Six Colors
Six Colors

Apple, technology, and other stuff

Become a Member!

Become a Six Colors member to read exclusive posts, get our weekly podcast and regular newsletters, and much more!

Building a new treadmill desk setup for 2025

Lex Friedman’s dual-desk setup, now (again) with treadmill.

I’m writing this article at 2.6 miles per hour.

Fifteen years ago(!), I wrote an article for Macworld about upgrading to a standing desk. Many studies warn of the negative health impacts of sitting all day long.

After about a year of standing, I upgraded to a treadmill desk (and of course, I wrote about that for Macworld, too.) I used that setup for years. I reviewed expensive, Bluetooth-enabled treadmill desks. And then eventually, I found I was on phone and video calls all day long, and it was increasingly difficult to tread for any significant amount of time. I switched back to merely standing. And then, eventually, the pull of gravity reduced me back to sitting.

But now I’m back, baby. I took 23,000 steps yesterday, and I’ll likely exceed that number today.

One step at a time

A year or so ago, a local friend of mine named Anthony posted on Instagram about having lost 20 or so pounds while working with a (remote) trainer. I commented to congratulate him. Minutes later, at most, that trainer slid into my direct messages: Did I have belly fat I wanted to shed, too? Let’s set up a call.

Whoa there, trainer man. You don’t know me. I ignored the message and kept living my life. But this past November, when Anthony shared that he was down 90 pounds, I felt inspired. I wrote to that same trainer, and started working with him. I’ve been making steady progress.

I’d been averaging roughly 5000 steps per day. I work from home. When my trainer mentioned that I could accelerate my weight loss if I got more steps, I knew I didn’t have more time to dedicate to workouts than I was already doing. I don’t feel like I have time to inject outdoor walks into my day right now. But I remembered my treadmill desks. In fact, I still had my treadmill desk in storage.

So I dug it out and turned it on. Like me, it hadn’t aged too gracefully. So I freecycled the old treadmill and bought a walking pad from Amazon.

Walking the walk

Wow, have the prices on treadmills for treadmill desk usage come down. I owned a $700 one; I reviewed $1000+ ones for Macworld back in the day. Today, you can find treadmills for under-desk usage for less than $250, with some costing barely more than $100.

What makes a treadmill good for desk use? Typically, it won’t have the standard hand railings (since those wouldn’t fit under your desk). It will prioritize a quiet motor. And the maximum speed will top out far slower than a traditional treadmill. Wirecutter has recommendations that didn’t speak to me. I ended up going with a highly-rated Sperax Treadmill. It includes a remote that I never use, and I actually keep its foldable handrails up; my height and desk are each tall enough that the rails fit, and I like the controls there.

I set up the new treadmill and started walking while working. It was like riding a bicycle. Just, you know, without wheels.

One foot in front of the other

When you’re first starting out on a treadmill desk, walking 1.5 miles per hour or slower is the way to go. It takes some time to get used to seeing your screen while you’re moving, and typing while walking adds some complexity. But if you start slow and work your way up, you can get to comfortable casual paces — again, mine is currently between 2.4 and 2.6 miles per hour — without impacting your work at all.

I still shut off the treadmill while on Zooms. But on audio calls, no one hears a thing. I’ve even recorded multiple podcast episodes while treading and no one knew. I use the NS1 Noise Supressor plugin from Waves on my recordings, but Zoom’s built-in noise cancellation and even GarageBand and Logic’s freely included noise gates do a great job of stripping out the treadmill’s sound.

I did encounter a few technical hurdles with my latest treadmill desk setup. Some were related to my displays, and some were related to getting my ego-boosting step count credit. Let’s start with the latter.

Log those steps, Jason style.

I wear an Apple Watch and an Oura Ring. Neither is particularly good at tracking steps on a treadmill desk. If you tell the Apple Watch you’re doing an indoor walk, it’ll fare slightly better, but only barely: In my testing over a few days, it would record 20 to 30 percent of the distance I actually covered.

The problem is that unlike normal walking — or even traditional treadmill walking — treadmill desk walking doesn’t involve my arm movement. I’m typing and walking literally right now as I write these words; there’s not much for smart devices to glom onto to figure out how many steps I’m taking. But I wanted credit for my steps, dammit!

You can buy (much) pricier treadmills that offer different levels of Apple Health integration through their own third-party apps. You can buy third-party adapters to strap your Apple Watch to your ankle, where it can log your steps better. (But unless you’re very limber, said placement makes it rather difficult to check your notifications.)

Even your iPhone itself can count your steps — and I considered just dropping mine in my pocket to measure my treadmill walking. But I, you know, use my phone a lot, so that solution didn’t seem like the right one.

I went even lower tech: I bought a cheap, rechargeable pedometer that I stick in my pocket when I’m on the treadmill. When I stop the treadmill, I look at the pedometer and manually log those steps in the Health app. Or I used to, until I asked myself WWJD: What would Jason do?

I built a dead-simple Shortcut with three steps: Ask for numerical input, log those steps in Health, and then confirm with an on-screen message. I saved that Shortcut as an app on my iPhone, and now it takes mere seconds to look at the pedometer, log those steps, and move on with my day.

Prioritize Shortcuts over your collection of Apple Watches.

Except… when I first started this approach, I noticed that Health (and my third-party apps that connected to it) didn’t always reflect my increased step count. I’d manually logged 10,000 incremental steps, but the app was stuck on 2500.

The trick is understanding how Health prioritizes disparate data sources. Apple knows you have multiple devices that theoretically can measure your physical activity (your phone, watch, third-party fitness apps), and does some behind-the-scenes work to avoid double counting. And by default, Health trusts the Apple Watch to be the best source of intel for your movement. I get that instinct, but it’s wrong for treadmill deskers.

To tweak this, head over to the Health app, tap the Browse tab, and find Steps. Scroll down to the bottom and choose “Data Sources & Access.” The next screen may take a long moment to load. Once it does, scroll to Data Sources. If your phone is anything like mine — and you’ve owned or reset a few Apple Watches and iPhones in your day — you will likely see a lengthy list. Mine lists multiple entries for “Lex’s Apple Watch” and “Alexander’s Apple Watch” and numerous old iPhones. And in my case, Shortcuts was listed at the very bottom.

Tap Edit at the top right, and drag Shortcuts way up to the top of the list. Now steps entered via your new Shortcut will take priority.

Monitoring your health

There was one final tech aspect I had to handle for my personal setup. I use an M2 MacBook Air, which supports one external display. But I still wanted my seated setup to work for when I need a walking break. And my giant, 3-foot wide curved Dell monitor wouldn’t fit in my standing desk space. So I ordered a new monitor for my treadmill desk setup, and needed to figure out how to connect both to my MacBook Air at the same time.

It was time for me to learn about DisplayLink. In truth, I learned as little as possible. I installed DisplayLink on my Mac and ordered a DisplayLink adapter, the subtly named WAvLINK USB 3.0 to HDMI Adapter for Multiple DIsplays, 2k. You may need a different one if your monitor has a higher resolution, but this worked great for me. I now have the treadmill monitor connected via that adapter and an HDMI cable, and — as with my giant Dell monitor — it mirrors my laptop’s screen.

Once that was all set up, I encountered one final hiccup: Notification Center stopped working.

I’d get texts and reminders and other alerts, and they’d be in Notification Center on my Mac itself, but they’d never appear as banners on screen.

That’s because mirrored Macs with multiple displays default to expecting you’re presenting something — so they hide your alerts. Head to System Settings -> Notification Center and turn on “Allow notifications when mirroring or sharing the display.”

Do tread on me

I’m down 19.1 pounds since November. I’ve walked more than two miles while writing this piece for Six Colors.

I take seated breaks when I need to, but honestly they’re fewer and further between than you might guess.

The last time I used a treadmill desk, I took to eating more desserts and such because I could do so without gaining weight, thanks to the extra calories I was burning walking 10 to 20 extra miles per day. This time, at least so far, I’m not eating so much extra; I’m just burning more.

Now that I’ve figured out all the nuances covered here, everything’s pretty seamless; I walk up to my desk, and then I start walking. As bad for you as lots of sitting can be, lots of walking is pretty darn healthy. And the journey of a thousand healthier work days begins with a single step.

[Lex Friedman is the co-host of The Rebound, an independent consultant, the proprietor of Lex.Games, and so much more--but he's not that other Lex.]


After 30 years, Script Debugger is being retired

Script Debugger in action
I was literally using Script Debugger yesterday to inspect variables.

Mark Alldritt & Shane Stanley of Late Night Software:

We are announcing the retirement of Script Debugger as a product.

January 2025 marks Script Debugger’s 30th anniversary. It’s been a very long run for a two-person effort. Script Debugger began as a Classic MacOS product, survived Apple’s near-death experience, transitioned to macOS X and migrated across 4 CPU processor types. We are so grateful for the support we’ve received over these years. This support allowed us to keep working on Script Debugger much longer than we ever imagined.

I’ve been a Script Debugger user for years. It has made building AppleScript scripts so much more by giving script developers access to debugging tools that the built-in Script Editor lacks. While I’m obviously disappointed in the end of the product, it’s been a remarkable 30-year run!

Also, if I’m being honest, I don’t use Script Debugger as much as I used to, because I don’t use AppleScript as much as I used to. It’s still unparalleled in the control it gives over Mac apps themselves, but I tend to use it as a bridging tool for places that Shortcuts and Keyboard Maestro can’t reach. For most general-purpose automation that doesn’t involve Mac apps, I’m using Python these days, not AppleScript. I graduated, I guess.

There are many great independent Mac apps out there that have been developed for decades by a single developer or a small team; I admit that I’ve been worried about the fate of those apps for a while now. Developers deserve to retire just like anyone else, but as happy as that moment can be for the people involved, I also selfishly dread the loss of another indie Mac app I’ve relied on for years.

The good news: Late Night Software will continue updating the app for six months and then will post past versions back to 5.0 on its website with serial numbers attached, so that people who rely on Script Debugger for older installations will be able to use it forever. Unfortunately, the next time a macOS update breaks something in Script Debugger, that’ll mark its end as an actively usable product.


LLMs aren’t always bad at writing news headlines

A collage of news headlines rewritten by ChatGPT

On Monday I complained about Apple’s response to Apple Intelligence making mistaken summaries of news headlines. But here’s the funny thing: large-language models are actually pretty good at writing news headlines.

The problem with Apple’s approach is that it’s summarizing a headline, which is itself a summary of an article written by a human being. As someone who has written and rewritten thousands of headlines, I can reveal that human headline writers are flawed, some headlines are just not very good, and that external forces can lead to very bad headlines becoming the standard.

Specifically, clickbait headlines are very bad, and an entire generation of headline writers has been trained to generate teaser headlines that purposefully withhold information in order to get that click. (Writing a push notification is not the same as writing a headline, but it’s at least similar.)

Not to get all Fred Jones on you, but: I was trained to write headlines that made you want to read more, but didn’t withhold information. The idea was to compete for your attention, not pose riddles that could only be decoded by reading the story in question.

The now-dead news app Artifact built a killer feature that rewrote clickbait headlines on demand. It used the complete content of the news story to write a new headline that was always better than the ones being served up by various news organizations. Yes, when given enough information and asked to generate a headline, it turns out that AI is pretty good at the job!

Still, as Mike Krieger of Artifact wrote about in a Medium post, the company also built in some layers of human validation:

When we rewrite a title given a user request, that new title is initially only visible to the user. If enough people request a rewrite of a given title, the rewritten title will be escalated for human review and if it looks good, we’ll promote it the new default title for all users.

One of the principles we use when applying AI to features inside Artifact is to be as transparent as possible. For both Summarize and the clickbait title rewriter, we’ve used consistent iconography (the star-like shape) to denote that there’s AI involvement.

It didn’t work out for Artifact, but there’s something here. Summarizing summaries isn’t working out for Apple, but more broadly I think there’s something to the idea of presenting AI-written headlines and summaries in order to provide utility to the user. As having an LLM running all the time on our devices becomes commonplace, I would love to see RSS readers (for example) that are capable of rewriting bad headlines and creating solid summaries. The key—as Artifact learned—is to build guardrails and always make it clear that the content is being generated by an LLM, not a human.


Apple Intelligence summaries might get warning labels. That’s not enough.

erroneous notification summaries

The BBC, following up on two reports of Apple Intelligence summaries that transformed its own headlines into factually inaccurate text, got a public response from Apple:

Apple has said it will update, rather than pause, a new artificial intelligence (AI) feature that has generated inaccurate news alerts on its latest iPhones.

The company, in its first acknowledgement of the concerns, on Monday said it was working on a software change to “further clarify” when the notifications are summaries that have been generated by the Apple Intelligence system.

Here’s what the BBC reports Apple’s statement is:

Apple Intelligence features are in beta and we are continuously making improvements with the help of user feedback. A software update in the coming weeks will further clarify when the text being displayed is summarization provided by Apple Intelligence. We encourage users to report a concern if they view an unexpected notification summary.

The statement uses the beta tag it has placed on Apple Intelligence features as a shield, while promising to add a warning label to AI-generated summaries in the future. It’s hard to accept “it’s in beta” as an excuse when the features have shipped in non-beta software releases that are heavily marketed to the public as selling points of Apple’s latest hardware. Adding a warning label also does not change the fact that Apple has released a feature that at its core consumes information and replaces it with misinformation at a troubling rate.

Apple is shipping these AI-based features rapidly, and marketing them heavily, because it fears that its competitors so far out in front that it’s a potentially existential issue. But several of these features simply aren’t up to Apple’s quality standards, and I worry that we’ve all become so inured to AI hallucinations and screw-ups that we’re willing to accept them.

We shouldn’t be. Apple’s shipping a feature that frequently rewrites headlines to be wrong. That’s a failure, and it shouldn’t be shrugged off as being the nature of OS features in the 2020s.

So what can Apple do now? A non-apology and the promise of a warning label isn’t enough. The company should either give all apps the option of opting out of AI summaries, or offer an opt-out to the developers of specific classes of apps (like news apps). Next, it should probably build separate pathways for notifications of related content (a bunch of emails or chat messages in a thread) versus unrelated content (BBC headlines, podcast episode descriptions) and change how the unrelated content is summarized. Perhaps a little further down the road, news notifications should be summarized based on the full text of the news article, rather than generating a secondhand machine summary of a story already summarized by a human headline writer.

Beta software contains an implicit promise that the developer will actively work to squash bugs and make the product better before it goes final. Adding a warning label in the interim is an easy band-aid, but it doesn’t address the underlying problem. Apple needs to do much more work here, and if it can’t, it needs to turn this feature off until it can release a version it can stand behind.


A new year dawns! We consider what it has in store for Apple and why the company’s A.I. features need to be judged critically. Then we turn back the clock to 2000 and consider the moment when Mac OS X changed everything.


25 years on, Mac OS X continues to be Apple’s standard bearer

2000 apple monitor with OS X

Twenty-five years ago, Steve Jobs took the stage at Macworld Expo in San Francisco and unveiled Mac OS X, ushering in a new era for the Mac and the world of desktop computing at large.

That sounds like hyperbole, but after watching the keynote for a second time—the first time was from the front row, thank you very much!—it’s remarkable what an enormous moment this was for Apple and the Mac.

It’s funny. What’s remarkable about the moment is actually how uneventful it seems. When I watch the video back, it’s almost surreal how Steve Jobs keeps doing utterly normal, boring things in Mac OS X while the crowd completely loses its collective mind. Viewed by someone without any historical context, it would seem like a cult being whipped into a frenzy by its leader.

But I was there, and I can tell you that it wasn’t that. This was the moment, after sixteen years of classic Mac OS—and let’s face it, the last five of those were pretty rough—when all the failings of the Mac were swept away and replaced with something modern, ready for the challenge of the 21st Century.

How did that work out for Apple? The keynote seems so weird now because almost everything in it is just how the Mac works, even 25 years later. Yes, interface styles have changed over time, but that moment on stage in January 2000 redefined the Mac for 25 years and counting.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


25 years since the Dock’s debut

The Dock!

Sunday marks the 25th anniversary of the unveiling of Mac OS X, and yeah, I wrote the cover story for Macworld. While I was working on a forthcoming piece celebrating that anniversary, I asked my friend James Thomson if he had a good link about his time working on the Dock, which was unveiled as a part of that event.

He said he didn’t, but was apparently inspired enough to write one for me to link to:

The version [Steve] showed was quite different to what actually ended up shipping, with square boxes around the icons, and an actual “Dock” folder in your user’s home folder that contained aliases to the items stored.

I should know – I had spent the previous 18 months or so as the main engineer working away on it. At that very moment, I was watching from a cubicle in Apple Cork, in Ireland. For the second time in my short Apple career, I said a quiet prayer to the gods of demos, hoping that things didn’t break. For context, I was in my twenties at this point and scared witless.

The timeline is interesting. James wrote his classic Mac utility DragThing before working at Apple, then was hired by Apple, then ended up working on the Dock, and then left Apple… to resume working on DragThing.

Also: James’s story about Apple trying to hide James’s location from Steve Jobs is an all-time classic.


This Week in Apple: I’m goin’ to Wendy’s!

John Moltz and his conspiracy board. Art by Shafer Brown.

The Vision Pro goes limited edition, Mark Gurman gets misquoted, and lunch is on Siri.

Vision Proh no!

Is it curtains for the Vision Pro?! No. But can we at least get some curtains to cover up those eyeballs?

“Apple Vision Pro May Now Be Out of Production”

This shouldn’t be that surprising as we already knew that Apple has made pretty much every Vision Pro it expects to sell before the next version comes out.

But it remains to be seen if Apple is can make the device more appealing than the expensive, heavy, and slightly weird first version. So far the big hardware difference expected is a faster processor so the Vision Pro can run Apple Intelligence — something not many are clamoring for — and play games that don’t exist yet.

Hardware seems to be less of an issue, though, than software and price. Still, some gems continue to roll out from time to time.

“Apple Vision Pro just got a planetarium, and it’s friggin’ awesome”

The mad geniuses at Sandwich continue to be committed to the Vision Pro and have already updated their Theater app for the device, adding Plex streaming as well as a planetarium to pre-existing features like YouTube streaming.

Meanwhile, Wicked director Jon M. Chu said he used a Vision Pro to help edit the film. You know, like you do?

He would then zoom in and “draw” on the screen using his finger to point out potential edits. “Like, ‘hey, this ear looks weird on the goat’ …”

Slow sales figures sparking production cuts are one indicator, but if you know of a better way to point out edits that need to be made to virtual goat ears, then I’d like to hear it.

I thought not.

Misrumored

A minor brouhaha (a kerfuffle, if you will) erupted this week, as it was widely reported that Mark Gurman was suggesting Apple would, in addition to moving the charging port, put voice control in the upcoming revision to the Magic Mouse.

Gurman then sighed, saying: “You know nothing of my work.”

“Gurman: Voice Control for Next Magic Mouse ‘Makes Sense’”

…the rumor making the rounds today is just an incorrect back-and-forth translation of this line from my initial report…

Gurman was apparently just rattling off technologies, not suggesting they’d be squeezed into the diminutive device. And, thus, like Doctor Manhattan, did he leave the Earth for Mars, where he sat quietly to contemplate, far beyond the din of the masses.

OK, so if we can’t fulfill our lifelong dream of talking to mice, what else is on the horizon?

“iPhone 17 Air’s Thickness and Price Range Revealed in New Report”

New details indicate that while phones continue to get larger, they are at least getting thinner. The iPhone 17 Air is now reported to be about 20 percent thinner than the iPhone 16 and 25 percent thinner than the Phone 16 Pro.

For further comparison, that’s 344 percent thinner than the current MacBook Air and an astonishing 900 percent thinner than a PowerBook 5300. Just, you know, to put it in perspective.

Siri, how could you?

Apple’s about to make it rain dollar dollar bills on us, y’all.

“Apple will pay $95 million to settle Siri privacy lawsuit, and you might get a cut”

$95 million! That’s as much revenue as Apple makes in a quarter!

Oh, sorry, I misread Apple’s quarterly results. It makes $95 billion a quarter. So, it’s as much as the company makes in two hours. Yeah, they’re not even going to feel that. Dang.

Well, still. At least we aggrieved Apple customers are getting something.

Apple’s settlement will pay users up to $20 per Siri device impacted

Awww, yeah! Look out, Wendy’s! Ya boi coming for a 20-piece Saucy Nuggs Combo! And he’s gettin’ $2.21 back!

Unless there’s tax.

They may be able to take our privacy, but they’ll never take our Saucy Nuggs.

[John Moltz is a Six Colors contributor. You can find him on Mastodon at Mastodon.social/@moltz and he sells items with references you might get on Cotton Bureau.]


More Apple Intelligence, and whither Vision Pro

The year of Apple Intelligence comes around (again), and Apple needs to decide where the Vision Pro goes next. [Post-show: The long way to Passkeys and magic links.]



Golden Apple Awards celebrate apps for blind and visually impaired users

AppleVis has announced its 13th Golden Apple Awards, recognizing apps and games designed for (or useful to) people who are blind or visually impaired. The awards also honored a developer and included a new award for ongoing achievement.

  • The past year’s best app, as voted by AppleVis community members, is Seeing AI from Microsoft. Developed by a blind engineer within Microsoft, Seeing AI was first released in 2017, and has evolved to include a growing list of modules that use machine learning and AI features to read text, identify objects and products, and describe photos and people.
  • Best Game for 2024 went to Downcaster: Deckbuilding RPG, by Rick van der Wall.

  • Jienfeng Wu took Developer of the Year honors for his resurrection of Soundscape, an app initially developed by Microsoft, and later dropped. Now called VoiceVista, the app allows blind users to understand their surroundings by using sound at various pitches and frequencies.

  • A new award, named for the founder of AppleVis, recognizes a developer who has made ongoing contributions to accessibility. The David Goodwin Award recognizes a developer who has made an outstanding and lasting impact for people who are blind, deaf/blind, or who have low vision over a minimum of the last three years. The inaugural award went to Envision Technologies, whose EnvisionAI uses AI to process visual information and provide it to blind users through an app or via the company’s smart glasses. Honorable mentions for the Goodwin Award went to Weather Gods Ltd (Weather Gods), and Aira Tech Corp (Aira Explorer)

Nominees for the Golden Apples were made by a committee of writers and podcasters (disclosure: yours truly included), and accessibility experts. The nominees were then voted on by AppleVis community members.


Quick Tip: Which USB devices are currently attached?

A shortcut showing the command below being used in the Shortcuts app.

I’ve recently switched from using two computers in two different offices (the hard-to-heat garage and my well-heated back bedroom) to using one computer (a MacBook Pro) docked in either location. There’s a lot that has gone into this decision, which I will detail in a future post, but this post is about one of the most frustrating aspects of this switch: the inability of my computer and automations and settings to understand when the context has changed.

Fortunately, my Mac reacts to switches to my network configuration with aplomb, so I don’t have to dive deeep into Network Locations, though if I did, there are several alternatives to old classic utilities like ControlPlane.

But I record a lot of podcasts, and I have two entirely different USB devices that I use for audio. How can I make it so that when I press the “record” button, the right USB device is recording and receiving audio?

My overall solution ended up being pretty complex, but the key insight was to use a Terminal command to list all the connected USB devices. You don’t need to know a lick of Terminal to use it, because you can stick it in a “Run Shell Script” block in Shortcuts. Here’s the command:

ioreg -p IOUSB -w0 | sed 's/[^o]*o //; s/@.*$//' | grep -v '^Root.*'

This command will output a list of all your currently attached USB devices in plain text.

(Optional explanation: ioreg will display an enormous list of devices and ports on your system. -p IOUSB restricts it to USB devices and -w0 makes it display complete devices one per line, without truncation. That result is sent to sed, which uses a regular expression to match just the names of the attached USB devices. The final step is to use grep to remove the initial line, which summarizes the list rather than listing an actual USB device. You don’t need to know this.)

At that point, you can build a Shortcut that alters its behavior based on the contents of the output. For example, my Shortcut’s next step is an If/then block that checks to see if the result contains the text “MV7” for my Shure MV7 microphone or “USBPre” for my USBPre2 audio interface. But it’ll work with any USB device that happens to be attached at a given time.


The state of passkeys

Ars Technica’s senior security editor Dan Goodin breaks down where we are with passkeys going into 2025:

The security benefits of passkeys at the moment are also undermined by an undeniable truth. Of the hundreds of sites supporting passkeys, there isn’t one I know of that allows users to ditch their password completely. The password is still mandatory. And with the exception of Google’s Advanced Protection Program, I know of no sites that won’t allow logins to fall back on passwords, often without any additional factor. Even then, all but Google APP accounts can be accessed using a recovery code.

This fallback on phishable, stealable credentials undoes some of the key selling points of passkeys. As soon as passkey adoption poses a meaningful hurdle in account takeovers, threat actors will devise hacks and social engineering attacks that exploit this shortcoming. Then we’re right back where we were before.

This is a great and thorough look at this technology, disheartening as the truth of it is. The fundamental problem is that while the idea of passkeys is excellent, the implementation of it has been a mess. Every platform and site seems to have its own different way of handling the process, and what should be simple has instead become extremely confusing.

The passkey portability standard should help part of the problem, but overall there needs to be some standardization on how the passkey logins are implemented so that users aren’t befuddled.

And I’m not even restricting that to non-tech-savvy users. I’ve run into multiples sites where I have set up a passkey and it doesn’t work correctly. Just last night I was trying to log into iTunes Connect on my iPhone: iOS showed I had a passkey and offered to use it, but for some reason, the site kept throwing an error. Maddening.

That said, there are plenty of places where passwords vary in their implementation. (Please stop putting username and password fields on different pages, thank you.) We’re in the midst of a painful transition period, and while I’m glad to see so many sites and services embrace passkeys, the fine details are going to take longer to iron out than I’d hoped.



2025 will be the year of Apple Intelligence–again

As a sports fan, I’m besieged with ads for gambling these days. Sports media is full of experts that are happy to claim they know who’s going to win and who’s going to lose, but of course, if they really had all the answers they’d be rich and not flogging their predictions.

What I’m saying is, nobody knows anything. And while I’ve been covering Apple since time immemorial (okay, the 1990s) and predicting in this space for a decade, let’s just say that nobody’s perfect.

Still, it’s fun to think about the blank canvas that 2025 offers us. Here are my predictions for what’s to come in the next year. As always, no wagering.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


The Back Page: Getting the carbon out

Dan writes the Back Page. Art by Shafer Brown.

Hi team, it’s Tim.

As we boldly venture forward into a brand new year, it’s a good time to update you on our pledge to make Apple carbon neutral by 2030. I have to admit, this seemed like a lock at the time, given that we had deprecated Carbon back in 2012, but I appear to have deeply misunderstood what I was promising. Thanks, Craig, for the clarification.

Regardless, we’ve made great strides in the last year, introducing a carbon-neutral version of the Apple Watch Series 10; releasing our first carbon-neutral Mac, the new Mac mini; and eliminating spaghetti carbonara at Caffe Macs. We’re not sure if it had carbon in it, but better safe than sorry.

We’ve also cut our overall greenhouse gas emissions by 55 percent since 2015, which may not seem that long ago, but that is the year in which Marty McFly traveled to the future and it’s now the past, which is really doing my head in. Remind me to talk to Phil about the status of our flying car project.

None of this is to pat ourselves on the back: there’s still a lot of work left to be done. While we’ve accomplished a lot over the last decade and a half, eking out those last few bits of carbon is where the pedal really meets the (hopefully carbon-free) metal.

Unfortunately, the most significant remaining source of carbon in our business is the one that may prove most difficult to mitigate: our people. Despite our best efforts, 100 percent of Apple employees remain carbon-based lifeforms.

We’ve had a number of high-level meetings on this topic, and have discussed many bold ideas, from outfitting all employees with solar-panel-equipped headwear to encouraging them to utilize treadmills during the workday to power their devices. I have had to inform Johnny Srouji multiple times that we cannot simply replace them with Apple Silicon-based employees. He’s…uncomfortably enthusiastic about the prospect.

So this does present a challenge for us, one that we must all rise to confront, although more the rest of Apple’s workforce than me personally. Reducing carbon is a necessity, something that we must undertake in order to save the environment that we have ruined, and the only way to do that is to remove ourselves from the equation, as dispassionately as possible. I have personally promised that starting in 2025 I will replace my personal jet trips with Spatial FaceTime calls via Apple Vision Pro. Or, failing that, conversations conducted entirely via Genmoji. And Apple Park already isn’t stocking my preferred Diet Mountain Dew—we tried to decarbonate it, but frankly, it was disgusting. Not, as it turns out, unlike regular Diet Mountain Dew.

But this isn’t something I can do alone. 2025 will mark the year that we finally begin this latest transition. Fortunately, we’ve been through plenty before: from 68k to PowerPC to Intel to Apple Silicon, from Mac OS to Mac OS X to macOS to iPhone Software to iOS to iPadOS…you get the picture.

Ultimately, it comes down to a choice: we can either choose to foster our lifelong commitment to Apple intelligence or our 2024 commitment to Apple Intelligence. I know which one I’d choose, and I think you do too. Yes, it’s definitely the one you’re thinking of. We all agree.

So, a happy new year to you all, and thanks for all the hard work that you’ve done for both Apple and this world that we all share, even if I get to see much more of it than you do—have I mentioned my private jet? I look forward to a revolutionary 2025 with those of you that embrace our new radical decarbonization process. Well, those that survive anyway.

Best,
Tim

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


It’s time for the 11th Annual Upgradies! Myke and Jason discuss their favorites of 2024, take the input of many Upgradians, and hand out awards in numerous categories! Only the finest will walk away with the most coveted of titles: Upgradies Winner.


Our 2024 favorites: TV, books, movies, and podcasts

Vince Vaughn in “Bad Monkey” (Apple TV+)

TV

Bad Monkey

A surprise hit, this Vince Vaughn vehicle on Apple TV+ is based on a Carl Hiaasen novel of the same name, following Florida cop Andrew Yancey—suspended from duty for…reasons—as he gets embroiled in a fishy case after a fisherman finds a severed arm. This is one of my favorite sub-genres of crime stories: darkly funny, wildly eccentric, and full of colorful characters. There is a monkey, but it’s not about the monkey…or is it?

Standout performances go to Jodie Turner-Smith (also electric this year in the much more uneven Star Wars show The Acolyte) as the Dragon Queen and Meredith Hagner as the “bereaved” widow Eve. There’s also a great sub-plot involving Saturday Night Live veteran Alex Moffat as a floundering real-estate agent.

While this season tells a perfectly concluded story, I’m glad to hear that the show will be returning for season two…my only question is whether or not the monkey will return too.—Dan Moren

Star Trek: Lower Decks Season 5

I do feel bad for Star Trek: Prodigy which had its second, and potentially final season this year, and Star Trek: Discovery which also came to a kind of sputtering finish, but Lower Decks is the one I love the most. Yep, a 2D animated cartoon by one of the Rick and Morty guys. Little did I know how much I would miss it. If you didn’t get the chance to check it out there’s five great seasons, with only a handful of episodes that could have been better. That’s an outstanding run for a Star Trek show, or any show for that matter. The fact that it’s an animated show means they can also do things that the live action Treks can’t. Something they’ve taken full advantage of over the years, and especially this season.—Joe Rosensteel

Silo

The first season of Apple TV+’s adaptation of Hugh Howey’s viral self-published “Wool” series was unexpectedly great. Season two is a change of pace, quite literally, as the outcome of the first season leads to a split storyline for season two. While some might resist the natural slowdown in pacing—parceling out two stories necessarily means slowing things down—the intrigue continued, new characters came to the fore, and the mystery of the Silo deepened. Rebecca Ferguson, Tim Robbins, Common, and Steve Zahn (!) all gave great performances this season.—Jason Snell

Superman & Lois

The fourth and final season of the CW’s take on the man of steel also marks the end of the Arrowverse, the twelve years of DC comics shows on the network. (Even though Superman & Lois itself is technically only Arrowverse-adjacent—don’t at me.) It seems appropriate that a venture that started depicting a B-level, powerless vigilante should culminate with the most iconic and powerful of superheroes.

The last season is heavy on the pathos and family drama, while also doing its own spin on one of the most infamous Superman storylines. But one of the show’s strengths is its humanistic portrayal of Clark, a refreshing antidote to the distant and seemingly unfeeling god of the recent DC movies. There’s also an excellent menacing performance by Michael Cudlitz as a decidedly different kind of Lex Luthor, and the show is, as always, anchored by fantastic performances from Tyler Hoechlin and Bitsie Tulloch as the titular couple. If you don’t find yourself getting weepy in the show’s closing minutes, then you may be carved of stone.—DM

Shōgun

The show of the year might be FX and Disney+’s Shōgun, a sprawling epic of feudal Japan. That it was this good is something of a miracle, given that it’s an American adaptation of a James Clavell novel previously adapted into a popular (but questionable) 80s ministeries starring Richard Chamberlain. But by leaning heavily into Japanese creators and collaborators, the show really blossomed. Hiroyuki Sanada’s character of Toranaga becomes the true central character, with the Anjin (Cosmo Jarvis in the Chamberlain part) and Mariko (the unforgettable Anna Sawai) not having to carry the weight that the characters did in the original adaptation. I read the book, watched the original miniseries, and wondered why they bothered trying to make this. But the creative team, led by Rachael Kondo and Justin Marks (the creator of all-time classic Counterpart) nailed it. What a wonderful ride.—JS

Monsieur Spade

A one-off miniseries following Dashiell Hammett’s iconic sleuth, Sam Spade, who has retired to France in the 1960s. Having taken up the pastoral life, he’s dragged back into his old profession after a brutal murder at a convent leaves him watching over one of the only witnesses, a teenage girl with whom he has a past. The story unfolds in traditional convoluted film noir fashion, interspersed with Spade’s own personal demons and—surprisingly enough—French politics of the era.

If all of that isn’t enough to get you in the door, the show’s anchored by a great performance from Clive Owen as the retired sleuth and the behind the scenes creators include Scott Frank (Oscar nominated for his screenplays for Out of Sight and Logan) and Tom Fontana (Homicide: Life on the Street, Oz). It’s an absolutely fabulous looking show too; shot with a cinematic look and feel to it. And with just six episodes, it’s tightly constructed—taut with not too many frills, appropriate for Spade himself.—DM

The Traitors U.S.

The Traitors is a reality competition show that’s shot in a Scottish castle, with a host who comes dressed in kilts, tartans and tweeds. How is that reality? Well, what we call reality TV is anything but, and I mostly give the genre a pass. But this show, whose second US season aired this year, is fun, suspenseful and delightfully campy. The Traitors divides contestants into “faithfuls” and “traitors.” No one knows who is who, and it’s the faithfuls job to find and evict the traitors, one by one, all while the traitors gather as a group to “murder” one faithful each night. It’s hosted by the spectacular Alan Cumming, playing his part as lord of the manor to the hilt. This year’s installment brought together reality contestants from Big Brother, Survivor, the Bachelor, the Real Housewives franchises, and more, to murder and be murdered, scheme and play silly games. The first season featured a mix of normies and reality stars, but leaving out the civilians this year turned the drama and charisma on display up several notches. I know it’s true because I was only familiar with two of the contestants, as they’re past players on the only other reality show I watch, Big Brother (which also had a great 2024 season). I had no idea I would be rooting for a Real Housewife to win the game. The Traitors is an international phenomenon, with franchises in the UK, Canada, New Zealand and Australia, all reputed to be great fun. The new US season, with more reality stars already announced, debuts next month on Peacock.—Shelly Brisbin

Movies

Man’s Castle

The May release of Man’s Castle (1933) on Blu-ray says everything about why I collect physical media. I’m a classic film obsessive, and streamers can’t be trusted to show some movies I want to see. And when a rare gem like Frank Borzage’s Man’s Castle gets restored because an intrepid film historian found nine previously deleted minutes of the film, physical media is where I’ll be able to see those new scenes. It’s a 4K restoration from the original 35 mm nitrate negative, and it looks and sounds great. Man’s Castle is a precode film, so when it was rereleased in the post-code late 1930s, these minutes were very sloppily edited out, because of racy dialog and even some suggestive images of the leads skinny-dipping. The film is a Depression-era saga of a couple, living hand-to mouth, under a bridge. He is the youngest Spencer Tracy you’ve probably ever seen, and she is the winsome Loretta Young, who you will root for throughout. Beautifully and sensitively directed by Borzage, it’s a true discovery that you can’t see on your favorite streaming service.—SB

Books

Karla’s Choice

It’s one thing to fill the shoes of a literary giant—it’s another when it’s also your dad. Noted sci-fi author Nick Harkaway switches genres to pick up the mantle of his father, legendary spy scribe John Le Carré, who passed away in 2020. The result is Karla’s Choice, which brings back Le Carré’s most indelible protagonist, spymaster George Smiley (most memorably portrayed on TV and in film respectively by dual icons Alec Guinness and Gary Oldman).

Set in the previously unexamined period between Le Carré’s breakout hit The Spy Who Came in From the Cold and his equally acclaimed Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, the book finds Smiley, haunted by the fallout of the former story, having left the employ of British intelligence agency the Circus and attempting to patch up his tempestuous marriage. When a would-be assassin shows up to kill a seemingly random literary agent, Smiley is pulled back into the shadows. The result is a labyrinthine tale of loss and secrets, conjured in an impeccable Le Carré style—with just enough of Harkaway’s own tone injected to play to his strengths. —DM

Service Model

I’m picking Adrian Tchaikovsky’s Service Model. It can be picked up as an ebook, which makes it technology, but I really wanted to highlight it for the subject matter, which is also technology. More importantly, the use (or misuse) of technology in a former, stratified society. The book is from the perspective of a robot valet that needs to go on a quest through the decaying, dystopian remains of human civilization. You wouldn’t believe it from that bleak description, but it’s also very funny.—JR

[This was also my favorite book of the year. —JS]

Penric & Desdemona series

This year I ripped through the 12 novellas and one novel of Lois McMaster Bujold’s Penric and Desdemona series. These are high fantasy stories, which aren’t usually my favorite, but Bujold is such a great writer—her Vorkosigan Saga series is must-read sci-fi—that I had been meaning to jump into this series, and I’m so glad I did.

The simple version: Penric is a young man who, largely by accident, ends up being inhabited by a demon, which he eventually names Desdemona. Demons aren’t fundamentally evil in this world, and Penric and Desdemona end up as both sides of an buddy action/comedy duo in a single body as they navigate a world of violence, magic, and tragedy. Just as Bujold sketched the lives of her Vorkosigan series characters from youth through old age, she also lets us watch Penric grow from callow youth to well-seasoned veteran. And since most of these stories are novellas, they’re bite sized, so you can read as many as you want. Me, I couldn’t stop. I read them all.—JS

Grave Expectations

I like a good mystery with some supernatural elements, and Alice Bell’s debut novel Grave Expectations manages to hit both of those genres with a solid dose of hilarity. Claire is ekeing out a paltry living as a medium, “haunted” by the ghost of her friend, Sophie, who disappeared when the two were in high school. She’s hired to do a seance at an English country house for a particularly eccentric family, and is surprised to discover the grounds are haunted by the ghost of someone murdered there the previous year.

Naturally, they investigate. If you were to wonder if hijinks would ensue, yes, yes they do. I honestly found this one of the funniest books I’ve read in years—it’s pretty rare that I laugh out loud while reading, but I did during this book. Several times. It’s the perfect cross of ghost story and murder mystery, not too dark despite its subject matter, and Claire is an appealing if flawed protagonist.—DM

Podcasts

A Very Good Year

How do you talk about movies from every era of cinema? If you’re the hosts of A Very Good Year, you organize each podcast episode around a guest and a specific year of moviemaking, from the ancient classic era, to modern times. Jason Bailey and Mike Hull are enthusiastic movie fans, but they rely on guests, who range from filmmakers and actors to critics and film bloggers, to choose five films from the year they’ve picked, and explain why they’re great, or just favorites. The top fives are surrounded by a short news segment for the chosen year, and a lightning round where the group chews over award-winners and other significant films of the year. The format is lively and engaging, and the hosts have lots of opinions, both good and bad, about the movies they cover. And they can be kind of foul-mouthed, too, if you care about that. The guys at A Very Good Year retired the show this year, promising a new show in 2025.—SB

The Rest Is History

Late last year I discovered Goalhanger’s The Rest is History podcast and the rest—well, you know. It became my most listened-to podcast of 2024. Hosted by two British historians, it’s podcasting exactly the way I like it: two personalities who feed off one another as they tell gripping stories from the past. Both Tom Holland and Dominic Sandbrook have good senses of humor (“That definitely happened, didn’t it?”) and pick a refreshingly broad range of topics, including wonderful series about Montezuma and the Aztecs, the roots of the French Revolution, Custer and the battle of Little Big Horn, and the conquest of Britain by the Romans. I can’t recommend it highly enough.—JS


This Week in Apple: Inching up

John Moltz and his conspiracy board. Art by Shafer Brown.

Apple teases an Apple TV event of some kind, but new hardware won’t be coming until later in the year. And for a company that loves accessibility, it sure seems determined to make iPhone screens too big for a lot of people to use comfortably.

Remember, remember, the fourth and fifth of Janvember

Apple has taken to social media to tease an upcoming TV+ event on January 4th and 5th.

Apple’s images have a tagline that says “See for yourself,” but it isn’t clear what Apple has planned.

Could it be another “day we’ll never forget”? Eh, probably not. And we already kind of forgot that one, to be honest. Speculation revolves around either a free trial period for TV+ or a preview of upcoming shows. Personally, I hope it’s an open draft. Put your name in and you can be cast in Severance, Slow Horses, Silo or one of the other hit shows on Apple TV+ that starts with an ‘S’.

I’d love to be a sec unit in an upcoming season of “Murderbot”.

But, yeah, it’s probably just a preview.

Apple TV minus

Speaking of Apple’s TV offerings, the current batch of rumors indicated that we can expect to see a brand new Apple TV device some time in 2025.

Did they add another K when I wasn’t looking? I can’t even use all the Ks I have now. Not with my eyesight.

It’s actually not entirely clear what a new Apple TV would provide. Mark Gurman has speculated it would have a faster Wi-Fi and Bluetooth chip and possibly a built-in camera. That doesn’t seem like it’ll drive a lot of upgrades.

But what if it also had a faster chip? That, presumably, would be capable of running Apple Intelligence? Picture this: Image Playground on the big screen!

Nah, I’m good.

OK, fine, how about a cheaper Apple TV? Ming-chi Kuo says he believes Apple will once again ship a sub-$100 Apple TV unit. As long as it doesn’t run Apple Intelligence, I’ll take ten.

If you see a Pop Socket, they blew it

Apple may have canceled its truly small smartphone, but it still somehow makes the best small smartphone, according to some.

“iPhone 16 is surprisingly the best small phone of 2024 according to MKBHD”

Just imagine how much better of a best small smartphone of 2024 it would have been if it had been even smaller. Say… mini, for example.

I know. It’s a ridiculous idea. Whoever heard of a small smartphone?

What’s hilarious to me is that I distinctly recall a bunch of people trying to argue that Apple used a large-handed hand model to advertise the original iPhone in order to make it look smaller, because people were arguing it was too big. Now everyone wants phones the size of dinner plates.

Well, at least Apple is surely taking this success as a sign that it got it juuust right and can slow down on relentlessly making the next iteration of every iPhone ever bigger and bigger.

Now, to take a biiig sip of coffee before I read the iPhone 17 rumors.

The iPhone 17 could measure in at 6.3 inches, up from 6.1 inches…

PFFFFFFFFT.

iPhone sizes will continue to increase and morale can get bent, apparently.

With the iPhone 17 Air expected to be in the 6.5 to 6.6-inch range, that jabs the thumb even further into the eye of those of us who prefer smaller phones. Come 2026, the smallest phone Apple will be selling is likely to be the 6.1-inch iPhone SE 4.

Looks like I picked a bad year to get back on the Upgrade Program.

And to stop sniffing glue.

Ha, like I could stop sniffing glue.

It’s only Elmer’s, though. I just love the smell of it.

[John Moltz is a Six Colors contributor. You can find him on Mastodon at Mastodon.social/@moltz and he sells items with references you might get on Cotton Bureau.]



Search Six Colors