Six Colors
Six Colors

Apple, technology, and other stuff

This Week's Sponsor

Magic Lasso Adblock: Block ads in iPhone, iPad, Mac and Apple TV apps

The future of CNN+ is called into question, the Oscars recognize streaming services of all kinds, and did Peacock finally get the Olympics right?


Apple will let iPhones accept contactless payments later this year

Apple Newsroom:

The new capability will empower millions of merchants across the US, from small businesses to large retailers, to use their iPhone to seamlessly and securely accept Apple Pay, contactless credit and debit cards, and other digital wallets through a simple tap to their iPhone — no additional hardware or payment terminal needed.

This feature has been much rumored in the last couple weeks, though I’m surprised to see Apple announce it in a press release—maybe this is about getting ahead of the people who dig into software releases to find unannounced features.

What struck me as interesting is that Apple seems to specifically be targeting merchants using third-party apps for this feature:

Tap to Pay on iPhone will be available for payment platforms and app developers to integrate into their iOS apps and offer as a payment option to their business customers. Stripe will be the first payment platform to offer Tap to Pay on iPhone to their business customers, including the Shopify Point of Sale app this spring. Additional payment platforms and apps will follow later this year.

This suggests that it’s more about a software framework available to developers than a feature built into the OS—i.e. allowing developers to create apps that accept payments using the built-in NFC chip.

A couple notable omissions: there’s no mention in here of Apple Cash (née Apple Pay Cash), so you may not be using this feature to, say, pay your friend back for those movie tickets1. One possible reason: Apple Cash remains unavailable to customers outside the U.S.

Also absent is any mention of the iPad, with good reason: current iPads don’t have NFC chips built-in.2 Though with an iPad Air refresh Reportedly waiting in the wings, it’s entirely possible that Apple’s waiting to roll out that feature alongside a hardware announcement in March. Hard not to imagine that Apple would like the ability for an iPad to act as a point of sale terminal right out of the box.

That last raises question about the future of third parties like Toast and Square, both of which offer their own hardware add-ons to turn iPads into POS terminals. But given Apple’s note of “additional payment platforms and apps” coming later this year, those companies would probably build support for iPhones and future iPads offering this feature—and, as the replacement time on iPads can often be several years, their hardware products will probably still have relevance for some years to come.

Moreover, there are two strategic considerations to take into account here: first, this is probably good for Apple’s Services revenue, as it means more places that will potentially accept Apple Pay.

And second, this move may be about avoiding regulation. In 2020, the European Commission launched an antitrust investigation into Apple’s limitation of access to NFC payments, though the primary concern in that case was that only Apple Pay had the ability to make payments. As far as Apple’s press release suggests today, this is purely about the ability to accept payments. It’ll be interesting to see if that moves the needle for the EC at all, but something tells me it’ll probably still have objections.


  1. Ha ha, just kidding, who goes to the movies anymore? 
  2. A couple models like the iPad Air 2 and mini 3 did have an NFC chip built-in, but they were never available via software. 

It’s time for our annual dive into the Six Colors Apple Report Card, as Jason and Myke interpret the scores and comments of several dozen Apple-watchers and add their own views on where the company is succeeding—and where it’s not. Also discussed: future M2 Macs and the intricacies of Dutch dating.


By Jason Snell

Apple in 2021: The Six Colors report card

Note: This story has not been updated since 2022.

Tim Cook at WWDC 2021

It’s time for our annual look back on Apple’s performance during the past year, as seen through the eyes of writers, editors, developers, podcasters, and other people who spend an awful lot of time thinking about Apple.

This is the seventh year that I’ve presented this survey to a hand-selected group. They were prompted with 12 different Apple-related subjects, and asked to rate them on a scale from 1 to 5 and optionally provide text commentary per category. I received 53 replies, with the average results as shown below:

Final average scores.

Since I used largely the same survey as in previous years, I was able to track the change in my panel’s consensus opinion on all but one question compared to previous years. The net changes between 2020 and 2021 surveys is displayed below:

Final score changes.

Read on for category-by-category grades, trends, and commentary from the panelists.

Continue reading “Apple in 2021: The Six Colors report card”…


By Dan Moren for Macworld

How iOS 15.4 could finally eliminate password hell

Security has been a significant selling point in Apple’s modern era. The company’s invested a lot in building it into its platforms from the ground up, with innovations like the Secure Enclave, all the way up to user-facing technology like Touch ID, Face ID, and iCloud Keychain.

But in the most recent beta releases of its operating systems—particularly in iOS 15.4—Apple’s rolled out some new improvements that take not only security but also convenience into account. And they demonstrate that, while the company is continuing to take the safety of our devices and information to heart, it also realizes that these are systems that people have to interact with, often many times a day.

Moreover, if you’re peering into the future, you can also see pretty clearly that Apple has further expansions of these technologies in mind, with the aim of continuing to make its products the most secure—and most user-friendly—options on the market.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


February 4, 2022

A podcast about dating in the Netherlands.



By Joe Rosensteel

When Apple TV’s ‘Universal Search’ is a black hole

I have to search for a lot of movies to watch on my Apple TV because I have a movie podcast. If a movie is located within a service that I’m already paying for, then I’d like to get that. I don’t want to browse all of the services, and I don’t use websites that claim to have a complete catalog of where movies are available because that’s not always true, and they also can’t take into account movies that I have already paid for in my library.

It’s not an easy problem to solve, but Apple at least seemed interested in solving it when they introduced Universal Search for Apple TV. Unfortunately, Apple doesn’t seem so interested in this problem anymore—and Universal Search has become increasingly useless and frustrating.

Play me a movie, please?

Recently, I asked Siri to display “Fight Club,” and was presented with a button to start watching it right away in Prime Video. So easy!

Unfortunately, when it started playing, it was a very compressed, blocky stream, and I could immediately tell something was amiss. I pressed the back button and discovered that what I had clicked on was actually “Popular Movies and TV — Free with ads” within Prime Video. In other words, Amazon had embedded its ad-supported IMDb TV service inside of Prime Video, with very little to differentiate the two very different presentations.

Let’s try another example: David Lynch’s 1984 “Dune.” Universal Search said I could watch it on Hulu, but it’s not really available on Hulu.

Because of Apple’s infamous App Store rules, Hulu can’t actually tell me what I’m missing. Searching within the Hulu app on my iPhone will show “Dune,” which is why it’s being indexed for universal search… but tapping on it for more info only generates this error message: “Sorry, but your subscription doesn’t include that movie. You can manage your subscription from your account page.”

Next to Hulu in my “Dune” search results is the button to get the Starz app—allowing me to deduce that perhaps I need to add Starz to Hulu for an extra $9/month, or subscribe to Starz through Apple for $9/month. But what’s the point in Universal Search if it leaves room for this ambiguity?

This happens again and again. Services like Prime Video and Hulu include an array of films and TV shows in their search indexes, when they’re not really available on those services… but on extensions to those services that might offer degraded quality or an upsell to a product I’m not buying.

What a mess! But it turns out that Apple does provide third party developers with the ability to tag a tier identifier to the indexed content that Universal Search, and Siri, ingest. It’s just that these developers aren’t doing it, and Apple doesn’t seem to care. Instead, it’s up to me—the guy paying these mega-companies money every month—to individually verify whether or not a movie is available.

Something’s very wrong with that system.

The bait and switch

Of course, even if a developer correctly labels their video tiers, it wouldn’t address issues such as mixing low-quality ad-supported streams with paid streams, meaning there’s no way to distinguish what kind of viewing experience one can expect until you click on a tile in Universal Search and start playback.

And it’s hard to imagine that this inaccurate data is really just there by mistake. It’s far more likely that this is an attempt to drive unsuspecting users into viewing their video ads, or inducing them to sign up for their add-on services (that can’t actually even be referenced on Apple’s platforms). Why not degrade the user experience a little bit in exchange for bumping up the quarterly numbers a little bit?

But in fairness, it’s also possible that some of these cases are simply caused by underfunded tech staffs at billion-dollar companies where money is spent wildly on the next big swords-and-sorcery streaming series but not on the developer who has to maintain an AppleTV app and interact with a huge back-end media database. That poor developer at Amazon who decided to cram IMDb TV listings into Prime Video might have only had the best of intentions. (But probably not.)

Beyond ads, there are the issues of variable quality. Is a film in 4K, HDR, HD, or standard def? Is the streaming service buttery smooth, or chunky Paramount+? Is the film edited, or presented in an alternate cut? If a film exists on several services, it’s incumbent on Apple’s interface to give us more information so that we can pick the version of the film we actually want to see.

It’s like a special, pay-for-access library… where some of the books are missing, others chopped up, random pages might be glued together, some have water damage, and on a bunch, the interior pages have been replaced with a pop-up diorama indicating that the regular version of the book is also available—but the pop-up book is sadly not allowed to tell you where it’s located.

The librarian shouldn’t shrug and say it’s up to the book publishers to put properly printed books and place them on the right shelves, and not print empty books with coupons to buy the real book in a nearby bookstore. It’s the job of the librarian to curate their collection and make sure that their books are readable and available, and to direct their patrons to right where they want to go.

I appreciate Apple’s desire to present users with simple choices. Simplicity is good. But in this case, it has led to a bizarre guessing game about what will happen if I pick one app over another. It calls into question the accuracy of Apple’s search results.

In other words, it all comes back to Apple. Universal Search is Apple’s product. It’s up to Apple to verify that their search results are the best results for their users—and right now, Apple is failing.

[Joe Rosensteel is a VFX artist and writer based in Los Angeles.]



How we manage notifications, our thoughts on Crisis Text Line’s data collection, our password management setup, and how we’re feeling about the Wordle acquisition by the New York Times.


By Jason Snell for Macworld

Apple’s headset: Another Apple Watch or HomePod?

This past weekend I sat around a table with three friends and spent an hour or so cracking jokes, shooting the breeze, and playing a little poker. I’m in the Bay Area, but they were in San Diego, North Carolina, and Canada. Yep-we played VR poker, which (I’ve been informed) means we were actually having a good time in the metaverse.

While Apple’s not rushing to embrace the term, reports indicate that the company has invested a lot of research-and-development money into launching a new product line that intersects with an “area of interest” that Apple CEO Tim Cook has talked about for several years now.

So here I am, fresh from the metaverse-well, playing poker on a Meta Quest 2 headset-to consider the potential arc of Apple’s next big product category. The company has been preparing for this moment for a long time, and this might be the year we finally see Apple’s first VR product. But will it be the next Apple Watch-or the next HomePod?

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


Mac workflows with Matthew Cassinelli

Dan and I joined Matthew Cassinelli earlier today to discuss and show off our Podcast Note shortcut and discuss Shortcuts and automation in general. It was a good time, so if you’d like to see this stuff in action, check it out!


Speaking of David Letterman, here’s a special episode of The Incomparable from May 2015, when Letterman retired from hosting a late-night talk show. This is not the usual panel discussion. It’s a (dare I say?) more NPR-podcast-like scripted and edited conversation with me and John Gruber, Andy Ihnatko, Tim Goodman, Philip Michaels, and Aaron Barnhart.


40 Years Later: The Letterman YouTube Channel

40 years ago, “Late Night With David Letterman” aired its first episode. While unofficial archivist Don Giller has filled his YouTube channel with old clips, as of today there’s an official Letterman YouTube Channel, and it’s launching with a shocking amount of archival video as well as some originals.

Oh, and Letterman’s also on “Late Night With Seth Meyers” tonight. As is only right.


Apple made a ton of money and released a ton of betas with new features. Face ID works with masks, Universal Control causes the soul of the Mac pointer to leave its body, the iPad relies on legacy nodes, the iPhone may take on Square, Dutch regulators are unsatisfied, and we tried to warn Spotify but it wouldn’t listen.


By Dan Moren for Macworld

Why Apple is happy to let the metaverse pass it by

It’s not often that we get to peek behind the aluminum and glass curtain around Apple Park, but besides occasions like the annual Worldwide Developers Conference and the handful of press events, we’re assured that four times a year CEO Tim Cook and CFO Luca Maestri will sit down to talk about the company’s most recent financial quarter and even field some questions from industry analysts.

And, if we’re lucky, there’s an opportunity to get a few breadcrumbs about what the Apple brass are thinking about. Sometimes, admittedly, it takes a little bit of reading between the lines—these people are extremely disciplined when it comes to secrets. But there are still tidbits to be gleaned from what’s coming down the pike, even if Tim Cook doesn’t want to show you the company’s roadmap.

Hearing Cook talk during last week’s call, I noted a few places where Apple’s chief executive seemed to have a particular interest—and looking at what Apple’s done or reportedly plans to do in those areas, it’s not hard to see why.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Dan Moren

The Back Page: Road Map to Perdition

Deep inside the gleaming white innards of Apple Park, protected by multiple factors of authentication and the most sophisticated technological security known to humanity, lies the most coveted of ancient artifacts. More powerful than the Ark of the Covenant, harder to locate than the Holy Grail, guarded more jealously than whatever the hell was on the back of the Declaration of Independence.

It is, yes, the Apple Road Map.

Yes, such an artifact actually exists! Tim Cook is no fool; he does not store Apple’s most vaunted possession merely as some PDF in iCloud, a file that can be copied and disseminated.

No, Tim Cook enshrines the Road Map upon the purest artisanal vellum, responsibly sourced from cows who have grazed only upon the fertile grass of Apple Park’s orchards, scraped clean by Apple interns who are surely regretting voicing any interest in “document security.”

While Cook is the only person with write permissions on the Road Map, a very select few may be permitted to enter the Sanctum Sanctorum buried deep beneath the center of Apple Park and gaze upon it.

And membership in the upper echelons of Apple’s executive team is no automatic guarantee that one will be bestowed read permissions on the holy document. First, one must prove their worthiness by passing three trials. Those who do not survive will not only be denied access, but will find themselves summarily dismissed from Apple’s ranks altogether. The path to the trials are littered with names of fallen comrades—Low, Browett, and Papermaster, just to name a few.

The trials are not for the faint of heart, as their Apple Watches will attest.

First, one must step into the Trial of the Void. Here, the candidate is placed within a featureless white room, bereft of doors or windows, and not allowed to leave for twenty-four hours. This trial has driven more than a few to the brink of madness, finding them a day later muttering about chamfered edges and aluminium. But those who have succeeded at the task are said to have emerged with the beatific smiles of the enlightened and surprisingly British accents.

With one success under their belt, candidates must then embark upon the second test: the Trial of the Dongle. Candidates will be presented with a random connector and a Rubbermaid bin full of dongles, and must figure out how to use the contents to connect the device to a modern Apple device. But be careful! Incorrect SCSI chain termination results in instant, well, termination.

Finally, they must confront the ultimate guardian of the Road Map and pass the Trial of the Cyberdog. Despite Steve Jobs’s claim that a bullet was put through Cyberdog’s head, this ferocious beast was instead put to work patrolling the lower levels of Apple’s Infinite Loop headquarters, and was later transplanted to Apple Park, lured with the last surviving population of Apple USB Mice. In order to pass the Cyberdog, one must offer up a sacrifice of a three-page OpenDoc file, along with all necessary RAM.

Once all three trials are passed, candidates are ushered into the vault where the Road Map is kept, but that is when the greatest secret is revealed—the Road Map’s arcane writing is unintelligible without the aid of special Apple augmented reality glasses, whose only prototype is the pair that rests on Tim’s face. The final, surprise test is then to best Cook himself, snatching the glasses from his face.

Only then will the Road Map be swiped to unlocked, the full glory shined upon the reader, and only the most faithful will survive its unfiltered gaze, for when you look upon the Road Map, the Road Map looks back upon you, wiping all memory of its existence from your mind so that the next time an analyst asks a question about the road map, you may reply with utter sincerity, “We’re not going to discuss that at this time.”

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]




Search Six Colors