injected some sketchy code1 that basically turns your Mac into an internet gateway for the company’s use:

[The app] forcibly joins your devices into a botnet for use of market research, without your knowledge (other than the TOS in small text on the download page) or express consent (this feature cannot be turned off, even when the app is quit).

As Robinson points out, this is documented in the terms of service, but I don’t think the average user is likely to notice it. Moreover, the means by which it is doing this is not only deeply shady, but also introduces a potential security risk. Robinson has put together thorough information about how to fully remove the app.

I hadn’t run NightOwl for some time, but it was still installed on my Mac mini, though it had clearly not been updated to the newer version as none of the files mentioned in the post were present. But if you are still using this app on the regular, it’s probably best to uninstall it. I’ll be updating my original post with a link to this story.

[Thanks to reader Arturo for sending this in.]


  1. Even shadier is Robinson’s point that the app makes use of several open source software packages without including the appropriate licenses, a big no-no. 
—Linked by Dan Moren

by Jason Snell

Apple’s college football TV deal, and a century-old athletic conference, fall apart

After recent reports that Apple was close to striking its first TV deal for American College Football, the whole deal collapsed like a house of cards last week.

According to numerous reports like this one from The Athletic, Apple offered the nine remaining members of the Pac-12 conference “a five-year deal with an annual base rate of $23 million per school… with incentives based on projected subscribers to a Pac-12 streaming product akin to Apple’s MLS League Pass.” The report continued:

At 1.7 million subscribers, the per-school payout would match the $31.7 million average that Big 12 schools will reportedly receive from ESPN and Fox beginning in 2025. But Kliavkoff encouraged the room to think much bigger — at 5 million subscribers, the schools would eclipse $50 million per year, closer to the deep-pocketed SEC and Big Ten than the ACC or Big 12.

This seems to be Apple’s approach to sports rights. Unlike traditional players, who generally just write checks and receive the rights in return, Apple approaches rights negotiations as opportunities to mix direct payments combined with a share of revenue driven by a paid subscription product. Apple certainly could have afforded to offer the Pac-12 nothing but cash, but it instead preferred to offer less money—still roughly $1.1 billion total over five years!—along with a percentage of the upside.

The story is complicated, with numerous reports that the Apple offer was meant to sit alongside a more traditional rights offer—but apparently that other offer fell through due to the recent tough times in the TV industry, and so the Pac-12 conference executive committee was given Apple’s offer alone. With one school (Colorado) having defected from the conference earlier in July, the pressure was up to execute the deal. According to the Athletic’s report, Apple sweetened the deal by another $2 million per school per year, and that was enough to get the three schools that were wary (Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah) to commit to the plan.

As reported by John Canzano, here’s what Arizona State University president Michael Crow had to say about the Apple offer:

We were offered a media contract by the Apple corporation, which was a technological 23rd century Star Trek-thing with really unbelievable capability that we were very interested in. We thought there was some risk but huge opportunity.

What happened next was a bit surprising. According to John Ourand at Sports Business Journal, Oregon and Washington decided to contact the Big 10 to see if it could make a better offer. Thus prodded, the conference and its media partner, Fox, made them an offer—one the conference had previously insisted it wasn’t interested in making.

The money and opportunity to be in a larger conference with better long-term prospects was just too much for Oregon and Washington to ignore, at which point the entire deal collapsed and the century-old Pac-12 was left with only four members: Cal, Stanford, Washington State, and Oregon State.

And so that’s where we are now. The Pac-12 is now four schools attempting to expand to get back up to a reasonable number. Would Apple make a deal with a re-formed Pac-12? Possibly—it’s basically the only access the company would have to college football—but it will definitely not be offering $25 million per school for the privilege.

As someone who has been a lifelong fan of a team in the Pac-10 (and later Pac-12) conference, seeing the historic bonds between all these west coast colleges destroyed like this is heartbreaking. Games will still be played on Saturdays all over the country, but things will never, ever be the same.

—Linked by Jason Snell

Jason has the painful details about Apple’s comeback bid for college football TV rights that fell just short of the goal line. We also discuss what Apple’s rich-but-middling quarterly results say about the importance of this fall’s iPhone launch.


By John Moltz

This Week in Apple: Only competing against yourself

John Moltz and his conspiracy board. Art by Shafer Brown.

The rumor mill giveth again, as more updated devices are on the horizon—some in zeitgeisty colors. Apple’s down quarter, meanwhile, won’t stop the company from being the best dang technology company it can be.

AirTags Pro

It’s been weeks since Apple announced new devices so you’re probably getting as itchy as I am for new stuff. Or maybe it’s because I switched brands of talcum powder. If it’s the former, though, let us never fear: this is why the Apple rumor mill was invented.

All hail the Apple rumor mill and its infallible nature, amen.

Apple supply chain diviner Ming-Chi Kuo says Apple could begin making updated AirTags in late 2024.

New AirTags? Oh, great. They’re so small, how am I supposed to find the ones I already have to upgrade them?!

If only there were some sort of app for that.

There doesn’t seem to be any rush to upgrade, however, as the primary feature of the new little doohickeys noted by Kuo is better integration with the Vision Pro.…

This is a post limited to Six Colors members.


Apple’s shaky quarter hides big profits and expense cuts

Apple’s business has done so well for so long that it’s been a little unusual to watch the company produce financial results that aren’t setting all-time records. But the huge jump in growth Apple made in 2022 has proved to be a bar too high for the company to leap over in 2023, and so Thursday’s report of third-quarter fiscal results were once again down—but down with a huge asterisk. When you make nearly $20 billion in profit in three months, how down can your quarter really be?

Continue reading on Macworld ↦



Search Six Colors